AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 233: G434-G438, 1977;
0193-1857/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potter, D.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Potter, D.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, G
AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 233, Issue 5, G434-G438
Copyright © 1977 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Kinetic differences between uterine and renal renins in the dog

DM Potter, WJ McDonald, J Metcalfe, and G Porter

It has previously been reported that in the dog the Michaelis constant (Km) of renal renin with respect to homologous plasma substrate is the same as that for the angiotensin-generating enzyme extractable from the myometrium during pregnancy. We have reexamined the kinetics with a different methodology. Enzyme preparations from dog kidneys, the uterus of a nonnephrectomized pregnant bitch, and the uterus of a nephrectomized pregnant bitch were used. The substrate, prepared by diluting plasma from a nephrectomized, hysterectomized pregnant bitch, had a maximum endogenous substrate concentration of 1,750 ng/ml angiotensin I equivalents. Lineweaver-Burk kinetic analysis was used to calculate the Michaelis constants at pH 6.2. The Km of the renal enzyme was 720 ng/ml, of the enzyme prepared from the nonnephrectomized uterus 1,570 ng/ml, and of the nephrectomized dog uterus 1,500 ng/ml. The uterine enzyme was not activated by transient acid treatment, in contrast to renins reported from other sources. The data support the concept of biochemical heterogeneity of the two enzymes in the dog.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online