AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 238: G190-G196, 1980;
0193-1857/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binder, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binder, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, J. D.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 238, Issue 3 190-G196, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide and secretin on small intestinal epithelial cells

H. J. Binder, G. F. Lemp and J. D. Gardner

Binding of 125I-labeled vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) to dispersed enterocytes prepared from guinea pig small intestine was saturable, temperature dependent, and reversible, and reflected interaction of the labeled peptide with a single class of binding sites. Each enterocyte possessed approximately 60,000 binding sites and binding of the tracer to these sites could be inhibited by VIP [concentration for half-maximal effect (Kd), 12 nM] and by secretin (Kd greater than 1 micro M), but not by glucagon, gastrin, cholecystokinin, calcitonin, bombesin, litorin, physalaemin, substance P, eledoisin, serotonin, carbamylcholine, or histamine. With VIP and secretin, there was a close correlation between the relative potency for inhibition of binding of 125I-VIP and that for increasing cellular cAMP. For a given peptide, however, a 10-fold higher concentration was required for half-maximal inhibition of binding than for half-maximal stimulation of cellular cAMP. In addition to inhibiting binding of 125I-VIP and increasing cellular cAMP in enterocytes, secretin caused an increase in short-circuit current across guinea pig small intestine in vitro. Prostaglandin E1 increased cellular cAMP, but did not alter binding of 125I-VIP and the increase in cAMP caused by prostaglandin E1 plus VIP or secretin was equal to the sum of the increase caused by each agent alone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
M Newton, M A Kamm, P O Soediono, P Milner, W R Burnham, and G Burnstock
Oesophageal epithelial innervation in health and reflux oesophagitis
Gut, March 1, 1999; 44(3): 317 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online