|
|
||||||||
AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 239, Issue 3 167-G172, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society
ARTICLES |
M. G. Sarr, K. A. Kelly and S. F. Phillips
To determine whether absorption varies during interdigestive and digestive motor states, an isolated, 75-cm segment of jejunum was perfused in each of five dogs with an isosmolar solution of 130 mM glucose, 80 mM NaCl, and [3H]polyethylene glycol (PEG). Effluent was collected from the distal stoma during 10-min intervals. Electrical activity of the segment was recorded concurrently. Transit times were assessed with boluses of [14C]-PEG. The dogs were studied during phase I, phase II, and phase III of the interdigestive myoelectric complex and also after a 200-g meal of liver. Absorption during fasting was greatest during phase I and least during phase III of the interdigestive myoelectric complex; feeding enhanced absorption over that seen during any phase of fasting. Transit was slowest in phase I of fasting and most rapid during phase III; transits during phase II of fasting and after feeding were roughly equal. Using indicator-dilution calculations, static volumes were greatest and mean flows slowest during phase I. Thus, jejunal absorption during fasting decreased as transit increased sequentially with the interdigestive myoelectric phases. However, after feeding, although transit time was similar to phase II, absorption was greater.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Chaikomin, K. L. Wu, S. Doran, K. L. Jones, A. J. P. M. Smout, W. Renooij, R. H. Holloway, J. H. Meyer, M. Horowitz, and C. K. Rayner Concurrent duodenal manometric and impedance recording to evaluate the effects of hyoscine on motility and flow events, glucose absorption, and incretin release Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): G1099 - G1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Bryant, R. J. Fraser, R. Vozzo, B. Zacharakis, G. M. Matthews, and R. Butler Stimulation of small intestinal burst activity in the postprandial state differentially affects lipid and glucose absorption in healthy adult humans Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): G1028 - G1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Imam, C. Sanmiguel, B. Larive, Y. Bhat, and E. Soffer Study of intestinal flow by combined videofluoroscopy, manometry, and multiple intraluminal impedance Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): G263 - G270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Schwartz, M. Samsom, W. Renooij, L. W. van Steenderen, M. A. Benninga, E.-J. M. van Geenen, M. A. van Herwaarden, M. B.M. de Smet, and A. J.P.M. Smout Small Bowel Motility Affects Glucose Absorption in a Healthy Man Diabetes Care, October 1, 2002; 25(10): 1857 - 1861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T E BOWLING and D B A SILK Colonic responses to enteral tube feeding Gut, February 1, 1998; 42(2): 147 - 151. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |