AJP - GI Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 239: G378-G381, 1980;
0193-1857/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bynum, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fara, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bynum, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fara, J. W.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 239, Issue 5 378-G381, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Hepatic artery response to vasopressin

T. E. Bynum and J. W. Fara

As vasopressin began to be used widely to control gastrointestinal hemorrhage, there was concern over the effect of vasopressin on the hepatic circulation. Although an initial vasoconstrictor effect of the drug has been described on the hepatic artery, a secondary increase in blood flow ensues. This increase has been attributed to the accompanying decrease in portal blood flow produced by vasopressin. The present study was done to investigate the mechanism of the response of hepatic artery to vasopressin in dogs. Anesthetized dogs were studied with flow probes placed on hepatic, superior mesenteric, femoral, and renal arteries, and the animals were prepared so that portal blood was diverted into jugular vein, with portal inflow to liver delivered at varying rates with blood pumped from a femoral artery. Vasopressin (0.5-1.0 U/kg) was administered intravenously. Results in dog indicate the biphasic response of hepatic artery blood flow to vasopressin is not dependent on changes in portal blood flow. Rather, it appears to be a characteristic response of this vessel. The biphasic response was not observed in other vascular beds studied and was not modified by atropine. beta-Adrenergic blockade enhanced the vasoconstrictor portion of the response, but this did not significantly alter the secondary blood flow increase.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online