AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 241: G93-G97, 1981;
0193-1857/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hersey, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hersey, S. J.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 241, Issue 2 93-G97, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Histamine receptor in bullfrog gastric mucosa

S. J. Hersey

The histamine receptor of isolated bullfrog gastric mucosa was characterized in terms of respiration and acid secretory responses to histamine antagonists and agonists. Cimetidine, a selective H2-antagonist, showed competitive antagonism of histamine responses with a pA2 value of 6.55. In contrast, the H1-antagonist, mepyramine, showed inhibition only at very high concentrations. Based on these results, the histamine receptor would be classified as the H2 type. Measurements of agonist potency sequence revealed a marked difference between the amphibian and mammalian gastric histamine receptors. The selective H1-agonists, 2-pyridylethylamine and 2-aminoethylthiozol, were found to be more efficacious than the selective H2-agonists, dimaprit and impromidine. The lack of efficacy for dimaprit and impromidine does not appear to be due to a lack of binding to the receptor because these agents inhibit responses to histamine. For dimaprit, the inhibition was found to be competitive with an apparent pA2 value of 5.37. These results indicate that there is a molecular difference between H2-receptors in mammals versus amphibians.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online