AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 241: G222-G226, 1981;
0193-1857/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardwell, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardwell, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, S.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 241, Issue 3 222-G226, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Properties of the cat ileocecal sphincter muscle

B. A. Cardwell, M. R. Rubin, W. J. Snape Jr and S. Cohen

The purpose of this study was to determine the length-tension properties and the response to neurohumoral agents of the feline ileocecal sphincter (ICS) circular smooth muscle in vitro. The ICS muscle during stretch maintained a higher resting tension at lower degrees of stretch than did the adjacent ileum and colon. Sodium nitroprusside (10(-3) M) or calcium-free Krebs solution with EGTA (5.0 mM) reduced the resting tension of ICS muscle by 15.8 +/- 2.1 and 19.1 +/- 2.5%, respectively. The ICS response to KCl depolarization was lower (0.37 +/- 0.03 kg/cm2) than colonic muscle (0.55 +/- 0.06 kg/cm2) oe ileal muscle (0.51 +/- 0.04 kg/cm2) (P less than 0.05). However, in response to acetylcholine, ICS muscle tension was minimal (0.06 +/- 0.02 kg/cm2) was compared with the colon (0.49 +/- 0.05 kg/cm2) or ileum (0.53 +/- 0.05 kg/cm2) (P less than 0.01). The ICS muscle contracted in response to phenylephrine, whereas other muscles were inhibited. Secretin, gastrin, glucagon, and cholecystokinin failed to act on the ICS muscle while other muscles did respond. These studies suggest that ICS muscle differs from adjacent ileal and colonic circular muscle in that a) in response to stretch it develops a high resting tension that is relatively resistant to calcium withdrawal, and b) it also shows quantitative and qualitative differences in response to neurohumoral agents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
P. G. Dinning, P. A. Bampton, M. L. Kennedy, T. Kajimoto, D. Z. Lubowski, D. J. de Carle, and I. J. Cook
Basal pressure patterns and reflexive motor responses in the human ileocolonic junction
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): G331 - G340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online