AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 242: G416-G422, 1982;
0193-1857/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, J. D.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 242, Issue 4 416-G422, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Structural requirements for action of cholecystokinin on enzyme secretion from pancreatic acini

M. L. Villanueva, S. M. Collins, R. T. Jensen and J. D. Gardner

Using dispersed acini prepared from guinea pig pancreas, we found that the structural requirements for cholecystokinin-induced stimulation of amylase secretion are the same as those for cholecystokinin-induced desensitization of amylase secretion. 1) The relative potencies with which various C-terminal fragments of cholecystokinin cause stimulation are the same as their relative potencies for causing desensitization. 2) With each fragment tested, desensitization occurs with peptide concentrations that are supramaximal for causing stimulation of amylase secretion. 3) Fragments of cholecystokinin less efficacious in causing supramaximal inhibition of amylase secretion are also less efficacious in causing desensitization of amylase secretion. In contrast, there is no obvious fixed relation between the ability of a cholecystokinin fragment to cause stimulation of enzyme secretion and its ability to cause residual stimulation of enzyme secretion. Cholecystokinin and its C-terminal hexadecapeptide are 25-40% more efficacious than the C-terminal decapeptide, octapeptide, and heptapeptide in causing residual stimulation, and the C-terminal pentapeptide and tetrapeptide caused no detectable residual stimulation. The C-terminal tetrapeptide, however, can prevent as well as reverse the residual stimulation caused by other cholecystokinin fragments, and the ability of the tetrapeptide to prevent cholecystokinin-induced residual stimulation is itself fully reversible.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Escrieut, V. Gigoux, E. Archer, S. Verrier, B. Maigret, R. Behrendt, L. Moroder, E. Bignon, S. Silvente-Poirot, L. Pradayrol, et al.
The Biologically Crucial C Terminus of Cholecystokinin and the Non-peptide Agonist SR-146,131 Share a Common Binding Site in the Human CCK1 Receptor. EVIDENCE FOR A CRUCIAL ROLE OF MET-121 IN THE ACTIVATION PROCESS
J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 7546 - 7555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
Y. Li, J. Zhu, and C. Owyang
Electrical physiological evidence for highand low-affinity vagal CCK-A receptors
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 1999; 277(2): G469 - G477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online