AJP - GI  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 247: G279-G283, 1984;
0193-1857/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Granger, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Korthuis, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Granger, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Korthuis, R. J.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 247, Issue 3 279-G283, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Sympathetic stimulation and intestinal capillary fluid exchange

D. N. Granger, J. A. Barrowman, S. L. Harper, P. R. Kvietys and R. J. Korthuis

Sympathetic nerve stimulation is generally considered not to alter intestinal capillary pressure or filtration rate because of appropriate adjustments in the pre-to-postcapillary resistance ratio. To directly assess this possibility, we measured lymph flow, capillary pressure, capillary filtration coefficient, and the transcapillary oncotic pressure gradient in the cat small intestine. Measurements were taken under control conditions and during the steady-state phase of periarterial nerve stimulation, i.e., following completion of the escape phase. Venous outflow pressure was held constant (0 mmHg) during the entire experiment. Nerve stimulation resulted in a significant reduction of lymph flow (by 65%), capillary filtration coefficient (by 75%), and capillary pressure (by 15%). Interstitial fluid pressure, calculated from the measured parameters in the Starling equation, was also reduced (from -0.74 to -2.53 mmHg) by nerve stimulation. The results of this study indicate that intestinal capillary pressure and capillary filtration rate are not "autoregulated" during sympathetic nerve stimulation. Capillary derecruitment appears to be largely responsible for the dramatic reduction in filtration rate associated with adrenergic stimulation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online