AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 248: G98-G102, 1985;
0193-1857/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. T.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 248, Issue 1 98-102, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

N-terminal fragments of CCK-(26-33) as cholecystokinin receptor antagonists in guinea pig pancreatic acini

J. D. Gardner, M. Knight, V. E. Sutliff and R. T. Jensen

In the present study we synthesized different N-terminal fragments and analogues of the C-terminal octapeptide of cholecystokinin [CCK-(26-33)] and examined their actions on dispersed acini prepared from guinea pig pancreas. None of the N-terminal fragments or analogues altered basal amylase release. Analogues of CCK-(26-32), CCK-(26-31), and CCK-(26-30) inhibited CCK-(26-33)-stimulated amylase, and there was a close correlation between the ability of an analogue to inhibit stimulated amylase and the analogue's ability to inhibit binding of 125I-cholecystokinin. N-acetyl-CCK-(26-29)-amide at concentrations as high as 100 microM did not inhibit CCK-(26-33)-stimulated amylase release or binding of 125I-CCK. For those analogues that antagonized CCK-(26-33)-stimulated amylase release the antagonism was of the competitive type and was specific for those secretagogues that interact with the cholecystokinin receptor. Removing the C-terminal amide from N-acetyl-CCK-(26-31)-amide caused a 10-fold decrease in the inhibitory potency, whereas removing the C-terminal amide from N-acetyl-CCK-(26-30)-amide did not alter the inhibitory potency of the peptide. Removing the sulfate ester from the tyrosine residue in position 27 of N-acetyl-CCK-(26-31) did not alter the inhibitory potency of the peptide, whereas removing the sulfate ester from the tyrosine residue in position 27 of N-acetyl-(26-30) caused a three- to fivefold decrease in the inhibitory potency of the peptide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online