AJP - GI Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 248: G485-G493, 1985;
0193-1857/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ammon, H. V.
Right arrow Articles by Walter, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ammon, H. V.
Right arrow Articles by Walter, L. G.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 248, Issue 4 485-G493, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Effects of sulfodeoxycholate on rat and rabbit small intestine

H. V. Ammon, E. J. Tapper, R. A. Komorowski, U. K. Charaf, R. F. Loeffler, D. Lewand and L. G. Walter

To determine how sulfation alters the biological properties of dihydroxy bile acids, we compared the effects of 3-sulfodeoxycholate (SDC) and deoxycholate (DC) in the rat and rabbit intestine. While 5 mM DC induced water and electrolyte secretion and inhibited glucose absorption in the rat, SDC enhanced jejunal and ileal water and solute absorption. SDC had no effect in the rabbit ileum. In the rat jejunum DC caused mucosal injury and enhanced mucosal permeability while SDC had no effect. In vitro in the rabbit ileum, 10 mM SDC enhanced net sodium flux and decreased net residual flux, while 0.5 mM DC reduced net sodium flux and induced Cl- secretion. Both bile acids increased short-circuit current and potential difference and decreased tissue conductance. During reversed-phase, high-performance liquid chromatography SDC was more polar than DC. Sulfation reduced the ability of DC to destroy large unilamellar liposomes by a factor of 10. Thus, sulfation abolishes the effects of DC on the intestine by enhancing the polarity of this molecule. The enhancement of intestinal solute and water absorption by SDC requires further study.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
N. B. Campbell, C. G. Ruaux, D. E. Shifflett, J. M. Steiner, D. A. Williams, and A. T. Blikslager
Physiological concentrations of bile salts inhibit recovery of ischemic-injured porcine ileum
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): G399 - G407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online