AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 248: G663-G669, 1985;
0193-1857/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Misbin, R. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Misbin, R. I.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 248, Issue 6 663-G669, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Preferential binding of vasoactive intestinal peptide to hepatic nonparenchymal cells

D. F. Gardner, M. S. Kilberg, M. M. Wolfe, J. E. McGuigan and R. I. Misbin

The binding of 125I-vasoactive intestinal peptide (125I-VIP) and 125I-insulin has been examined in highly enriched populations of rat hepatocytes and hepatic nonparenchymal cells. 125I-VIP bound to high-affinity sites (Ka = 1.7 X 10(9) M-1) in nonparenchymal cells. Specific binding in these cells was nearly fivefold greater than in hepatocytes (15.0 +/- 0.6% vs. 3.6 +/- 0.7% radioactivity bound per 4 X 10(5) cells). In contrast, 125I-insulin binding was similar in both cell populations (18.2 +/- 2.4% per 4 X 10(5) cells in hepatocytes vs. 17.1 +/- 1.0% in nonparenchymal cells). Glucagon and insulin had no effect on 125I-VIP binding in nonparenchymal cells. Secretin inhibited 125I-VIP binding but was only about 1% as potent as unlabeled VIP. VIP had no apparent effect on cAMP levels in either cell population, whereas glucagon increased cAMP levels in both cell types. Our findings suggest that VIP binds preferentially to hepatic nonparenchymal cells and that these cells are primarily responsible for the clearance of VIP from the portal circulation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online