AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 249: G528-G532, 1985;
0193-1857/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lebrec, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lebrec, D.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 249, Issue 4 528-G532, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of pentobarbital sodium anesthesia on splanchnic hemodynamics of normal and portal-hypertensive rats

S. S. Lee, C. Girod, D. Valla, P. Geoffroy and D. Lebrec

To determine the effect of pentobarbital sodium anesthesia on the rat with portal hypertension due to portal vein stenosis, four groups of rats were studied. Cardiac output and regional blood flow were measured by radioactive microspheres in anesthetized and conscious sham-operated and portal-hypertensive rats. Anesthesia markedly decreased cardiac output in both sham-operated (109.7 +/- 4.6 vs. 77.8 +/- 1.4 ml/min, P less than 0.001) and portal-hypertensive rats (130.1 +/- 7.6 vs. 93.8 +/- 5.3 ml/min, P less than 0.01). In spite of this diminution in cardiac output, pentobarbital did not significantly change absolute blood flow values of splanchnic organs in either group. However, the fractions of cardiac output perfusing the splanchnic organs were significantly increased by pentobarbital in both groups because of the decrease in cardiac output: sham operated, anesthetized, 22.86 +/- 1.19% vs. conscious, 14.83 +/- 1.02%, P less than 0.001; and portal hypertensive, anesthetized, 26.67 +/- 0.71% vs. conscious, 19.07 +/- 1.44%, P less than 0.001. The hyperdynamic circulation of the portal vein-stenosed rat compared with the sham-operated rat continued to manifest itself with significantly increased portal pressure, cardiac output, and splanchnic blood flow, whether the animal was anesthetized or awake. We conclude that, despite marked hemodynamic changes induced by pentobarbital, the rat with portal vein stenosis remains a useful experimental model of portal hypertension.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online