AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 250: G205-G212, 1986;
0193-1857/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sikuler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Groszmann, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sikuler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Groszmann, R. J.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 250, Issue 2 205-G212, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Interaction of flow and resistance in maintenance of portal hypertension in a rat model

E. Sikuler and R. J. Groszmann

To clarify the roles that portocollateral resistance ("backward-flow" theory) and portal flow ("forward-flow" theory) play in maintaining chronic portal hypertension, we studied, in a rat model with prehepatic portal hypertension, the hemodynamic changes that occur when portocollateral resistance is reduced and high portal venous inflow is maintained. In 30 portal-hypertensive rats the constriction around the portal vein was removed 4 days after induction of portal hypertension, 30 rats were used as portal vein-constricted controls, and 30 additional rats were subjected to a sham operation. The removal of the ligature constricting the portal vein was followed by an immediate decrease in portal pressure (from 16.3 +/- 0.8 to 9.6 +/- 0.8 mmHg, P less than 0.001). Two days after the ligature removal, hyperdynamic circulation was still evident and was characterized by a decreased splanchnic arteriolar resistance and an increased portal venous inflow. The coexistence of high portal venous inflow and normal portal pressure indicates that high portal venous inflow per se is not sufficient to produce an increase in portal pressure when it faces a low-resistance vascular bed. We conclude that portal hypertension is induced by the interaction of an abnormally high portal venous inflow and high resistance offered to the flow by the portocollateral vessels. Neither the forward-flow theory nor the backward-flow theory can be applied solely to explain the increased portal pressure.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online