AJP - GI Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 255: G162-G167, 1988;
0193-1857/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Womack, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Granger, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Womack, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Granger, D. N.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 255, Issue 2 162-G167, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Neurohumoral control of villous motility

W. A. Womack, D. Mailman, P. R. Kvietys and D. N. Granger
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688.

A quantitative videomicroscopic method was used to examine neurohumoral control of villous motility. Intraduodenal instillation of saline, 0.4% hydrochloric acid, or acidified predigested food did not cause a significant change in villous contraction frequency in an isolated segment of jejunum. Villous motility in the jejunum of fed dogs, from which the chyme had been removed, was not greater than that in fasted dogs (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.5 contractions/min). Furthermore, acid extracts of the duodenal mucosa did not produce an increase in jejunal villous motility when injected intravenously. These data argue against the existence of a humoral stimulant of villous motility (villikinin). Vagotomy caused only a small (20%) and transient (10 min) decline in villous motility. Vagal stimulation at 5, 10, and 20 Hz caused villous motility to increase by 24 +/- 7, 23 +/- 9, and 32 +/- 10%, respectively. Atropine blocked the effects of vagal stimulation. Section of the periarterial (sympathetic) nerves did not alter villous contractile activity. Stimulation of the periarterial nerves at 5, 10, and 20 Hz caused villous contraction frequency to decline by 41 +/- 5, 45 +/- 5, and 38 +/- 10%, respectively. This inhibition appears to involve both alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors and a reduction in blood flow. Neither atropine, alpha-blockade, nor beta-blockade produced a sustained alteration in basal contraction frequency.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online