AJP - GI AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 255: G794-G799, 1988;
0193-1857/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Castell, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Castell, D. O.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 255, Issue 6 794-G799, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

On-line computer analysis of human lower esophageal sphincter relaxation

J. A. Castell, C. B. Dalton and D. O. Castell
Department of Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103.

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation is usually interpreted by a subjective, mostly qualitative analysis. We studied sphincter relaxation in humans using a computer program for on-line analysis that provides objective measures of gastric pressure, resting LES pressure, percent of relaxation, residual pressure during relaxation, duration of relaxation, and area of relaxation. The program was validated by comparing computer-analyzed values to mean values obtained from manual readings by five individuals. Excellent correlation was obtained for all standard parameters. The parameters of LES relaxation for both wet and dry swallows were similar using either a carefully placed single recording orifice or a Dent sleeve. The one exception was the duration of LES relaxation, which was significantly shorter with the sleeve. All relaxation parameters and peristaltic velocity were then studied in 10 volunteers during 5 dry and 5 wet swallows under base-line conditions and after both atropine (10 micrograms/kg iv) and bethanechol (40 micrograms/kg sc). These studies showed that LES relaxation is affected by type of swallow (dry vs. wet). Percent of relaxation may not be the best measure of relaxation because it is too dependent on resting pressure. Residual pressure is not dependent on base-line pressure and may better define relaxation. Duration of the relaxation is dependent on the velocity of the peristaltic wave.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. L. Shepherd, R. H. Holloway, D. R. Hillman, and P. R. Eastwood
The impact of continuous positive airway pressure on the lower esophageal sphincter
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): G1200 - G1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
A. J. Bredenoord, B. L. A. M. Weusten, R. Timmer, and A. J. P. M. Smout
Sleeve sensor versus high-resolution manometry for the detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): G1190 - G1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
F. Mearin and J.-R. Malagelada
Complete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation observed in some achalasia patients is functionally inadequate
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2000; 278(3): G376 - G383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online