AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 256: G653-G660, 1989;
0193-1857/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farges, O.
Right arrow Articles by Erlinger, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farges, O.
Right arrow Articles by Erlinger, S.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 256, Issue 4 653-G660, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Permeability of the rat biliary tree to ursodeoxycholic acid

O. Farges, M. Corbic, M. Dumont, M. Maurice and S. Erlinger
Unite de Recherches de Physiopathologie Hepatique Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France.

The permeability of the biliary epithelium to [14C]ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a hypercholeretic bile acid, was compared to that of the 14C-labeled nonhypercholeretic bile acids cholic acid (CA), taurocholic acid (TCA), and tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) by means of anterograde intrabiliary infusions and retrograde intrabiliary injections in the anesthetized rat. Anterograde intrabiliary infusions were performed by perfusing an isolated segment of common bile duct in vivo. After anterograde intrabiliary infusions, the fraction of unrecovered UDCA (that had presumably been absorbed from the biliary lumen) was 11.03 +/- 1.03 (SE)% (n = 6) of the administered dose. It was significantly higher than that of TUDCA (1.25 +/- 0.27%; n = 5; P less than 0.01), CA (2.62 +/- 0.43%; n = 4; P less than 0.01), and TCA (2.57 +/- 0.79%; n = 6; P less than 0.01). In separate experiments, bile was collected from the common bile duct and from the left hepatic duct. UDCA recovered from the left hepatic duct was found in the conjugated form, indicating that, after absorption in the common bile duct, it had been conjugated by the hepatocyte and secreted into bile. After retrograde intrabiliary injections of UDCA and CA, the cumulative percentages of recovered radioactivity were not significantly different (84.50 +/- 2.65 and 87.33 +/- 1.80%, respectively); however, peak recovery of UDCA was significantly delayed compared with that of CA. Moreover, UDCA was recovered mostly in the conjugated form, while CA was recovered mostly in the unconjugated form. These results suggest that, in the rat, UDCA is significantly more absorbed by the biliary tree than CA, TUDCA, and TCA. They support the hypothesis that UDCA undergoes a cholehepatic circulation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online