AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 259: G147-G154, 1990;
0193-1857/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yonei, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Guth, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yonei, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Guth, P. H.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 259, Issue 1 147-G154, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist on LTC4 vasoconstriction in rat stomach

Y. Yonei and P. H. Guth
Research Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center West Los Angeles, California.

With the use of an in vivo microscopy technique in anesthetized-laparotomized rats, the effect of L660,711, a cysteinyl-leukotriene (LT) receptor antagonist, on the gastric submucosal microvascular response to leukotrienes was studied. The direct application of 50-400 nM LTC4 onto the exposed submucosal vasculature caused constriction of both arterioles (maximum constriction: 24 +/- 3%) and venules (26 +/- 3%), whereas LTD4 had no significant effect. Pretreatment with 5 mg/kg L660,711 intragastrically significantly attenuated the LTC4-induced vasoconstriction. The submucosal application of 2 x 10(-7) to 2 x 10(-2) M L660,711 dose dependently inhibited the 400 nM LTC4-induced vasoconstriction. The IC50 of L660,711, preapplied to the gastric submucosa for 15 min, was 4.4 x 10(-4) M in arterioles and 3.9 x 10(-4) M in venules, and 3.6 x 10(-5) M and 3.2 x 10(-5) M, respectively, when it was applied simultaneously with LTC4. Schild plot analysis revealed that L660,711 was not a pure competitive receptor antagonist. L660,711 had no significant effects on epinephrine- or vasopressin-induced arteriolar constriction. In conclusion, L660,711 significantly antagonizes the gastric microvascular effects of LTC4, but not those of other vasoconstrictors, and appears to be a useful new tool for studying LTC4 effects.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online