AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 261: G171-G184, 1991;
0193-1857/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baldi, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baldi, J. P.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 261, Issue 2 171-G184, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Can regulatory peptides be regarded as words of a biological language

E. A. Mayer and J. P. Baldi
Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.

Despite the complexities of individual systems, neurocrine, endocrine, and growth factor-mediated signaling systems show striking similarities in the molecules they use for communication and in their signal-transduction mechanisms. In contrast to the traditional view in cell biology, which has focused on the regulatory aspects of neurocrine and endocrine messengers and growth factors, an analysis of various aspects of peptidergic cell-to-cell communication on the basis of information theory is suggested. According to theorems for efficient and error-free encoding, the differences in rate and distance of information transfer and in noise interference between neurocrine, endocrine, and growth factor-mediated messages require different encoding strategies. These differences are reflected in the use of plurichemical transmission (to increase information content) or in the number and sequence of amino acids within peptide molecules (to protect against noise interference). In contrast to the quantitative information content, the qualitative information of the messages is not transmitted but is retrieved when the message interacts with transduction networks at the receiver cell. The semantic information is contained within the rules specifying the conditional co-occurrences of signals. The suggested analysis provides a framework for the understanding of various aspects of cell-to-cell communication, such as structure-function relationship of regulatory peptides, multiple receptor subtypes, plurichemical transmission, and transduction networks. The data discussed are consistent with the role of regulatory peptides as signals in a universal structured code for biological communication.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. D. Todorov, S. T. Mihaylova-Todorova, R. A. Bjur, and D. P. Westfall
Differential Cotransmission in Sympathetic Nerves: Role of Frequency of Stimulation and Prejunctional Autoreceptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 1999; 290(1): 241 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online