AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 262: G510-G516, 1992;
0193-1857/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lautt, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Legare, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lautt, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Legare, D. J.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 262, Issue 3 510-G516, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Evaluation of hepatic venous resistance responses using index of contractility

W. W. Lautt and D. J. Legare
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Hepatic vascular responses to 1.25 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 norepinephrine, infused into the hepatic artery, and 8-Hz nerve stimulation were monitored in anesthetized cats using a recently introduced index of contractility (IC). IC was validated in that it did not change passively in response to passive changes in portal flow or distending blood pressure, whereas the distensible venous resistance sites showed dramatic changes in resistance. Resistance is altered by both active contractile responses and passive distensibility; IC is not altered passively but is affected by changes in vascular tone. Resistance was a less sensitive index of vasoconstriction because, although the constriction increased resistance, the subsequent elevation in portal and intrahepatic pressure counteracted the constriction; the extent of active neurogenic response using resistance as the index was grossly underestimated due to venous distensibility. IC showed that pre- and postsinusoidal constriction occurred to both norepinephrine and nerves; extensive vascular escape from neurogenic constriction occurred for the portal vein so that by 5 min almost all the rise in portal pressure was due to hepatic venous constriction.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online