AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 265: G196-G203, 1993;
0193-1857/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bancewicz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bancewicz, J.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 265, Issue 1 196-G203, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Responses of the human esophagus to experimental intraluminal distension

D. Williams, D. G. Thompson, L. Heggie and J. Bancewicz
Department of Medicine, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom.

Contractile and propulsive forces generated in response to intraluminal distension of the human esophagus were measured in 30 volunteers with the use of a novel intraluminal catheter assembly. Distension was achieved by graded inflation of a balloon for periods of 30 s using volumes of air varying between 0 and 12 ml. In the lower esophagus, distension above a threshold volume of 5 (3-10) ml (median and interquartile range) induced a traction force together with contractile activity proximal to the balloon and quiescence distally. Proximal contractile activity and aboral traction force increased with increasing inflation volume, the magnitude of the response being additionally dependent on the site and the length of esophageal wall stimulated. Although the threshold for induction of motor responses was similar at different distension sites, the magnitude of both contractile and traction responses was higher in the distal than in the midesophagus. In the upper esophagus, the contractions induced proximal to the distension propagated aborally, whereas in the lower esophagus nonpropagating proximal contractions were induced. With the use of a dual balloon technique, it was possible to demonstrate that the distal quiescence represented a true descending inhibitory response since inflation of a proximal balloon suppressed the contractile response induced by a distal balloon. These results thus provide a description of the human esophageal response to distension against which responses in disease states can be compared.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
C. Gao, L. Arendt-Nielsen, W. Liu, P. Petersen, A. M. Drewes, and H. Gregersen
Sensory and biomechanical responses to ramp-controlled distension of the human duodenum
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): G461 - G471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
J. D. Barlow, H. Gregersen, and D. G. Thompson
Identification of the biomechanical factors associated with the perception of distension in the human esophagus
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): G683 - G689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
Y. Yamamoto, J. Liu, T. K. Smith, and R. K. Mittal
Distension-related responses in circular and longitudinal muscle of the human esophagus: an ultrasonographic study
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 1998; 275(4): G805 - G811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online