AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 265: G514-G520, 1993;
0193-1857/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lopez Solis, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Alliende, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lopez Solis, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Alliende, C.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 265, Issue 3 514-G520, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Transcriptional and posttranscriptional control in synthesis of growth marker polypeptides in mouse parotids

R. O. Lopez Solis, M. J. Gonzalez, L. Castillo, S. Pena y Lillo and C. Alliende
Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago.

The chronic daily administration of isoproterenol provokes in mouse parotid glands the induction and progressive accumulation of a family of secretory polypeptides named polypeptides C, D, E, F, and G (polypeptides C-G). These polypeptides, which seem to be part of the family of proline-rich proteins, have been considered as molecular markers of the growth-in-size response in the mouse parotid acinar cells. In the present study, two pharmacological approaches were used to determine whether the induction and the postsecretory reappearance of polypeptides C-G may be distinguished from each other. First, actinomycin D, a transcriptional inhibitor, was found to interfere with the induction by isoproterenol but not with the postsecretory reappearance. Second, pilocarpine, a secretagogue that was found to be a very weak inducer of polypeptides C-G, was able to provoke secretion and then reappearance of the whole group of isoproterenol-induced polypeptides. Accordingly, these data suggest that the induction of polypeptides C-G is dependent on transcriptional activity and that it is unrelated to secretion stimulation. By contrast, the postsecretory reappearance of polypeptides C-G may occur even when transcriptional activity is inhibited and it would be related to the secretory activity.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online