AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 265: G672-G676, 1993;
0193-1857/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, J. H.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 265, Issue 4 672-G676, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Nutrient feedback inhibition of gastric emptying plays a larger role than osmotically dependent duodenal resistance

H. C. Lin, J. D. Elashoff, Y. G. Gu and J. H. Meyer
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles 90048.

The slowing of gastric emptying by hyperosmolar solutions has been postulated to result from the triggering of duodenal osmoreceptor feedback on the stomach. We tested the idea that the inhibition of gastric emptying by a hyperosmolar solution depended on the duodenal resistance and the triggering of nutrient-specific feedback by tracking gastric emptying of 300 and 1,200 mosmol/kgH2O test solutions in 12 dogs in which duodenal resistance was either removed (by temporarily diverting chyme from uncorked duodenal fistula) or preserved (by keeping duodenal fistula corked). Mannitol was used to test osmolality alone, and glucose was used to examine the combined effects of osmolality and nutrient-specific inhibitory feedback. We found that: 1) the slowing effect of hyperosmolality was more marked with the duodenal resistance preserved (P < 0.05; analysis of variance), 2) the slowing effect of glucose was greater than that of mannitol for all conditions (P = 0.01; analysis of variance), and 3) the inhibitory effect of mannitol was localized to the duodenum. We conclude that inhibition of gastric emptying by hyperosmolar mannitol depended primarily on duodenal resistance, while the inhibitory effect of hyperosmolar glucose depended on nutrient-specific feedback on the stomach more than duodenal resistance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online