AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 268: G650-G662, 1995;
0193-1857/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N. S.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 268, Issue 4 650-G662, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Prolonged ambulatory canine colonic motility

S. M. Scott, M. A. Pilot, T. G. Barnett and N. S. Williams
Surgical Research Unit, Royal London Hospital, United Kingdom.

Canine gastrointestinal motility is studied at present in animals confined to a small cage or sling. The aims of this study were to record colonic activity over a 24-h period in eight dogs by an ambulatory method. Motility signals from implanted strain gauges were processed and stored via a portable battery-operated amplifier and digital recorder housed in a jacket. Ambulant interdigestive activity was the same as observed in laboratory experiments, with migrating colonic motor complexes (CMCs) and infrequent giant contractions (GCs). Feeding caused a multiphasic alteration in motility for 582.1 +/- 18.1 min (mean +/- SE). There were four distinct phases. During the "early" (0-2 h) postprandial period, phase 1 (mean duration: 55.1 +/- 4.0 min), which was distinguished by CMCs of high frequency and elevated amplitude in the proximal colon, and phase 2 (78.2 +/- 6.2 min), which had CMC characteristics similar to those in the interdigestive period, occurred. Phase 3 (218.8 +/- 13.6 min), a further period of increased motility, and phase 4 (339.1 +/- 14.0 min), characterized by low-amplitude long-duration CMCs, occurred during the "late" (2 h onward) postprandial response. With the exception of phase 3, postprandial phases were not always present following food intake, and their expression was markedly influenced by variations in meal time and by defecation immediately following feeding. Spontaneous defecation was characterized by a variety of motor profiles, with a GC accompanying two-thirds of episodes. We conclude that a more complete picture of canine colonic motility has been documented because of the development of the ambulatory system.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online