AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 275: G187-G191, 1998;
0193-1857/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, S. S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, S. S. C.
Vol. 275, Issue 2, G187-G191, August 1998

Biomechanical and sensory parameters of the human esophagus at four levels

Rig S. Patel and Satish S. C. Rao

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

The biomechanical and sensory characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and those of the striated and smooth muscle portions of the esophagus have not been compared in humans. Our aim was to determine sensory perception, cross-sectional area (CSA), and biomechanical parameters at different levels of the esophagus. We studied 11 healthy volunteers, using impedance planimetry. Intermittent balloon distensions (5-60 cmH2O) were performed at four sites: 1) the LES, 2) 5 cm above LES (distal), 3) 10 cm above LES (mid), and 4) 5 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter (proximal). During these distensions, CSAs, biomechanical parameters, and sensory responses were measured. The mid-esophagus had a higher (P < 0.05) CSA than the distal esophagus. The LES had the smallest CSA (P < 0.05). The LES and the proximal esophagus had greater (P < 0.05) wall tension and were less (P < 0.05) deformable than the mid- or distal esophagus. Sensory thresholds were lower (P < 0.05) in the proximal compared with the mid- or distal esophagus. Biomechanical and sensory parameters are not uniform along the length of the esophagus. The striated muscle portion is more sensitive and less compliant than the smooth muscle portion. These differences could affect the results of balloon distension tests of the esophagus.

impedance planimetry


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
B. P. McMahon, J. B. Frokjaer, P. Kunwald, D. Liao, P. Funch-Jensen, A. M. Drewes, and H. Gregersen
The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for evaluation of the esophagogastric junction
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): G377 - G384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
T. Takeda, G. Kassab, J. Liu, J. L. Puckett, R. R. Mittal, and R. K. Mittal
A novel ultrasound technique to study the biomechanics of the human esophagus in vivo
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): G785 - G793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online