AJP - GI Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 275: G460-G466, 1998;
0193-1857/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorelick, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hasler, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gorelick, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hasler, W. L.
Vol. 275, Issue 3, G460-G466, September 1998

Differential effects of amitriptyline on perception of somatic and visceral stimulation in healthy humans

Adam B. Gorelick, Sherin S. Koshy, Forrest G. Hooper, Todd C. Bennett, William D. Chey, and William L. Hasler

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Tricyclic antidepressants treat chronic pain both in patients with somatic illness and with functional bowel disorders. We compared the effects of amitriptyline on perception of cutaneous and gastrointestinal stimulation to assess differential analgesic effects of tricyclics on somatic and visceral pain. Cutaneous electrical stimulation and rectal and esophageal distension were performed before and after 21 days of double-blind 50 mg amitriptyline vs. placebo in healthy volunteers. Amitriptyline increased currents that elicited cutaneous threshold, moderate discomfort, and moderate pain compared with basal (P < 0.05), whereas placebo had no effect. Amitriptyline had no effect on perception of rectal and esophageal distension and did not alter luminal compliance; thus the lack of effect on perception is not due to altered visceral elastic wall properties. In conclusion, amitriptyline reduces perception of cutaneous stimulation but does not alter visceral perception or compliance. This investigation demonstrates differential effects of tricyclics on somatic and visceral afferent function in healthy humans and provides insight into mechanisms of action in chronic pain both from somatic disease and from functional bowel disorders.

gastrointestinal motility; luminal distension; functional colonic disorders; irritable bowel syndrome; chest pain


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
H. J. Chial, M. Camilleri, D. Burton, G. Thomforde, K. W. Olden, and D. Stephens
Selective effects of serotonergic psychoactive agents on gastrointestinal functions in health
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): G130 - G137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GutHome page
J Tack and G Sarnelli
Serotonergic modulation of visceral sensation: upper gastrointestinal tract
Gut, July 1, 2002; 51(90001): i77 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 GutHome page
M Camilleri
Serotonergic modulation of visceral sensation: lower gut
Gut, July 1, 2002; 51(90001): i81 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 GutHome page
R Spiller
Pharmacotherapy: non-serotonergic mechanisms
Gut, July 1, 2002; 51(90001): i87 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 GutHome page
J Fioramonti and L Bueno
Centrally acting agents and visceral sensitivity
Gut, July 1, 2002; 51(90001): i91 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online