HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 290/1/G23    most recent 00303.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by L'Heureux, M.-C. Articles by Diamant, N. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by L'Heureux, M.-C. Articles by Diamant, N. E.

NEUROREGULATION AND MOTILITY

Feline lower esophageal sphincter sling and circular muscles have different functional inhibitory neuronal responses

Departments of ¹Physiology and ²Medicine, University of Toronto, and ³Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 4 July 2005 ; accepted in final form 9 September 2005

The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has a circular muscle component exhibiting spontaneous tone that is relaxed by nitric oxide (NO) and a low-tone sling muscle that contracts vigorously to cholinergic stimulation but with little or no evidence of NO responsiveness. This study dissected the responses of the sling muscle to nitrergic innervation in relationship to its cholinergic innervation and circular muscle responses. Motor responses were induced by electrical field stimulation (EFS; 1–30 Hz) of muscle strips from sling and circular regions of the feline LES in the presence of cholinergic receptor inhibition (atropine) or NO synthase inhibition [N^G-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) ± atropine]. This study showed the following. First, sling muscle developed less intrinsic resting tone compared with circular muscle. Second, with EFS, sling muscle contracted (most at 10 Hz), whereas circular muscle relaxed >50% by 5 Hz. Third, on neural blockade with atropine or L-NNA ± atropine, 1) sling muscle, although predominantly influenced by excitatory cholinergic stimulation, had a small neural NO-mediated inhibition, with no significant non-NO-mediated inhibition and 2) circular muscle, although little affected by cholinergic influence, underwent relaxation predominantly by neural release of NO and some non-NO inhibitory influence (at higher EFS frequency). Fourth, the sling, precontracted with bethanecol, could relax with NO and some non-NO inhibition. Finally, the tension range of both muscles is similar. In conclusion, sling muscle has limited NO-mediated inhibition to potentially augment or replace sling relaxation effected by switching off its cholinergic excitation. Differences within the LES sling and circular muscles could provide new directions for therapy of LES disorders.

circular muscle; nitric oxide; acetylcholine; sling muscle

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. P. Sanmiguel, M. Hagiike, M. P. Mintchev, R. D. Cruz, E. H. Phillips, S. A. Cunneen, J. L. Conklin, and E. E. Soffer Effect of electrical stimulation of the LES on LES pressure in a canine model Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): G389 - G394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Brasseur, R. Ulerich, Q. Dai, D. K. Patel, A. M. S. Soliman, and L. S. Miller Pharmacological dissection of the human gastro-oesophageal segment into three sphincteric components J. Physiol., May 1, 2007; 580(3): 961 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]