|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INFLAMMATION/IMMUNITY/MEDIATORS
by luminal glutamine and iNOS by luminal arginine in the rodent postischemic small bowel
Departments of 1Surgery, 2Medicine, and 3Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, Houston School of Medicine, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
Submitted 31 May 2005 ; accepted in final form 7 October 2005
Using a rodent model of gut ischemia-reperfusion (I/R), we have previously shown that the induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is harmful, whereas the induction of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR-
) is protective. In the present study, we hypothesized that the luminal nutrients arginine and glutamine differentially modulate these molecular events in the postischemic gut. Jejunal sacs were created in rats at laparotomy, filled with either 60 mM glutamine, arginine, or magnesium sulfate (osmotic control) followed by 60 min of superior mesenteric artery occlusion and 6 h of reperfusion, and compared with shams. The jejunum was harvested for histology or myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity (inflammation). Heat shock proteins and iNOS were quantitated by Western blot analysis and PPAR-
by DNA binding activity. In some experiments, rats were pretreated with the PPAR-
inhibitor G9662 or with the iNOS inhibitor N-[3(aminomethyl)benzyl]acetamidine (1400W). iNOS was significantly increased by arginine but not by glutamine following gut I/R and was associated with increased MPO activity and mucosal injury. On the other hand, PPAR-
was significantly increased by glutamine but decreased by arginine, whereas heat shock proteins were similarly increased in all experimental groups. The PPAR-
inhibitor G9662 abrogated the protective effects of glutamine, whereas the iNOS inhibitor 1400W attenuated the injurious effects of arginine. We concluded that luminal arginine and glutamine differentially modulate the molecular events that regulate injurious I/R-mediated gut inflammation and injury. The induction of PPAR-
by luminal glutamine is a novel protective mechanism, whereas luminal arginine appears harmful to the postischemic gut due to enhanced expression of iNOS.
gut ischemia-reperfusion; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
; inducible nitric oxide synthase
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Ban and R. A. Kozar Enteral glutamine: a novel mediator of PPAR{gamma} in the postischemic gut J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2008; 84(3): 595 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Robinson, D. P. Kelly, D. W. Mercer, and R. A. Kozar Differential Effects of Luminal Arginine and Glutamine on Metalloproteinase Production in the Postischemic Gut JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 2008; 32(4): 433 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. McQuiggan, R. Kozar, R. M. Sailors, C. Ahn, B. McKinley, and F. Moore Enteral Glutamine During Active Shock Resuscitation Is Safe and Enhances Tolerance of Enteral Feeding JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 28 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Dubuquoy, C Rousseaux, X Thuru, L Peyrin-Biroulet, O Romano, P Chavatte, M Chamaillard, and P Desreumaux PPAR{gamma} as a new therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut, September 1, 2006; 55(9): 1341 - 1349. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |