HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 290/6/G1164    most recent 00487.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bharucha, A. E. Articles by An, K.-N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bharucha, A. E. Articles by An, K.-N.

NEUROREGULATION AND MOTILITY

Comparison of rectoanal axial forces in health and functional defecatory disorders

¹Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, ²Division of Gynecologic Surgery, ³Orthopedics Biomechanics Laboratory, and ⁴Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Submitted 12 October 2005 ; accepted in final form 23 January 2006

Anal manometry measures circumferential pressures but not axial forces that are responsible for defecation and contribute to fecal continence. Our aims were to investigate these mechanisms by measuring axial rectoanal forces with an intrarectal sphere or a latex balloon fixed at 8, 6, or 4 cm from the anal verge and connected to axial force and displacement transducers. Rectoanal forces and rectal pressures within a latex balloon were measured at baseline (i.e., at rest) and during maneuvers (i.e., squeeze, simulated evacuation, and a Valsalva maneuver) in 12 asymptomatic women and 12 women with symptoms of difficult defecation. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were also assessed by manometry and were similar in control patients and experimental patients. At rest, axial rectoanal forces were directed inward and increased as the device approached the anal verge. Control patients augmented this inward force when they squeezed and exerted an outward force during simulated expulsion and a Valsalva maneuver. The force change during maneuvers was also affected by device location and was highest at 4 cm from the verge. In experimental patients, the force at rest and the change in force during all maneuvers was lower than in control patients. The rectal pressure during a Valsalva maneuver was also lower in experimental patients than in control patients, suggestive of impaired propulsion. In conclusion, a subset of women with defecatory symptoms had weaker axial forces not only during expulsion but also during a Valsalva maneuver and when they squeezed (i.e., contracted) their pelvic floor muscles, suggestive of generalized pelvic floor weakness.

anal pressures; axial force; manometry; defecation; continence