HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 293/5/G1023    most recent 00384.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ghosh, S. K. Articles by Pandolfino, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ghosh, S. K. Articles by Pandolfino, J. E.

NEUROREGULATION AND MOTILITY

Utilizing intraluminal pressure differences to predict esophageal bolus flow dynamics

Department of Medicine, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 17 August 2007 ; accepted in final form 13 September 2007

Successful esophageal emptying depends on the generation of a sustained intrabolus pressure (IBP) sufficient to overcome esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction. Our aim was to develop a manometric analysis paradigm that describes the bolus driving pressure difference and the flow permissive time for esophageal bolus transit. Twenty normal subjects were studied with a 36-channel manometry assembly (1-cm spacing) during two 5- and one 10-ml barium swallows and concurrent fluoroscopy. Bolus domain pressure plots were generated by plotting bolus domain pressure (BDP) and EGJ relaxation pressure. BDP was defined as the pressure midway between the peristaltic ramp-up and the proximal margin of the EGJ. The flow permissive time was defined as the period where the BDP was EGJ relaxation pressure. The mean BDP was 11.7 ± 1.0 mmHg (SE), and the mean flow permissive time was 3.9 ± 0.4 s for 5-ml swallows in normal controls. The mean BDP difference during flow was 4.0 ± 1.0 mmHg. There was no significant difference in the fluoroscopic transit time and the flow permissive time calculated from the BDP plots (5 ml: fluoroscopy 3.4 ± 0.2 s; BDP 3.9 ± 0.4 s, P > 0.05). BDP plots provide a reliable measurement of IBP and its relationship with EGJ relaxation. The time available for flow can be readily delineated from this analysis, and the driving pressure responsible for flow can be accurately described and quantified. This may help predict abnormal bolus transit and the underlying mechanical properties of the EGJ.

esophageal emptying; high-resolution manometry; fluoroscopy; intraluminal pressure gradients