|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Biomedical Science, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN; 2 GlaxoSmithKline, Gastrointestinal Department, Neurology CEDD, New Frontiers Science Park, Harlow CM19 5AW; 4 Laboratory of Cognitive and Developmental Neuroscience, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge, CB2 4AT, United Kingdom; and 3 Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Somatostatin [somatotropin release-inhibitory factor (SRIF)] has widespread actions throughout the gastrointestinal tract, but the receptor mechanisms involved are not fully characterized. We have examined the effect of selective SRIF-receptor ligands on intestinal peristalsis by studying migrating motor complexes (MMCs) in isolated segments of jejunum from rats, mice, and sst2-receptor knockout mice. MMCs were recorded in 4- to 5-cm segments of jejunum mounted horizontally in vitro. MMCs occurred in rat and mouse jejunum with intervals of 104.4 ± 10 and 131.2 ± 8 s, respectively. SRIF, octreotide, and BIM-23027 increased the interval between MMCs, an effect fully or partially antagonized by the sst2-receptor antagonist Cyanamid154806. A non-sst2 receptor-mediated component was evident in mouse as confirmed by the observation of an inhibitory action of SRIF in sst2 knockout tissue. Blocking nitric oxide generation abolished the response to SRIF in rat but not mouse jejunum. sst2 Receptors mediate inhibition of peristalsis in both rat and mouse jejunum, but a non-sst2 component also exists in the mouse. Nitrergic mechanisms are differentially involved in rat and mouse jejunum.
knockout; migrating motor complex; enteric nervous system; somatotropin release-inhibitory factor
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ISOLATED SEGMENTS OF BOWEL can perform complex and coordinated contractile activity, which is dependent on interactions between myogenic and local neural mechanisms. The polarized reflex responses to intestinal stimuli, first described by Bayliss and Starling (3), are now recognized to involve activation of ascending and descending enteric pathways leading to contraction and relaxation of smooth muscle (6). A variety of different transmitters and neuromodulators in these enteric pathways contributes to the coordination of this peristaltic activity. Somatostatin [somatotropin release-inhibitory factor (SRIF)] is present in a subpopulation of descending interneurones that project caudally within the myenteric plexus but not into either the longitudinal or circular muscle layers of the intestine (10, 31, 35). SRIF is also found in submucous plexus neurones, around submucosal blood vessels, and is present in mucosal endocrine cells in human (31), guinea pig (10), and rodent intestine (12, 13). SRIF is released by intestinal distension (11) and participates in the coordination of descending relaxation (21). The effects of exogenous SRIF on intestinal motility are complex. In the guinea pig ileum, both excitatory and inhibitory effects, operating through prejunctional mechanisms (14, 18, 24, 36, 45), have been described. The contractile response of the rat colon to SRIF also appears to involve activation of noncholinergic nerves (33), possibly by a process of disinhibition of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) ergic/nitrergic interneurones supplying longitudinal muscle motoneurones (22). In contrast, the activity of VIPergic/nitregic neurons supplying the circular muscle layer is augmented by SRIF leading to relaxation (21). Thus SRIF plays a neuromodulatory role by regulating transmitter release (45), although postjunctional effects on enteric neuronal excitability have also been described (30, 34).
The diverse effects of SRIF are mediated by specific, high-affinity, membrane-bound receptors termed sst1-5 (28). Expression of all five of these receptors has been described in the wall of the gastrointestinal tract (32). A number of synthetic peptides have been identified that displays selectivity for recombinant SRIF receptors. Octreotide and BIM-23027 are agonists with some selectivity for the sst2 receptor, but each has additional agonist activity at sst5 receptors, whereas Cyanamid154806 (Cyn) and BIM-23056 are antagonists for sst2 and sst5 receptors, respectively (2, 42). In this respect, BIM-23027 has been shown to inhibit neurogenically mediated contraction in the guinea pig ileum (15), whereas octreotide modulates gastrointestinal motility in both animals and human tissue (29, 40). The aims of this study were therefore to characterize the spontaneous peristaltic activity observed in isolated preparations of rat and mouse small intestine and to examine its modulation by SRIF and selective sst-receptor ligands. The availability of an sst2-receptor knockout mouse provided an opportunity to further characterise the role of sst2 receptors and also to compare the effects of SRIF in rat and mouse tissues.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiments were performed on in vitro segments of jejunum from
Sheffield-strain female hooded Lister rats (250-350 g) and 10- to
12-wk-old male C57BL/6 mice (25-37 g). The
sst2-receptor knockout mice
(Sstr2
/
) were generated at the
Babraham Institute (Cambridge, UK) by gene targeting (1).
Briefly, the Sstr2 coding sequence was replaced
by homologous recombination in HM-1 embryonic stem cells (129/OlaHsd)
with a cassette comprising a neomycin selectable marker and a
lacZ reporter gene. Chimeras were produced by blastocyst injection and then mated to C57BL/6 to achieve germline transmission. No sst2-receptor expression was detectable in
Sstr2
/
by RT-PCR. The mutation
was back-crossed onto C57BL/6 for three generations. Heterozygous
intercrossing was then employed to generate the wild-type and
sst2-receptor knockout animals examined in the current study.
Animals were stunned by a blow to the head and killed by cervical dislocation. A midline laparotomy was performed, and a segment of proximal jejunum was rapidly excised beginning 2-3 cm from the ligament of Treitz. The excised segment was placed in gassed (95% O2 and 5% CO2) Krebs bicarbonate buffer solution (composition in mM: 117 NaC1, 4.7 KC1, 25 NaHCO3, 2.5 CaC12, 1.2 MgCl2, 2 NaH2PO4, 1.2 H2O, and 11 D-glucose), cleared of any mesenteric connective tissue, and the lumen was flushed with Krebs solution. Two jejunal segments ~5 cm in length were prepared from each animal, and four in total were mounted horizontally in separate 20-ml perfusion chambers. The oral and aboral ends of each segment were secured to two metal catheters fixed at either end of the chamber and adjusted to maintain the segments at their resting length. For each segment, the oral end was connected to a perfusion pump for intrajejunal infusion of Krebs solution at a rate of 0.16 ml/min, and the aboral end was attached to a pressure transducer (Elcomatic EM 760, Elcomatic Ltd, Glasgow, UK) to record contractile activity as changes in intraluminal pressure under isovolumetric conditions. Tissues were maintained at 37°C, perfused with Krebs solution at a rate of 5 ml/min, and allowed to equilibrate for at least 30 min before experiments started. In some intestinal segments, spontaneous contractile activity developed during this equilibration period, but in others it did not. However, in preliminary experiments, it was found that activity developed more readily when the segment was distended. We, therefore, standardized the experimental setup by routinely infusing Krebs buffer into the closed segment to an initial intraluminal pressure of 10-11 cmH2O in the rat and 2.5-3.5 cmH2O in the mouse. Regular aborally propagating waves of contraction [migrating motor complexes (MMCs)] developed under these conditions and could be maintained for several hours. The output from the pressure transducers was relayed to a data-acquisition system (CED 1401+, Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK) and from there to a computer running Spike 2 software (CED), which displayed the four-channel pressure recordings online and also stored the data for subsequent offline analysis.
Experimental protocol. Only preparations in which regular migrating motor complexes were maintained were used for subsequent experiments. Drugs or the appropriate vehicle was added to the chambers 20 min after stopping perfusion and recording continued for a further 10 min before washing out the drugs and reinstating perfusion.
SRIF or the sst2-receptor agonists octreotide and BIM-23027 were added to the baths to produce final concentrations between 0.l and 1,000 nM. In experiments to study concentration-response relationships, only one concentration of a single agonist was used in each tissue segment to avoid complications produced by response desensitization. The sst2-receptor antagonist Cyn was added 3 min before exposure to the test agonist. Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and its enantiomer nitro-D-arginine methyl ester (D-NAME) were added 15 min before the test agonist.Spatiotemporal maps. To determine the nature of the contractile activity generated by these isolated jejunal segments, we used an imaging analysis system as described previously (25). Briefly, a digital video camera (Sony, DCR-PC100E) was mounted above the preparation, and brief sequences of contractile activity were recorded for subsequent analysis and construction of spatiotemporal maps as described in detail elsewhere (25). Movement of the intestinal wall are mapped as changes in diameter along the entire length of the segment and plotted over time. The widest diameter is coded black, and the narrowest is coded white, enabling contractions to appear as dynamic changes in shading in the spatiotemporal maps.
Data analysis.
MMCs were quantified in terms of their peak amplitude above baseline
(cmH2O), duration (s), and interval between them (s; Fig.
1). Baseline values were taken during the
10 min before drug application and the response effect in the 10 min
following application. In preliminary studies, it was established that
SRIF-receptor ligands influenced the interval between contraction
complexes without significantly affecting the contraction amplitude.
This effect was quantified by calculating the maximum interval between MMCs in the 10-min period before and after agonist administration. If
contractions were abolished, then an interval of 600 s was recorded and used in subsequent statistical analysis. Responses are
expressed as absolute values ± SE, with n being the
number of animals. Paired data were compared using Student's
t-test or Wilcoxon's rank sum test as appropriate. Grouped
data from wild-type and sst2-receptor knockout animals were
compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. In all cases, a probability of
P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
|
Drugs.
SRIF, L-NAME, D-NAME, atropine sulphate,
nifedipine,
-conotoxin GVIA, and TTX were purchased from Sigma
Chemical. Octreotide acetate "Sandostatin" [D-Phe-c
(Cys-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys) Thr-ol] was obtained from a
pharmaceutical supplier. BIM-23027
[c(N-Me-Ala-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Abu-Phel)], Cyn
[AcNH-4-NO2-Phe-c(D-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys)-Tyr-NH2],
and BIM-23056
[(D-Phe-Phe-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Val-Phe-D-Nal-NH2)]
were custom synthesized by Neosystem Laboratoire (Strasbourg).
All the peptides were dissolved in distilled water with the exception
of SRIF, which was dissolved in 1% bovine serum albumen in distilled
water, and BIM-23056, which was initially dissolve in 10%
dimethylsulfoxide. Atropine sulfate and
-conotoxin were dissolved in
saline (0.9% NaCl). All drugs were stored at
20°C. Freshly diluted
aliquots were maintained on ice during the course of the experiments
and added to the bath in microlitre volumes.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Migrating motor complexes. Luminal distension of isolated segments of rat and mouse jejunum evoked a regular pattern of contractile activity. The activity consisted of periodic increases in intraluminal pressure separated by periods of relative quiescent (Fig. 1). Spatiotemporal maps of both mouse and rat jejunal contractile activity revealed a similar pattern of activity. The increase in intraluminal pressure coincided with waves of contraction, seen as parallel lines on the maps that originated at the oral end of the segment and propagated aborally (Fig. 1). These contractions occurred at ~2-s intervals and traveled at about 5 mm/s. The contraction region itself migrated more slowly (~1 cm/min) and coincided with the maintained rise in intraluminal pressure. The pressure returned to baseline as the burst of peristaltic activity came to an end.
MMCs in the rat jejunum.
Baseline activity in a sample of 16 control tissues consisted of
periodic increases in intraluminal pressure of 31 ± 2.1-s duration and 10.5 ± 0.7-cmH2O amplitude separated by
periods of relative inactivity. The mean interval between such MMCs was
104.4 ± 9.6 s. MMCs were completely abolished (Fig.
2) by TTX (0.6 µM, n = 3),
conotoxin (0.1 µM, n = 5), atropine (1 µM,
n = 3), and nifedipine (1 µM, n = 7).
In contrast, the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor
L-NAME (100 µM) produced an increase in both MMC frequency and amplitude (Fig. 5A), such that maximum
intervals decreased from 194.4 ± 27 to 75.1 ± 7 s and
amplitude increased from 12.2 ± 1.5 to 17.8 ± 1.7 cmH2O (n = 9, P < 0. 01).
The inactive isomer D-NAME was without effect (100 µM,
n = 4, data not shown).
|
SRIF inhibits contractions via activation of sst2
receptors in rat jejunum.
SRIF (1-1,000 nM, n = 8-12) produced a
concentration-dependent reduction in the frequency of MMCs by
increasing the interval between them (Fig.
3, A and B). This
inhibition appeared as a period of contractile quiescence followed by a
return of activity at the rate observed before the addition of drug
rather than a long-term reduction in contraction frequency. Octreotide
and BIM-23027 mimicked the effect of SRIF, producing an increase in the
interval between MMCs. When tested at a concentration of 10 nM, the
increase in interval produced by both BIM-23027 (n = 8, P < 0.01) and octreotide (n = 4, P < 0.05) was greater than that produced by SRIF at
the same concentration (Fig.
4A), suggestive of an action
at sst2 receptors. In the presence of the selective
sst2-receptor antagonist Cyn (1 µM, n = 7), which had no effect on MMCs itself, the inhibitory action of SRIF
(300 nM) was abolished (Fig. 4B). Indeed, after Cyn, there
was a trend (P = 0.1) toward a decreased interval
between MMCs following SRIF.
|
|
Inhibition of contractions in rat jejunum by
sst2-receptor activation involves an NOS pathway.
As described above, 100 µM L-NAME produced a decrease in
the MMC interval, an effect that developed within 1 min of its
application and that was sustained in its continued presence for up to
25 min. SRIF (300 nM, n = 6) had no effect on MMCs in
the presence of L-NAME (Fig.
5B).
|
MMC in the mouse jejunum. Contractile activity in isolated mouse jejunum followed a similar pattern to that observed in the rat, although lower intraluminal pressures were required for their initiation (2.5-3.5 cmH20). Contractions in mouse tissue (based on a sample of 16) had a mean duration of 71.5 ± 4 s and an amplitude of 1.6 ± 0.1 cmH2O and were separated by a mean interval of 131.2 ± 8 s.
Inhibition of contractions by SRIF in mouse tissue involves more
than one receptor subtype.
As observed in the rat, SRIF produced a concentration-dependent
increase in the MMC interval (0.01-100 nM, n = 4;
Fig. 6). Although we were unable to
determine maximum effective concentrations, and thus EC50 values, in
either mouse or rat tissue (due to the 600-s ceiling imposed by
experimental protocol) the effect of SRIF in mouse tissue appeared to
be more potent than that in rat, because equivalent concentrations
produced a greater increase in interval in the former tissue. Indeed,
with 100 nM SRIF, there was a complete absence of contractile activity
in the majority of mouse jejunal segments. In contrast to observations
in rat tissue, in which the selective agonists produced a greater
effect than SRIF at the equivalent concentration, a higher
concentration of BIM-23027 was required to inhibit MMCs in mouse tissue
(Fig. 7). Furthermore, although the
inhibitory action of BIM-23027 (30 nM, n = 7) in mouse
tissue was abolished by prior administration of Cyn (1 µM), the
antagonist only partially prevented the inhibition of MMCs produced by
the nonselective agonist SRIF (10 nM, n = 5; Fig. 7).
The sst5-receptor antagonist BIM-23056 did not prevent the
inhibition of contractions by SRIF (10 nM, n = 4; data
not shown).
|
|
Studies in sst2-receptor knockout mice.
A comparison of the actions of SRIF and BIM-23027 on MMCs was made in
tissue taken from mice lacking the sst2 receptor
(Sstr2
/
) and their wild type
littermates. There was no difference in the parameters of the
contractile activity between the tissues taken from
sst2-receptor knockout and wild-type animals
(P > 0.05 n = 5; Fig.
8). MMCs in knockout mouse tissue
(n = 5) had a mean duration of 72.3 ± 11 s,
mean amplitude of 2.2 ± 0.5 cmH2O, and were separated
by a mean interval of 83.5 ± 18 s. Those in wild-type tissue
had a mean duration of 85.8 ± 18 s, mean amplitude of
1.8 ± 0.8 cmH2O, and were separated by a mean
interval of 113.8 ± 24 s. Due to restricted tissue supply,
single doses of SRIF (10 nM) and BIM-23027 (30 nM) were chosen that
would be expected to produce an inhibitory effect based on the data
above. In wild-type jejunum, both agonists SRIF (10 nM) and BIM-23027
(30 nM) produced a significant increase in the MMC interval (139.2 ± 30 vs. 526 ± 58 s, n = 5, P < 0.01 and 116 ± 24 vs. 256.2 ± 62 s, n = 5, P < 0.05, respectively), although the response to
BIM-23027 was significantly less than that to SRIF (P < 0.05). In contrast, BIM-23027 was without effect in the knockout
mouse jejunum, whereas SRIF produced a significant increase in the MMC
interval, the magnitude of which was significantly less than that in
the wild-type animal (526 ± 58 compared with 320 ± 84 s,
P < 0.05, n = 5; Fig. 9).
|
|
Inhibition of contractions in mouse jejunum by SRIF-receptor
activation does not involve an NOS pathway.
L-NAME (100 µM) decreased the interval between MMCs from
136.6 ± 25 to 103.1 ± 13 s (n = 8, P < 0.05) and increased the mean amplitude from
2.6 ± 0.5 to 3.6 ± 0.6 cmH2O (n = 8, P < 0.05). The effect of SRIF (10 nM,
n = 4) and BIM-23027 (30 nM, n = 4) on
the MMC interval was not influenced by prior treatment with L-NAME, both agonists still producing a significant
increase in the MMC interval (Fig. 10,
A and B).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ability of SRIF to inhibit intestinal peristalsis peripherally is well documented. However, the site of action of SRIF and the receptor subtype(s) responsible have not been fully characterized. In this study, we have demonstrated that SRIF caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of peristaltic activity evoked by luminal distension in isolated segments of rat and mouse jejunum, with a major role for sst2 receptors in this effect. However, whereas in rat jejunum, SRIF mediated its inhibitory action via NOS-dependent pathways, this was not the case in mouse jejunum. Moreover, experiments with receptor-selective ligands and in the sst2 knockout mouse revealed a non-sst2 receptor-mediated inhibition of intestinal peristalsis in mouse tissue that was not apparent in the rat.
Mechanisms underlying the inhibitory effect of SRIF in the rat and mouse. Somatostatin is widely distributed in the gastrointestinal tract and can be visualized immunocytochemically in mucosal D cells, in some subpopulations of sympathetic nerve terminals, and in the cell bodies and nerve fibers of submucosal and myenteric neurones (10, 13, 31, 38). Colocalization and fiber tracing studies have shown that somatostatin is present in interneurones that form descending chains of neurones that connect to muscle motor neurones (10, 31, 35). This topography is consistent with transmitter release studies by Grider and co-workers (20-23) implicating somatostatin in a complex interaction with GABAergic and enkephalinergic neuronal mechanisms that ultimately regulate NO and VIP release during descending relaxation in the rat colon. A similar neuronal interaction is suggested to regulate tachykinin release from longitudinal muscle motoneurones (22). Thus somatostatin is likely to act within the enteric circuits controling peristalsis rather than at the level of the neuromuscular junction, and this would explain the ability of SRIF to attenuate neurogenically mediated contraction of the guinea pig ileum (14, 18, 24, 36, 45).
The pattern of contractile activity observed in the isolated segments of rat and mouse jejunum was similar to the migrating motor complexes described by others (5, 7, 26) in the mouse ileum and colon. The MMCs described here consist of regularly recurring aborally propagating waves of activity separated by longer periods of quiescence and, similar to observations made by Bush and colleagues (7), were dependent on cholinergic mechanisms because they were blocked by hexamethonium and atropine. Bercik et al. (5) described a similar pattern in the rat ileum that was tetrodotoxin sensitive and superimposed on myogenic activity, which was the main focus of their investigations. This myogenic activity, similar to that describe earlier by Benard et al. (4), occurred at a frequency similar to the waves of contraction observed during the MMCs described in the present study. Clearly neural mechanisms are necessary to organize the pattern of activity into the MMCs that can be observed both in vitro and in vivo. SRIF inhibited MMCs by increasing the interval between them rather than by attenuating the magnitude or duration of the individual contractile events. Thus it is unlikely that SRIF is acting in our model at the level of the neuromuscular junction or on the muscle itself. However, effects of SRIF have been observed on isolated gastric and colonic smooth muscle, which were shown to be mediated predominantly via sst1 and sst3 receptors (8). SRIF sst2 receptors have also been localized immunocytochemically on interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) in the deep muscular plexus (39), which are believed to play role in nitrergic transmission (37, 41). An action of SRIF at either smooth muscle or ICC sites would be expected to attenuate the magnitude of MMCs. The fact that such an attenuation was not observed is more consistent with Grider's hypothesis (21, 22) that somatostatin leads to activation of mechanisms that augment descending relaxation. However, how this is brought about is not clear. The colocalization of somatostatin with acetylcholine in descending interneurones in the guinea pig (35) would imply a neuromodulatory role. In this respect, somatostatin acts presynaptically to inhibit acetylcholine release (24, 45) and postsynaptically to increase K+-channel activity, so reducing neuronal excitability (34). All five sst receptors appear to be preferentially coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins of the Gi/Go type (28). However, the effect of somatostatin on enteric neuronal K+ conductance appears not to depend on inhibition of adenylate cyclase but may involve a GTP binding protein (34). In Grider's model (21) for the way somatostatin augments descending relaxation, he proposes that inhibitory motoneurones receive an inhibitory input that itself is inhibited by somatostatin. The mechanism leading to descending relaxation in a variety of species, including the rat, involves the release of NO (9, 12, 19, 26). That SRIF was acting via this pathway was confirmed by the observation in the present study that inhibition of NO production with the L-arginine analog L-NAME completely prevented the inhibitory effect of SRIF in the rat jejunum. Interestingly, this was not the case in the mouse jejunum, in which L-NAME had no effect on the SRIF-mediated inhibition of MMC generation. This is despite the wealth of evidence implicating NO in descending inhibition in the mouse intestine (7, 12, 37) and the observed augmentation of peristaltic activity brought about by treatment with L-NAME. Thus there appears to be a fundamental difference between the mechanism of SRIF inhibition in the mouse and rat jejunum.Receptor characterization in the rat jejunum. SRIF mediates its actions through a family of G protein-coupled receptors that have been recently cloned (28). All five receptors (sst 1-5) have been shown to be expressed in the gastrointestinal tract (32, 44), with high levels of sst2 receptor in the rat jejunum. Our attempts to pharmacologically characterize the receptor(s) involved in the inhibition of jejunal peristalsis centered on the use of ligands that have selectivity for the sst2 receptor. Both octreotide and BIM-23027 are agonists that show selectivity for sst2 receptors but also have some affinity for the sst5-receptor subtype, and both mimicked the effect of SRIF in inhibiting contraction complex generation. Although EC50 values could not be calculated, lower concentrations of octreotide and BIM-23027 than of SRIF were necessary to inhibit MMCs, consistent with an action at sst2 receptors. BIM-23027 was about three times more potent than SRIF at inhibiting neurogenic contractions of the guinea pig ileum (15), and a similar potency order was observed for sst2-mediated inhibition of rat parietal cell secretion (43) and rat colon contractions (33).
Cyn is a potent and selective sst2-receptor antagonist at human, rat, as well as guinea pig receptors (2, 16, 17). This ligand prevented the inhibitory action of SRIF on rat jejunal MMC generation, confirming a major role for sst2 receptors, but had no effect in its own right on baseline contractile activity. Our data, therefore, strongly implicate the sst2-receptor subtype in the observed action of SRIF in the rat jejunum; however, as discussed below, there may be additional receptor mechanisms that are functional in the mouse jejunum.Receptor characterization in the mouse jejunum. Although SRIF exerted an inhibitory effect on MMC generation in the mouse jejunum, there were some notable differences from the observations in the rat. Firstly, whereas octreotide and BIM-23027 were more effective at lower concentrations than SRIF in the rat, the reverse was true in the mouse jejunum, in which SRIF was the most effective of the agonists. One explanation for this is that the different sst receptors are expressed in the rat and mouse. In this report, although Cyn abolished the response to BIM-23027 in the mouse jejunum, it only attenuated the response to SRIF. Thus, in the mouse, there is an additional non-sst2 receptor that is functionally linked to inhibition of intestinal peristalsis. The lack of effect of BIM-23056, which has been shown to have antagonist activity at human sst5 receptors, on either MMC intervals themselves or on the response to SRIF, would argue against the involvement of this receptor subtype.
Another difference between rat and mouse relates to the role of NO in the inhibitory response to SRIF. In the rat, the sst2-mediated response to SRIF is absent in tissue treated with L-NAME, which blocks NO synthesis. In contrast, in the mouse, the effect of both SRIF and BIM-23027 is unaffected by NOS inhibition. This suggests that different mechanisms may contribute to the inhibition of peristalsis in the mouse. Moreover, Cyn, although reversing the effect of BIM-23027 in the mouse jejunum, does not completely block the response to SRIF. It would appear that SRIF receptors other than the sst2 receptor are functional in the mouse jejunum, but neither sst2 receptor nor the non-sst2 receptor-mediated inhibition is dependent on nitrergic mechanisms.Responses in the sst2 knockout mouse. MMCs were not different in the sst2 receptor knockout mouse compared with its wild-type littermate. Similarly, the sst2 antagonist had no effect on baseline MMC activity in the rat jejunum. Thus, although exogenous SRIF can exert a profound inhibitory effect via sst2 receptors, there is little evidence that endogenous SRIF is involved in the regulation of MMC generation under the current experimental circumstances. This may reflect redundancy in the sst-receptor mechanisms that influence intestinal contractile activity. Indeed, the observation that SRIF but not BIM-23027 was able to evoke an inhibitory effect on MMC generation (despite the absence of functional sst2 receptors) confirms that an additional receptor subtype is involved in the regulation of intestinal peristalsis in the mouse.
In summary, from a pharmacological perspective, somatostatin is a potent inhibitor of intestinal peristaltic activity, but because it modulates the interval between contractions without any attenuation of the magnitude of the pressure rise, it would appear that the site of action is neither at the level of the muscle nor neuromuscular transmission. Instead, it seems that the interneuronal enteric circuitry that organizes the timing of motor activity is the site of action. Although this is true for both mouse and rat, only for the latter is the inhibition expressed through nitrergic pathways. sst2 Receptors mediate this inhibitory action of SRIF in both species, but our pharmacological data and the observations of maintained responses to SRIF in the sst2 knockout mouse would indicate that in this species, there is at least one other mechanism involved. Thus from a physiological perspective, the role of endogenous somatostatin in intestinal peristalsis remains enigmatic.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by King Abdull-Aziz University, Saudi Arabia.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Grundy, Dept. of Biomedical Science, Alfred Denny Bldg., Univ. of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpgi.00354.2001
Received 9 August 2001; accepted in final form 25 November 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Allen, JP,
Hathway GJ,
Emson PC,
Kendrick KM,
and
Humphery PP.
Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) knock-out/lacZ knock-in mice are refractory to somatostatin induced striatal dopamine release (Abstract).
Eur J Neurosci
12, Suppl11:
A49,
2000.
2.
Bass, RT,
Buckwalter BL,
Patel BP,
Pausch MH,
Price LA,
Strnad J,
and
Hadcock JR.
Identification and characterization of novel somatostatin antagonists.
Mol Pharmacol
50:
709-715,
1996[Abstract].
3.
Bayliss, WM,
and
Starling EH.
The movements and innervation of the small intestine.
J Physiol (Lond)
24:
99-143,
1899.
4.
Benard, T,
Bouchoucha M,
Dupres M,
and
Cugnenc PH.
In vitro analysis of rat intestinal wall movements at rest and during propagated contraction: a new method.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
273:
G776-G784,
1997
5.
Bercik, P,
Bouley L,
Dutoit P,
Blum AL,
and
Kucera P.
Quantitative analysis of intestinal motor patterns: spatiotemporal organization of nonneural pacemaker sites in the rat ileum.
Gastroenterology
119:
386-394,
2000[ISI][Medline].
6.
Brookes, SJ,
Chen BN,
Costa M,
and
Humphrey CM.
Initiation of peristalsis by circumferential stretch of flat sheets of guinea-pig ileum.
J Physiol (Lond)
516:
525-538,
1999
7.
Bush, TG,
Spencer NJ,
Watters N,
Sanders KM,
and
Smith TK.
Spontaneous migrating motor complexes occurs in both the terminal ileum and colon of the C57BL/6 mouse in vitro.
Auton Neurosci
84:
162-168,
2000[ISI][Medline].
8.
Corleto, VD,
Severi C,
Coy DH,
Delle FG,
and
Jensen RT.
Colonic smooth muscle cells possess a different subtype of somatostatin receptor from gastric smooth muscle cells.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
272:
G689-G697,
1997
9.
Costa, M,
Furness JB,
Pompolo S,
Brookes SJ,
Bornstein JC,
Bredt DS,
and
Snyder SH.
Projections and chemical coding of neurons with immunoreactivity for nitric oxide synthase in the guinea-pig small intestine.
Neurosci Lett
148:
121-125,
1992[ISI][Medline].
10.
Costa, M,
Furness JB,
Smith IJ,
Davies B,
and
Oliver J.
An immunohistochemical study of the projections of somatostatin-containing neurons in the guinea-pig intestine.
Neuroscience
5:
841-852,
1980[ISI][Medline].
11.
Donnerer, J,
Holzer P,
and
Lembeck F.
Release of dynorphin, somatostatin and substance P from the vascularly perfused small intestine of the guinea-pig during peristalsis.
Br J Pharmacol
83:
919-925,
1984[ISI][Medline].
12.
Ekblad, E,
Alm P,
and
Sundler F.
Distribution, origin and projections of nitric oxide synthase-containing neurons in gut and pancreas.
Neuroscience
63:
233-248,
1994[ISI][Medline].
13.
Ekblad, E,
Winther C,
Ekman R,
Hakanson R,
and
Sundler F.
Projections of peptide-containing neurons in rat small intestine.
Neuroscience
20:
169-188,
1987[ISI][Medline].
14.
Feniuk, W,
Dimech J,
and
Humphrey PP.
Characterization of somatostatin receptors in guinea-pig isolated ileum, vas deferens and right atrium.
Br J Pharmacol
110:
1156-1164,
1993[ISI][Medline].
15.
Feniuk, W,
Dimech J,
Jarvie EM,
and
Humphrey PP.
Further evidence from functional studies for somatostatin receptor heterogeneity in guinea-pig isolated ileum, vas deferens and right atrium.
Br J Pharmacol
115:
975-980,
1995[ISI][Medline].
16.
Feniuk, W,
Jarvie E,
Luo J,
Humphrey JA,
and
Humphrey PP.
Functional studies with the novel somatostatin (SRIF) sst2 receptor blocking drug Ac NH-4NO2-Phe-c[D-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys]-Tyr-NH2 (CYANAMID 154806) (Abstract).
Br J Pharmacol
123:
A111,
1998.
17.
Feniuk, W,
Jarvie E,
Luo J,
and
Humphrey PP.
Selective somatostatin sst(2) receptor blockade with the novel cyclic octapeptide, CYN-154806.
Neuropharmacology
39:
1443-1450,
2000[ISI][Medline].
18.
Furness, JB,
and
Costa M.
Actions of somatostatin on excitatory and inhibitory nerves in the intestine.
Eur J Pharmacol
56:
69-74,
1979[ISI][Medline].
19.
Furness, JB,
Li ZS,
Young HM,
and
Forstermann U.
Nitric oxide synthase in the enteric nervous system of the guinea-pig: a quantitative description.
Cell Tissue Res
277:
139-149,
1994[ISI][Medline].
20.
Grider, JR.
Somatostatin release from isolated ganglia of the myenteric plexus.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
257:
G313-G315,
1989
21.
Grider, JR.
Interplay of somatostatin, opioid, and GABA neurons in the regulation of the peristaltic reflex.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
267:
G696-G701,
1994
22.
Grider, JR.
Regulation of excitatory neural input to longitudinal intestinal muscle by myenteric interneurons.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
275:
G973-G978,
1998
23.
Grider, JR,
Arimura A,
and
Makhlouf GM.
Role of somatostatin neurons in intestinal peristalsis: facilitatory interneurons in descending pathways.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
253:
G434-G438,
1987
24.
Guillemin, R.
Somatostatin inhibits the release of acetylcholine induced electrically in the myenteric plexus.
Endocrinology
99:
1653-1654,
1976[Abstract].
25.
Hennig, GW,
Costa M,
Chen BN,
and
Brookes SJ.
Quantitative analysis of peristalsis in the guinea-pig small intestine using spatio-temporal maps.
J Physiol (Lond)
517:
575-590,
1999
26.
Holzer, P,
Lippe IT,
Tabrizi AL,
Lenard LJ,
and
Bartho L.
Dual excitatory and inhibitory effect of nitric oxide on peristalsis in the guinea pig intestine.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
280:
154-161,
1997
27.
Huizinga, JD,
Ambrous K,
and
Der-Silaphet T.
Co-operation between neural and myogenic mechanisms in the control of distension-induced peristalsis in the mouse small intestine.
J Physiol (Lond)
506:
843-856,
1998
28.
Humphrey, PPA,
Epelbaum J,
Feniuk W,
Hoyer D,
Taylor JE,
and
Reisine TR.
Somatostatin Receptors. The IUPHAR Compendium of Receptor Characterization and Classification, 1998, p. 246-255.
29.
John, KD,
Ballantyne GH,
and
Modlin IM.
Octreotide acetate inhibits motility in the rabbit distal colon.
Eur Surg Res
29:
311-318,
1997[ISI][Medline].
30.
Katayama, Y,
and
North RA.
The action of somatostatin on neurones of the myenteric plexus of the guinea-pig ileum.
J Physiol (Lond)
303:
315-323,
1980
31.
Keast, JR,
Furness JB,
and
Costa M.
Somatostatin in human enteric nerves. Distribution and characterization.
Cell Tissue Res
237:
299-308,
1984[ISI][Medline].
32.
Krempels, K,
Hunyady B,
O'Carroll AM,
and
Mezey E.
Distribution of somatostatin receptor messenger RNAs in the rat gastrointestinal tract.
Gastroenterology
112:
1948-1960,
1997[ISI][Medline].
33.
McKeen, ES,
Feniuk W,
and
Humphrey PP.
Mediation by SRIF1 receptors of the contractile action of somatostatin in rat isolated distal colon, studies using some novel SRIF analogues.
Br J Pharmacol
113:
628-634,
1994[ISI][Medline].
34.
Mihara, S,
North RA,
and
Surprenant A.
Somatostatin increases an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance in guinea-pig submucous plexus neurones.
J Physiol (Lond)
390:
335-355,
1987
35.
Pompolo, S,
and
Furness JB.
Quantitative analysis of inputs to somatostatin-immunoreactive descending interneurons in the myenteric plexus of the guinea-pig small intestine.
Cell Tissue Res
294:
219-226,
1998[ISI][Medline].
36.
Roberts, DJ,
Hasler WL,
and
Owyang C.
GABA mediation of the dual effects of somatostatin on guinea pig ileal myenteric cholinergic transmission.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
264:
G953-G960,
1993
37.
Sanders, KM.
A case for interstitial cells of Cajal as pacemakers and mediators of neurotransmission in the gastrointestinal tract.
Gastroenterology
111:
492-515,
1996[ISI][Medline].
38.
Sandstrom, O,
and
El-Salhy M.
Duodenal endocrine cells in mice with particular regard to age-induced changes.
Histol Histopathol
15:
347-353,
2000[ISI][Medline].
39.
Vannucchi, MG.
Receptors in interstitial cells of Cajal: identification and possible physiological roles.
Microsc Res Tech
47:
325-335,
1999[ISI][Medline].
40.
Von der Ohe, MR,
Camilleri M,
Thomforde GM,
and
Klee GG.
Differential regional effects of octreotide on human gastrointestinal motor function.
Gut
36:
743-748,
1995
41.
Ward, SM.
Interstitial cells of Cajal in enteric neurotransmission.
Gut
47, SupplIV:
IV40-IV43,
2000.
42.
Wilkinson, GF,
Thurlow RJ,
Sellers LA,
Coote JE,
Feniuk W,
and
Humphrey PP.
Potent antagonism by BIM-23056 at the human recombinant somatostatin sst5 receptor.
Br J Pharmacol
118:
445-447,
1996[ISI][Medline].
43.
Wyatt, MA,
Jarvie E,
Feniuk W,
and
Humphrey PP.
Somatostatin sst2 receptor-mediated inhibition of parietal cell function in rat isolated gastric mucosa.
Br J Pharmacol
119:
905-910,
1996[ISI][Medline].
44.
Yamada, Y,
Post SR,
Wang K,
Tager HS,
Bell GI,
and
Seino S.
Cloning and functional characterization of a family of human and mouse somatostatin receptors expressed in brain, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:
251-255,
1992
45.
Yau, WM,
Lingle PF,
and
Youther ML.
Modulation of cholinergic neurotransmitter release from myenteric plexus by somatostatin.
Peptides
4:
49-53,
1983[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Huizinga, C. M. McKay, E. J. White, W. J. E. P. Lammers, T. C. Seerden, J. G. De Man, B. Y. De Winter, and P. A. Pelckmans The Many Facets of Intestinal Peristalsis Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): G1347 - G1349. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Seerden, W. J. E. P. Lammers, B. Y. De Winter, J. G. De Man, and P. A. Pelckmans Spatiotemporal electrical and motility mapping of distension-induced propagating oscillations in the murine small intestine Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): G1043 - G1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Foxx-Orenstein, M Camilleri, D Stephens, and D Burton Effect of a somatostatin analogue on gastric motor and sensory functions in healthy humans Gut, November 1, 2003; 52(11): 1555 - 1561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |