Vol. 284, Issue 3, G357-G366, March 2003
THEME
Musings on the Wanderer: What's New in Our Understanding of Vago-Vagal Reflex?
IV. Current concepts of vagal efferent
projections to the gut
Howard Y.
Chang,
Hiroshi
Mashimo, and
Raj K.
Goyal
Center for Swallowing and Motility Disorders, VA Boston Healthcare
System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02132
 |
ABSTRACT |
Vagal efferents, consisting of
distinct lower motor and preganglionic parasympathetic fibers,
constitute the motor limb of vagally mediated reflexes. Arising from
the nucleus ambiguus, vagal lower motor neurons (LMN) mediate reflexes
involving striated muscles of the orad gut. LMNs provide cholinergic
innervation to motor end plates that are inhibited by myenteric
nitrergic neurons. Preganglionic neurons from the dorsal motor nucleus
implement parasympathetic motor and secretory functions. Cholinergic
preganglionic neurons form parallel inhibitory and excitatory vagal
pathways to smooth muscle viscera and stimulate postganglionic neurons via nicotinic and muscarinic receptors. In turn, the postganglionic inhibitory neurons release ATP, VIP, and NO, whereas the excitatory neurons release ACh and substance P. Vagal motor effects are dependent on the viscera's intrinsic motor activity and the interaction between
the inhibitory and excitatory vagal influences. These interactions help
to explain the physiology of esophageal peristalsis, gastric motility,
lower esophageal sphincter, and pyloric sphincter. Vagal secretory
pathways are predominantly excitatory and involve ACh and VIP as the
postganglionic excitatory neurotransmitters. Vagal effects on secretory
functions are exerted either directly or via release of local mediators
or circulating hormones.
enteric nervous system; gastrointestinal motility; gastrointestinal
secretions; gastrointestinal smooth muscle; neurotransmitters; parasympathetic nerves
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE VAGUS NERVE IS A MIXED sensory and
motor cranial nerve; it is comprised of an extensive network of
afferents fibers that transmit sensory information to the brainstem and
efferent fibers that form the motor limb of vago-vagal reflexes on
target organs. In recent years, there have been several
important advances in our understanding of the distribution and the
effects of vagal efferents on the gut. The purpose of this review is to
summarize our current understanding of the role of vagal efferents in
regulating motor and secretory functions of the gut that are mediated
by vago-vagal and other vagal reflexes.
 |
CENTRAL ORGANIZATION OF VAGAL MOTOR NEURONS |
Extensive work using labeling tracers such as horseradish
peroxidase and fluorescent carbocyanine dye have demonstrated that vagal efferent fibers innervating the gut originate from two brain stem
nuclei: the nucleus ambiguus (NA) (3) and the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMN) (1). Although some first-order
afferents may make monosynaptic contacts directly with the dendrites of DMN neurons, most of the first-order vagal afferents initially project
onto interneurons in selective subnuclei of the nucleus of the solitary
tract (NTS). Vagal motor neurons in the NA and the DMN receive
afferent inputs predominantly from NTS neurons, either as fiber
projections from the NTS neurons or by sending their own dendrites into
the NTS (3).
Within the DMN, the preganglionic neurons are organized into a series
of columns or subnuclei that relay central outflow to gastrointestinal
organs in a topographical manner (1). These columns of
cells align longitudinally over the entire nucleus. Each column of
cells corresponds to different organs within the gut and transmits
signals to those organs via the various branches of the vagus nerve.
Retrograde tracers injected into the five abdominal branches of the
vagus nerve can be localized topographically in distinct columns of
cells within the DMN (Table 1) (1). Although each branch
of the abdominal vagal nerve supplies different organs in the abdomen,
there is significant overlap in the territories covered. In addition to
this general organization, the preganglionic neurons are arranged so
that neurons triggering excitatory and inhibitory vagal responses are
located in different parts of the DMN. Neuroanatomical details of how
preganglionic neurons forming the excitatory and inhibitory vagal
pathways to different segments of the gut are arranged have become
available recently.
 |
VAGAL LOWER MOTOR NEURONS |
The rostral part of the NA, called the nucleus retrofacialis
or the compact formation, contains all the vagal lower motor neurons
(LMN) that control the motor function of striated muscles of the
pharynx and the esophagus. These LMNs mediate all of the pharyngeal and
laryngeal vagal reflexes (see Table 1). In some animal species such as
the mouse, rat, and dog, nearly the entire esophagus is composed of
striated muscle except the most distal part. In contrast, the cat,
ferret, and opossum have striated muscle only in the more proximal
esophagus. In humans, only the cervical esophagus is made up of the
striated muscle; the thoracic esophagus is composed of smooth muscle
fiber. Regardless of the extent, all striated muscle of the esophagus
receives input from LMNs located in the NA (3).
All vagal LMNs are cholinergic and excitatory in nature. The LMNs to
pharynx and esophagus contain acetylcholine transferase and CGRP. Their
axons are myelinated, and they make direct contact with striated muscle
fibers in the cervical esophagus via motor end plates. ACh released at
the motor end plate activates nicotinic cholinergic receptors on the
striated muscle to initiate muscle contraction. Basal closure of the
upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is generated by tonic excitation of
the vagal LMNs to the cricopharyngeus and inferior pharyngeal
constrictor muscles. UES opening with swallowing is due to central
inhibition of these neurons and stimulation of the vagal and nonvagal
neurons to the suprahyoid muscles.
Peristalsis in the striated muscle portion of the esophagus is
centrally generated and mediated by vagal LMNs. Peristalsis in this
region is abolished by vagotomy above the pharyngoesophageal branches.
Because electrical stimulation of the vagal LMN efferents can only
generate simultaneous contractions at all levels of the striated muscle
(10), central organization is necessary to produce peristaltic contractions. Highly organized discharges from premotor swallowing neurons in the central subnucleus of the NTS initiate a
sequential activation of vagal LMNs. This serial activation of the
neurons innervating progressively distal regions results in ordered
waves of striated muscle contractions in a craniocaudal direction that
constitute the peristaltic contraction (Fig.
1).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Mechanism of vagally evoked peristalsis in the striated
muscle of the esophagus. Peristalsis in the striated muscle portion of
the esophagus is centrally generated by the nucleus ambiguus and
mediated by vagal lower motor neurons. The nucleus ambiguus generates a
sequential activation of vagal lower motor neurons, which, in turn
produce successive contractions in the cervical esophagus in a
proximodistal direction. vs, Vagal stimulation.
|
|
In the striated muscle portion of the esophagus, the cholinergic vagal
LMNs are negatively regulated by the myenteric nitrergic neurons. The
striated muscle portion of the esophagus includes myenteric plexus with
neurons that contain nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS). These neurons do
not appear to be innervated by vagal preganglionic efferents but may
receive local sensory inputs. The nitrergic myenteric neurons may
provide peripheral inhibitory modulation of peristaltic contractions by
sending inhibitory projections to the motor end plates of the striated muscles.
 |
VAGAL PARASYMPATHETIC PREGANGLIONIC NEURONS |
The DMN contains all the preganglionic neurons that project onto
postganglionic neurons, which, in turn, innervate the smooth muscle,
exocrine glands, and endocrine cells of the upper and midgut (Table
1). The postganglionic neurons supplying
the distal colon, rectum, and the anal canal receive input from the
sacral cord. Preganglionic neurons in the DMN form the motor limb of vagal-mediated reflexes involving smooth muscle organs of the gut.
Their axons are usually unmyelinated and transmit impulses at C-fiber
conduction velocities. The axons terminate on the enteric plexus
neurons. It is important to emphasize that the enteric secretomotor
neurons that are postganglionic neurons in the vagal pathway also
receive concomitant inputs from enteric neurons, sympathetic nerves,
systemic hormones, and local mediators.
The number of postganglionic neurons involved in the vagal pathways is
only a small portion of the total number of enteric neurons in the gut.
It was initially proposed that all of the neurons in the myenteric and
submucosal ganglia of the gut were postganglionic neurons in the vagal
efferent pathways. However, because the number of enteric neurons is
significantly greater than the number of vagal efferent fibers, it
became clear that the preganglionic efferents cannot possibly provide
direct input to all of the enteric neurons. Moreover, functional and
morphological studies suggest that there are regional differences in
the density of vagal preganglionic innervation along the gut. Vagal
influence is more prominent in the esophagus and stomach but decreases
in the small bowel and colon. Anterograde tracers injected into the DMN
have been shown to label up to 100% of the myenteric ganglia in the
stomach, 96% in the duodenum, 40% in the jejunum, 66% in cecum, 16%
in the descending colon, and 0% in the rectum (Fig. 2) (2).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Decreasing density of the enteric neurons that are
innervated by the vagal preganglionic fibers. The figure shows the
percentage of vagally innervated myenteric ganglia in different
sections of the gastrointestinal tract. Vagal efferents demonstrate a
gradient of generally decreasing innervation at distal segments of the
gut. Vagal influence is maximal at the stomach and proximal duodenum
and decreases in the mid- and the distal gut. des, Descending.
|
|
Vagal efferents to gastrointestinal smooth muscles provide parallel
inhibitory and excitatory stimuli. For a long time in the past, it was
thought that the vagus nerve provides only excitatory influences to the
gut. One of the major advances in our understanding of how the vagus
nerve controls gastrointestinal motility is the realization that vagal
motor pathways are comprised of parallel inhibitory and excitatory
pathways (4, 16). The neurons that constitute the
inhibitory and excitatory pathway to each organ appear to be segregated
within the DMV (Fig. 3). These pathways have been best characterized for the lower esophageal sphincter (LES).
The preganglionic neurons of the excitatory motor pathway are localized
to the rostral DMN, whereas preganglionic neurons of the inhibitory
motor pathway are present in the caudal part of the DMN
(17). Information on the location of neurons forming the
inhibitory and excitatory vagal pathways to other parts of the gut is
currently incomplete. The smooth muscle of the gut also receives
segmental innervation that allows discrete vagal control over different
motor segments within the same organ, similar to that for the striated
muscles. Anatomic details of such segmental pathways are also not
currently known.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Parallel excitatory and inhibitory pathways. Vagal
preganglionic efferents to the gut form 2 pathways: 1)
excitatory pathway with cholinergic preganglionic neurons from the
rostral dorsal motor nucleus (DMN) and cholinergic postganglionic
neurons in the enteric ganglia; 2) inhibitory pathway with
cholinergic preganglionic neurons from the caudal DMN and nitrergic
postganglionic neurons in the enteric ganglia. Smooth muscle tone is
dependent on the balance between the 2 pathways. NO, nitric oxide; SP,
substance P.
|
|
The excitatory vagal pathway consists of preganglionic
cholinergic neurons and postganglionic cholinergic neurons containing cholineacetyltransferase and substance P. In contrast, the inhibitory motor pathway consists of preganglionic cholinergic neurons and postganglionic nonadrenergic, noncholinergic (NANC) neurons that contain NOS and VIP. These neurons exert inhibitory effects on smooth
muscle by releasing ATP, NO, and VIP. The synaptic transmission between
the preganglionic cholinergic neurons and the postganglionic neurons
involves nicotinic as well as muscarinic receptors.
The vagal influence on the motor activity of gastrointestinal viscera
is dependent on the organ's background motor activity and whether the
inhibitory, excitatory, or combination of both inhibitory and
excitatory vagal pathways is involved. The inhibitory and excitatory
vagal motor pathways act independently in some reflex activities,
whereas in others, they act in concert to produce a complex motor
response. For example, the smooth muscle sphincters of the gut remain
contracted in the basal state due to their intrinsic myogenic tone.
Activation of the inhibitory vagal pathways to the sphincters causes
relaxation, whereas stimulation of the excitatory pathways causes
contraction. A sequential activation of inhibitory and excitatory vagal
pathways produces a sequence of relaxation followed by contraction. The
vagal pathways also innervate and regulate the activity of the
intramural interstitial cells of Cajal, which are endocrine cells that
exert effects on gastrointestinal smooth muscle either by a direct
action or by releasing local mediator or circulating hormone.
 |
PERISTALSIS IN ESOPHAGEAL SMOOTH MUSCLE |
In the smooth muscle portion of the esophagus, swallowing elicits
reflex peristalsis that is generated centrally and mediated by
preganglionic vagal neurons from the DMN. Swallow-induced peristalsis is termed primary peristalsis to distinguish it from the so-called secondary peristalsis that is produced by local reflexes. Primary peristalsis is abolished by bilateral vagotomy. Vagal preganglionic efferents stimulate peristalsis by activating and modifying the intrinsic esophageal peristaltic reflex.
The intrinsic esophageal peristalsis is mediated by the NANC inhibitory
and cholinergic excitatory myenteric neurons acting in concert.
Although usually termed inhibitory, stimulation of the NANC nerves in
smooth muscle strips elicits a biphasic response that consists of
inhibition followed by a rebound contraction. In smooth muscles that
have no basal tone, inhibition is expressed only as a latency period
during the period of nerve stimulation. Contraction of smooth muscle
follows the end of a prolonged stimulus and is called the "rebound"
or "off" contraction. Weisbrodt and Christensen (24)
showed that the latencies of the rebound contraction in esophageal
circular muscle strips increase progressively in a craniocaudal
orientation and proposed that a latency gradient along the esophagus is
generated by NANC nerves. Recent studies demonstrate that NO is the
elusive NANC neurotransmitter responsible for the biphasic response.
NOS inhibitors suppress the latency and latency gradient of esophageal
contractions due to NANC nerve stimulation at different levels of the
esophagus (14).
Excitatory postganglionic neurons that are cholinergic in nature
are also present in the esophageal myenteric plexus (9). The cholinergic neurons demonstrate a gradient of influence that decreases distally along the esophagus (4). In most
experimental protocols, cholinergic and NANC nerves are stimulated
simultaneously. With simultaneous activation by a short-duration nerve
stimulus, the NANC inhibitory response appears first and is followed by a cholinergic contraction that may overlap the NANC rebound
contraction. When the nerve stimulus is prolonged, the cholinergic
contraction and the NANC rebound contractions become separated. The
cholinergic contraction occurs near the onset of the stimulus and is
called the "on" contraction; the NANC rebound contraction occurs at
the end of the stimulus and is called the off contraction.
Crist et al. (4) presented a model that incorporates the
gradients of increasing NANC and decreasing cholinergic influences along the esophagus. This model explains the peripheral mechanisms for
peristalsis-like behavior of esophageal circular muscle strips in
vitro, and esophageal peristalsis elicited by vagal efferent stimulation in vivo (Fig. 4).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Peripheral mechanism of peristalsis. Crist's model
(4) describes gradients of cholinergic and noncholinergic
nerve influence along the smooth muscle portion of the esophagus.
Cholinergic influence predominates at the proximal esophagus and
decreases distally. In contrast, noncholinergic influence is minimal
proximally and progressively increases at the distal esophagus. UES,
upper esophageal sphincter; LES, lower esophageal sphincter.
|
|
The swallowing reflex that evokes primary peristalsis is organized by
the swallowing center in the brain stem and is conveyed to the
esophageal smooth muscles by vagal preganglionic neurons. With the
onset of swallowing, preganglionic efferents that project onto the NANC
postganglionic neurons are activated first. These efferents cause a
prompt inhibition of the entire smooth muscle esophagus that occurs
within <1 s of the onset of swallowing. This phenomenon is termed
deglutitive inhibition. The degree and duration of the inhibition are
greater at the distal end of the esophagus due to the gradient of
increasing NANC influence. The inhibitory response is followed by a
rebound contraction with progressively increasing latencies along the
esophagus. Swallowing also initiates the sequential activation of a
second set of preganglionic efferent fibers with latency periods
ranging between 1 and 5 s (7). These fibers with
longer latencies are speculated to project onto cholinergic
postganglionic excitatory neurons in the esophagus. This sequential
activation of the cholinergic excitatory pathway is similar to the
serial activation of the lower motor neurons in the striated muscle of
the esophagus. During swallowing, the cholinergic excitation sequence
is timed to superimpose on the NANC rebound contraction. This augments
the amplitude and modulates the latency gradient of the primary
peristaltic contraction (Fig. 5).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Role of vagal efferent nerves in primary peristalsis.
Sequential activation of nonadrenergic, noncholinergic (NANC) and
cholinergic postganglionic neurons in the smooth muscle portion of the
esophagus accounts for deglutitive inhibition followed by peristalsis.
Short-latency fibers activate NANC postganglionic neurons to produce
smooth muscle inhibition initially. Long-latency fibers subsequently
stimulate cholinergic neurons to produce muscle contractions that are
timed to coincide with NANC rebound contractions. rDMN, rostral DMN;
cDMN, caudal DMN.
|
|
In humans, deglutitive inhibition preceding the primary peristalsis is
prominently revealed when repetitive successive swallows are taken at
close intervals, as seen when drinking fluids. Each successive swallow
inhibits the peristaltic contraction from the preceding swallow, and
only the last swallow is associated with peristaltic contraction.
 |
LES |
The LES is composed of tonic smooth muscle with intrinsic myogenic
properties that keep the sphincter closed during basal conditions.
Manometrically, the LES is revealed as a zone of high pressure that is
present at the lower end of the esophagus. Vagal preganglionic fibers
projecting to the LES arise from two distinct populations of cells in
the DMN, one rostral and one caudal to the obex. The preganglionic
neurons that form the inhibitory pathway are located in the caudal
regions of the DMN, whereas the neurons for the excitatory pathway are
concentrated in the rostral part of the DMN (17). The
synaptic neurotransmission between the preganglionic cholinergic and
the postganglionic nitrergic neurons involves nicotinic and
m1 muscarinic receptors. Furthermore, the neurotransmission
of the excitatory postganglionic neurons is cholinergic and peptidergic
(substance P), whereas the inhibitory postganglionic neurons are
nitrergic and peptidergic (VIP).
Both the inhibitory and the excitatory vagal pathways exert tonic
effects on the LES (Fig. 6). When the
inhibitory and excitatory influences are equal, bilateral vagotomy
(9) or the use of tetrodotoxin (8) does not
change the lower esophageal pressure. On the other hand, selective
antagonism of only one of the pathways leads to unopposed effects of
the other pathway. For example, suppression of a cholinergic excitatory
pathway by an anticholinergic agent or botulinum toxin decreases LES
pressure due to the unopposed action of the inhibitory nerves. In
contrast, suppression of a nitrergic inhibitory pathway with NOS
inhibitors results in a rise in the LES pressure due to the unopposed
action of the excitatory nerves.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of vagotomy and neural antagonists on the lower esophageal
sphincter pressure (LESP). LESP is dependent on the balance between
vagal excitatory and inhibitory pathways. Changes in the LESP can be
caused by defects in inhibitory, excitatory, or both inhibitory and
excitatory vagal pathways. Bilateral vagotomy and tetrodotoxin reveal
myogenic LESP, because both excitatory and inhibitory pathways are
disrupted equally. Botulinum toxin selectively inhibits the excitatory
pathway and reduces LESP. Conversely, NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors
selectively interrupt the inhibitory pathway and increase LESP. Atr,
atropine.
|
|
Selective activation of the vagal inhibitory pathway can generate the
reflex LES relaxation associated with deglutition. LES relaxation is an
integral part of swallow-evoked primary peristalsis, and both the LES
relaxation and primary peristalsis are abolished by bilateral vagotomy.
With the onset of swallowing, LES relaxes to intragastric pressure.
This relaxation lasts for ~8-10 s and is followed by an
aftercontraction in the rostral part of the LES that is continuous to
the peristaltic contraction in the esophageal body. This series of
events enables the swallowed bolus to pass through the high-pressure
LES with minimal resistance and restores the barrier to gastric
contents immediately afterwards. LES relaxation is the most sensitive
component of the primary peristaltic reflex, because the relaxation can
occur without associated pharyngeal or esophageal peristalsis. Minimal
pharyngeal stimulation can cause LES relaxation that may be clinically
important in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux in the
pharyngeally intubated patients.
Vagal inhibitory and excitatory pathways to the LES are selectively
activated in a number of motor reflexes involving the LES. Stimulation
of abdominal vagal afferents and distension of the proximal stomach
trigger the inhibitory pathway to produce LES relaxation. Vago-vagal
reflexes such as belching and the so-called transient LES relaxation
also rely on the inhibitory pathway to generate LES relaxation (Fig.
7). Conversely, activation of the vagal
excitatory pathway increases the LES pressure and myoelectric phasic
contractions, which have been recorded in the LES during phases II and
III of gastric migrating motor complexes.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Neural circuitry for transient LESR (tLESR). Afferent
signals from the subdiaphragmatic vagus nerves are relayed sequentially
to the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) and the DMN. LES relaxation
results from the selective activation of the vagal inhibitory pathway,
which increases NO release from postganglionic neurons.
|
|
Of note, vagotomy does not affect the LES relaxation produced by
distension of the smooth muscle portion of the esophagus, with or
without the associated secondary peristalsis that stems from the local
reflex pathway (9). This contrasts sharply with the
abolishing effect of vagotomy on LES relaxation elicited by distension
of the striated muscle part of the esophagus (12). This is
due to the fact that secondary peristalsis in striated muscle is
centrally mediated via the brain stem.
 |
PROXIMAL STOMACH |
Vagal efferents play an important role in modulating the
tonic contractions of smooth muscles in the proximal stomach. The vagal
inhibitory pathway is essential to the receptive relaxation reflex that
is designed to accommodate ingested food with minimal increases in the
gastric pressure. Bilateral cervical vagotomy completely abolishes the
receptive relaxation in cats and dogs. Electrical vagal stimulation
induces gastric fundic relaxation (21). However, selective
stimulation of vagal preganglionic fibers projecting onto
postganglionic cholinergic neurons can increase proximal stomach tone
and enhance gastric emptying of liquids.
Interestingly, esophageal distension may also cause gastric fundic
relaxation. It has been suggested that esophageal distension, via vagal
afferents and the central subnucleus of the NTS, stimulates the vagal
inhibitory pathway neurons in the caudal DMN and inhibits the
excitatory pathway neurons in the rostral part of the DMN (16). The summation of these two effects leads to proximal
stomach relaxation in response to esophageal distension.
The so-called adaptive relaxation reflex refers to the relaxation of
the proximal stomach in response to gastric antral distension. Adaptive
relaxation is responsible for creating a pressure gradient within the
stomach that promotes retropulsion of food to ensure that large food
particles are adequately triturated. The adaptive relaxation can be
generated by a local reflex as well as by vago-vagal pathways. Afferent
signals from mechanoreceptors in the antrum are relayed to the NTS and
DMN sequentially. Vagal preganglionic neurons innervate the NANC
inhibitory neurons in the myenteric plexus of the proximal stomach.
Bilateral vagotomy results in transient loss of adaptive relaxation
that is restored with time in rats (22).
 |
DISTAL STOMACH |
The distal stomach, including the distal two-thirds of the corpus
and the antrum, exhibits phasic contractions paced by slow waves and
migrating motor complexes (MMC). The main purpose of phasic
contractions in the distal stomach is to grind food into smaller
particles that can be emptied into the duodenum. Vagal excitatory
pathway augments these phasic contractions. In the rat, vagotomy delays
the antral contractions in response to feeding and reduces them 40 min
after feeding (11). Although gastric MMC is not initiated
by the vagus nerve, vagal efferents modulate its character
(23). Gastric MMC has been shown to be inhibited by vagal
denervation and stimulated by vagal stimulation. Vagal denervation
decreases the number of contractions and total motor activity of the
MMC (23). The vagal excitatory pathway acts to promote MMC
in the stomach.
 |
PYLORUS |
Both of the vagal excitatory and inhibitory pathways assist in
regulating the pyloric sphincter. The vagal excitatory pathway contributes toward the closure of pylorus sphincter during the initial
prandial phase when the antrum displays phasic contractions. Subsequently, in the late prandial phase, the vagal inhibitory pathway
generates pyloric relaxation and lowers the pyloric resistance to
promote flow of triturated food into the duodenum. During gastric emptying, vagal efferent nerves coordinate the motor sequence of antral
contraction followed by pyloric opening. Vagotomy impairs antropyloric
coordination and delays gastric emptying (11).
 |
GALLBLADDER AND SPHINCTER OF ODDI |
Vagal efferent nerves form a rich network of nerve fibers around
the gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi. Recent morphological studies
have shown that the gallbladder is innervated by inhibitory vagal
preganglionic neurons situated at the caudal DMN and by excitatory
vagal preganglionic neurons localized to the rostral DMN
(5). This arrangement of inhibitory and excitatory vagal pathways to the gallbladder is similar to that seen for the LES.
The effect of the vagus nerve on the motility of the gallbladder is
controversial. Numerous studies have shown that truncal vagotomy
results in impaired gallbladder emptying, whereas others reported no
effects. These conflicting results may be due to the variation in the
amount of vagal excitatory and inhibitory pathways that are affected
during those studies. In the presence of a prominent excitatory vagal
component, vagotomy inhibits the increase in spike potentials in the
sphincter of Oddi (20) and disrupts the interdigestive
motor activity of the gallbladder that is usually coordinated with
gastric MMC (25). Both of these mechanisms contribute
toward impaired gallbladder emptying. In contrast, it is possible that
in the presence of a prominent inhibitory vagal component, vagotomy
merely reflects the lack of excitatory vagal influence and results in
no effect on gallbladder motility. Further studies are needed to test
this possibility.
 |
SMALL INTESTINE |
The small intestine exhibits rhythmic phasic contractions, MMC,
and giant migrating contractions (GMC). The rhythmic phasic contractions of the small intestine produce slow, orderly propulsion of
luminal contents in an aboral direction. Stimulation of vagal stimulation in the neck causes a sequence of inhibition followed by
excitation of the phasic activity (Fig. 8) (6).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of vagal stimulation on small intestine electrical activity.
Vagal stimulation produces a sequence of electrical inhibition followed
by excitation that stems from stimulating vagal inhibitory and
excitatory pathways, respectively (Adapted from Ref. 6).
|
|
The role of vagal efferents in regulating the MMC of the small
intestine is not fully understood. It has been suggested that vagal
inhibitory activity is more active in the proximal small intestine,
which acts to slow the progression of MMC through the bowel. Vagal
efferent stimulation with sham feeding suppresses MMC and inhibits
propagation of MMC (15). This contrasts sharply with the
excitatory effect of vagal stimulation on gastric MMC.
GMC are motor patterns exhibiting large amplitudes and long durations
that normally occur only in the distal small bowel and colon. However, under certain
circumstances such as bowel infection, GMC may sweep
through the entire gut. Sha et al. (19) reported that
origination and retrograde migration of GMC associated with vomiting
induced by apomorphine in the small intestine are suppressed by vagotomy.
 |
ILEOCECAL SPHINCTER |
The ileocecal sphincter (ICS), a high-pressure zone
that serves as a barrier preventing reflux of colonic content into the ileum, has been shown to demonstrate both tonic and phasic
contractions. Vagal efferents regulate the motor activities of the ICS
in conjunction with splanchnic and intramural nerves. Electrical
stimulation of vagal efferent nerves induces a biphasic response in
which the ICS exhibits a rebound contraction after an initial
relaxation. By altering the frequency of vagal stimulation, both
sphincter relaxation and contraction can be elicited independently.
When chyme is propagated through the small intestine to the ICS, the vagal inhibitory pathway relaxes the sphincter to permit flow through
into the sphincter. The vagal excitatory pathway subsequently activates
tonic contraction to close the sphincter (13). Elevations in tonic pressure across the ICS are associated with phasic contractions.
 |
PROXIMAL COLON |
Phasic contractions, MMCs, and GMCs have been described in the
proximal colon. Cervical vagal cooling greatly reduces colonic motility, and vagal stimulation elicits large-amplitude colonic contractions (18).
 |
DISTAL COLON |
The distal colon does not receive vagal preganglionic innervation.
Instead, it is innervated and regulated by spinal preganglionic neurons
located in the sacral segments of the spinal cord.
 |
VAGAL REGULATION OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL SECRETIONS |
In contrast to the parallel-pathway model seen in the motor
regulation of smooth muscle viscera, vagal efferent pathways to secretory cells throughout the gut exhibit mostly excitatory effects. Unlike vagal innervation of the smooth muscles, direct
inhibitory innervation is not present. Both postganglionic cholinergic
and VIPergic neurons in the enteric ganglia provide excitatory stimuli for secretory cells. Some postganglionic neurons provide direct stimulation to the exocrine secretory cells, whereas other secretory effects are mediated by the release of intermediary factors or circulating hormones. Table 2 summarizes
the effects of vagal stimulation and vagotomy on the secretory activity
in the gastrointestinal tract.
 |
SUMMARY |
In conclusion, our understanding of how vagal efferent nerves
regulate motor and secretory functions of the gut has increased significantly in recent times. The most important discovery regarding vagal regulation of smooth muscles in the gut is the realization that
vagal preganglionic neurons form two separate excitatory and inhibitory
pathways by innervating different postganglionic neurons in the enteric
ganglia. This parallel innervation enables vagal efferent nerves to
induce changes in smooth muscle tone by selectively activating
excitatory, inhibitory, or both pathways. Both excitatory and
inhibitory pathways are necessary because different smooth muscle
organs in the gut have varying baseline muscle tone and different motor
complexes. In contrast, vagal pathways to secretory cells in the gut
predominantly produce excitatory responses. Only excitation of
secretory cells is needed, because they are quiescent during basal
conditions. More investigation is needed to delineate the locations of
inhibitory and excitatory neurons in the DMN, the mechanisms by which
the pathways are selectively activated, the anatomical connections to
the enteric nervous system, and the types of neurotransmitters released
by postganglionic neurons. Furthermore, more studies are needed to
understand the role of vagal efferent nerves in the regulation of
gastrointestinal motility.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
This work was supported in part by National Institute of Diabetes
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant DK-31092 and a Veterans Affairs
Merit Review Award from the Office of Research and Development, Medical
Research Service, Department of Veterans Health Administration.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. K. Goyal, VA Boston Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (E-mail: raj_goyal{at}hms.harvard.edu).
10.1152/ajpgi.00478.2002
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Berthoud, HR,
Carlson NR,
and
Powley TL.
Topography of efferent vagal innervation of the rat gastrointestinal tract.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
260:
R200-R207,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Berthoud, HR,
Jedrzejewska A,
and
Powley TL.
Simultaneous labeling of vagal innervation of the gut and afferent projections from the visceral forebrain with dil injected into the dorsal vagal complex in the rat.
J Comp Neurol
301:
65-79,
1990[ISI][Medline].
3.
Broussard, DL,
and
Altschuler SM.
Brainstem viscerotopic organization of afferents and efferents involved in the control of swallowing.
Am J Med
108, Suppl 4a:
79S-86S,
2000.
4.
Crist, J,
Gidda JS,
and
Goyal RK.
Characteristics of "on" and "off" contractions in esophageal circular muscle in vitro.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
246:
G137-G144,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5.
Furukawa, N,
and
Okada H.
Effects of stimulation of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus on the extrahepatic biliary system in dogs.
Jpn J Physiol
42:
945-955,
1992[Medline].
6.
Gidda, JS,
and
Goyal RK.
Influence of vagus nerves on electrical activity of opossum small intestine.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
239:
G406-G410,
1980[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Gidda, JS,
and
Goyal RK.
Swallow-evoked action potentials in vagal preganglionic efferents.
J Neurophysiol
52:
1169-1180,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8.
Goyal, RK,
and
Rattan S.
Genesis of basal sphincter pressure: effect of tetrodotoxin on lower esophageal sphincter pressure in opossum in vivo.
Gastroenterology
71:
62-67,
1976[ISI][Medline].
9.
Goyal, RK,
and
Sivarao DV.
Functional anatomy and physiology of swallowing and esophageal motility.
In: The Esophagus, edited by Castell DO,
and Richter JE.. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999, p. 1-31.
10.
Grundy, D.
Vagal control of gastrointestinal function.
Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol
2:
23-43,
1988[ISI][Medline].
11.
Ishiguchi, T,
Tada H,
Nakagawa K,
Yamamura T,
and
Takahashi T.
Hyperglycemia impairs antro-pyloric coordination and delays gastric emptying in conscious rats.
Auton Neurosci
95:
112-120,
2002[ISI][Medline].
12.
Lang, IM,
Medda BK,
and
Shaker R.
Mechanisms of reflexes induced by esophageal distension.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
281:
G1246-G1263,
2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.
Pahlin, PE,
and
Kewenter J.
The vagal control of the ileo-cecal sphincter in the cat.
Acta Physiol Scand
96:
433-442,
1976[ISI][Medline].
14.
Park, H,
and
Conklin JL.
Neuromuscular control of esophageal peristalsis.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep
1:
186-197,
1999[Medline].
15.
Pouderoux, P,
Veyrac M,
and
Michel H.
Sham feeding disrupts phase III of the duodenal migrating motor complex in humans.
Neurogastroenterol Motil
7:
139-144,
1995[Medline].
16.
Rogers, RC,
Hermann GE,
and
Travagli RA.
Brainstem pathways responsible for oesophageal control of gastric motility and tone in the rat.
J Physiol
514:
369-383,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Rossiter, CD,
Norman WP,
Jain M,
Hornby PJ,
Benjamin S,
and
Gillis RA.
Control of lower esophageal sphincter pressure by two sites in dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
259:
G899-G906,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Scratcherd, T,
Grundy D,
and
Collman PI.
Evidence for a non-cholinergic excitatory innervation in the control of colonic motility.
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther
280:
164-175,
1986[Medline].
19.
Sha, S,
Matsushima Y,
Habu S,
Mishima Y,
and
Okamoto E.
Extrinsic nervous control of retrograde giant contraction during vomiting in conscious dogs.
Dig Dis Sci
41:
1546-1550,
1996[ISI][Medline].
20.
Takahashi, I,
Dodds WJ,
Hogan WJ,
Itoh Z,
and
Baker K.
Effect of vagotomy on biliary-tract motor activity in the opossum.
Dig Dis Sci
33:
481-489,
1988[Medline].
21.
Takahashi, T,
and
Owyang C.
Vagal control of nitric oxide and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide release in the regulation of gastric relaxation in rat.
J Physiol
484:
481-492,
1995[ISI]