|
|
||||||||
HORMONES AND SIGNALING
1Clinical Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool, The Edwards Building, Liverpool; and 2The Physiological Laboratory, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Submitted 5 March 2004 ; accepted in final form 4 August 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ca2+ mobilization; patch-clamp; K+ channel; Cl channel
In pancreatic acinar cells, the Ca2+ signal elicited in response to a low level of stimulus may be entirely restricted to the luminal pole of the cell (6, 24), which has led to the hypothesis that the cell employs localized, targeted Ca2+ signals as an energy-efficient mechanism with which to regulate secretion (12). A problem in more generally applying this model to acinar cells arises because pancreatic secretion is differently regulated to salivary or lacrimal gland secretion.
In the pancreas, 1) secretion is regulated both by neurotransmitter release (ACh) and by circulating hormone (CCK); 2) exocytosis is driven by CCK and mediated by increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i); and 3) in many species, the duct, rather than the acinar cells, contribute the bulk of fluid secretion (14, 27).
In contrast, in salivary and lacrimal glands, 1) secretion is controlled entirely by neurotransmitter release (5); 2) exocytosis is regulated by noradrenaline release mediated by cAMP (17); and 3) acinar cells, under the control of ACh and increased [Ca2+]i, produce most of the fluid component of secretion (16).
A key difference then between the cell types is that the Ca2+ signal in pancreatic acinar cells regulates exocytosis, whereas the Ca2+ signal in salivary and lacrimal cells regulates fluid secretion. There is therefore no reason to assume that local Ca2+ signals can make a useful contribution to the regulation of fluid secretion in salivary and lacrimal glands simply because they have been shown to be effective in the regulation of protein secretion in pancreatic cells. Conversely, the most common model of salivary gland fluid and electrolyte secretion incorporates simultaneous activation of a basolateral K+ channel (13, 18) and an apical Cl channel on the grounds that activation of the K+ channel is necessary to maintain the driving force for Cl efflux from the cell (21, 26). It follows that a Ca2+ signal restricted to the apical pole would not activate the Ca2+-dependent K+ channel, and thus fluid secretion could not occur because of the lack of driving force (6).
Previous work has indicated that, as in pancreatic acinar cells, global Ca2+ signals in lacrimal (25), parotid (6, 11), and submandibular (10) acinar cells start from the apical pole of the cell. What is not known is whether Ca2+ signals in fluid secreting acinar cells invariably propagate across the whole cell or whether they may be spatially restricted to the apical pole. A recent study (6) indicates that the former is the case in rat parotid acinar cells. We have used a combination of patch-clamp and microfluorimetry techniques to address this question in mouse submandibular acinar cells. The pulse protocol variant of the patch-clamp whole cell technique allows near simultaneous measurement of both the Ca2+-activated Cl conductance and the Ca2+-activated K+ conductance. Thus we can monitor changes in [Ca2+]i simultaneously with the effects on the change in [Ca2+]i on the Ca2+-dependent ion channels that underlie secretion.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For each experiment, cells were allowed to settle onto a poly-L-lysine-coated coverslip that formed the base of a perfusion chamber and was placed on the stage of an inverted microscope (model TMD 100; Nikon, Kingston Upon Thames, UK) Cells were superfused continuously at 0.5 ml/min from one of several parallel superfusion pipettes. The solution bathing the cell could be changed in 1 to 2 s. All experiments were carried out at 24 ± 2°C.
A monochromater (Applied Imaging, Sunderland, UK) provided excitation light at 340 and 380 nm, and images of light emitted at 510 nm were captured using a charge-coupled device camera (Photonic Science, Robertsbridge, Sussex, UK). Pairs of images were captured every 120 to 500 ms, depending on the degree of time averaging used. Ratioed images were generated on-line and were subsequently saved and analyzed using the QuantiCell 700 M software package (Applied Imaging). [Ca2+]i was calculated from this ratio using the Grynkiewiez equation. Images presented in the figures have been background corrected and median filtered to remove noise. The cells were loaded with fura-2 either by incubation for 510 min in the presence of 1 µM fura-2 AM (Molecular Probes, Cambridge Bioscience, Cambridge, UK) or with fura-free acid (Molecular Probes) via the patch pipette.
The patch-clamp whole cell configuration was achieved with single cells using 2 to 4 M
patch-clamp pipettes pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (Clark Electromedical Instruments, Reading, UK). Access resistance through the patch-clamp pipette was
3 times that of the pipette itself. Cells were voltage clamped to 40 mV using an Axopatch 200a patch-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). K+ and Cl currents were measured separately by pulsing to 0 mV and 80 mV, respectively, for 100 ms twice a second. Currents were digitized using the CED 1401 interface (Cambridge Electronics Design, Cambridge, England) and were stored and analyzed using a personal computer with custom written software (20).
The patch-clamp pipette contained (in mM) 140 KCl, 1.13 MgCl2, 10 glucose, 0.5 EGTA, and 1 ATP, buffered to pH 7.4 with 10 HEPES. Where indicated in the text and figure legends, the pipette also contained fura-2 AM (100 µM) and/or inositol(1,4,5)trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3;, 50 µM]. Ins(1,4,5)P3 was a kind gift from Robin Irvine, Cambridge, UK.
The extracellular bathing solution contained (in mM) 140 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 1.13 MgCl2, 1.2 CaCl2, and 10 glucose, buffered to pH 7 with 10 HEPES.
Unless otherwise indicated, drugs and chemicals were obtained from Sigma (Poole, Dorset, UK) and BDH (Lutterworth, Leicester, UK).
Many of the experiments shown here take advantage of access to the cell interior offered by the patch-clamp whole cell technique to infuse substances into the cell. In all such experiments, these substances were added to the intracellular medium at the start of the experiment and thus entered the cell as soon as the breakthrough to the whole cell condition was achieved.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
A typical response to a low dose of ACh (550 nM) is shown in Fig. 2. In this experiment, one of several adjacent cells was loaded with fura-2 through the patch pipette. The train of brief, transient, increases in [Ca2+]i evoked by ACh did not spread from the apical pole of the cell (Fig. 2, A and C). The patch-clamp data (Fig. 2D) show activation of the Cl current only. Comparison of the data in Fig. 2C to that in Fig. 2D shows a clear temporal correspondence between the peaks of the Ca2+ signal and those of the Cl current. There was a small, gradual increase in [Ca2+]i at the basal pole of the cell, which did not increase the K+ current. In a series of 30 microfluorimetric experiments, which includes those in which ion currents were simultaneously measured using patch-clamp techniques, responses that were largely or completely restricted to the apical pole of the cell were observed 7:10 times using 20 nM ACh, 5:15 times using 50 nM ACh, and 0:17 times using 500 nM ACh. In a concurrent series of patch-clamp experiments, responses that were largely or completely manifest in the Cl current were observed: 6:8 times using 5 or 10 nM ACh, 9:16 times using 20 nM ACh, 8:24 times using 50 nM ACh, and 0:9 times using 500 nM ACh.
|
Data similar to that shown in Fig. 2 were obtained by infusion of 50 µM Ins(1,4,5)P3 into the cell via the patch-clamp pipette and are shown in Fig. 3. In this experiment, one of three adjacent cells was loaded with fura-2 through the patch-clamp pipette. Again, the brief transient increases in [Ca2+]i were restricted to the apical pole of the cell and caused activation of the Cl and not the K+ current. The position of the pipette on the cell is visible as a "hot spot" on the Ca2+ image. It should be noted that the pulsatile Ca2+ signal in these cells occurred at the apical region of the cell and not around the pipette in which the Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration would be greatest. Identical results were obtained in 3:3 experiments in which [Ca2+]i and ion channel activation were measured simultaneously. In a separate series of 31 patch-clamp experiments, responses that were largely or completely manifest in the Cl current were observed: 6:10 times using 1 µM Ins(1,4,5)P3, 5:9 times using 10 µM Ins(1,4,5)P3, 3:7 times using 50 µM Ins(1,4,5)P3, and 0:5 using 100 µM Ins(1,4,5)P3.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data show first that all agonist or Ins(1,4,5)P3-evoked Ca2+ signals originate at the apical pole of mouse submandibular cells. The response to intermediate or high concentration of agonist or Ins(1,4,5)P3 takes the form of a Ca2+ wave that moves rapidly from the apical to the basal pole. This has been previously observed in all exocrine acinar cells, but what has not been shown previously is the precise correspondence between propagation of the wave across the cell and activation of the K+ and Cl currents. As shown in Fig. 4, activation of the Cl current occurs simultaneously with initiation of the Ca2+ signal at the apical pole, and activation of the K+ current occurs only when the Ca2+ wave reaches the basolateral region. These data indicate that the Cl channels are apically located and that the K+ channels are basolaterally located. This distribution of the channels has been assumed for many years and is fundamental to most models of fluid secretion; however, it has never actually been shown in a fluid-secreting cell type (28).
Further confirmation that the apical membrane of the cell contains only Cl channels is shown by the response of the cells to stimulation by low concentrations of agonist or Ins(1,4,5)P3. This gentle stimulation produced repeated small increases in [Ca2+]i at the apical pole only and simultaneous activation of the Cl current only. Furthermore, the two were precisely synchronized. Such a precise temporal correspondence can result only from a close spatial congruence between the localized Ca2+ signal and the Ca2+-activated Cl channels. Localized Ca2+ signals, which do not spread from the apical pole of the cell, have not previously been observed in fluid-secreting acinar cells.
Our first conclusion is, therefore, that mouse submandibular acinar cells, unlike rat parotid acinar cells (6), may be shown to produce localized Ca2+ signals. The implication of this conclusion is that localized Ca2+ signals are not solely the province of pancreatic exocrine acinar cells (24) in which their primary function is to regulate protein secretion (12), but rather that local Ca2+ signals may be associated with both protein and fluid secretion. Obligate global Ca2+ signals are not, therefore, a characteristic of fluid secreting acinar cells.
Having shown that fluid secreting acinar cells are capable of local Ca2+ signals that give rise to activation of the Cl and not the K+ current, the second question is whether these Ca2+ signals can serve any useful purpose in the regulation of fluid secretion. The conventional model for fluid secretion (21, 26) is that simultaneous, Ca2+-dependent activation of the K+ and Cl channels permits Cl efflux across the apical membrane (which drags Na+ across the tissue to preserve electroneutrality and then fluid by osmosis), whereas K+ efflux across the basolateral membrane preserves the driving force for Cl efflux. At first glance, it would appear that activation of the Cl current alone would not be sufficient to support fluid secretion. However, closer examination of the model indicates that this may not the case.
First, Cl efflux from the cell will occur for as long as the membrane potential is more negative than the Nernst or reversal potential for Cl. There is no requirement for increased K+ conductance in order for this condition to be met. The observation that resting acinar cells have a K+-sensitive cell negative membrane potential in the absence of stimulation (4, 19) indicates that these cells have a significant K+ conductance at rest. Only if this K+ conductance vanished or was displaced by, for example, a Na+ or nonselective conductance could the membrane potential fall to the Nernst potential for Cl. Our patch-clamp data demonstrate that neither of these phenomena occurs.
The second reason why fluid secretion may occur after Ca2+-activation of the Cl conductance only is that the K+ channel in submandibular acinar cells is voltage as well as Ca2+ activated (4). Our patch-clamp experiments are conducted under voltage-clamp conditions that prevent stimulus-evoked changes in membrane potential. These are optimal conditions for showing Ca2+ activation of ion channels and show that the K+ channel is not Ca2+-activated by local Ca2+ signals. Under open-circuit conditions, the situation that prevails in vivo, Ca2+ activation of the Cl channels will depolarize the membrane potential, and this depolarization will itself activate the K+ channels. An agonist-evoked membrane depolarization of 20 mV (see Fig. 5) could increase the K+ conductance 5- to 10-fold (4). In short, depolarization of the membrane potential in submandibular cells is a self-limiting phenomenon, even in the absence of a global Ca2+ signal, because it stimulates increased K+ channel activity and membrane repolarization.
Distinctive "signature" patterns in Ca2+ signaling have been and continue to be reported in a wide range of cell types (13, 8, 9, 15, 23). There are many factors that determine the spatial and temporal characteristics of a Ca2+ signal, including the agonist and the second messengers that initiate the Ca2+ cascade (2) and cellular geometry, including the state and distribution of organelles, especially the endoplasmic reticulum (7) and mitochondria (8, 9). However, it is as important to determine whether a particular signature Ca2+ signal can support the primary function of a cell as it is to identify the Ca2+ signature in the first place. The most simple argument to justify local, apical, Ca2+ signals in acinar cells is that secretion of both protein and fluid occurs at this pole of the cell. Cell-wide increases in [Ca2+]i may be seen as an unnecessary energetic expense (24). We extend the range of Ca2+ signaling signatures seen to fluid-secreting acinar cells by showing submandibular acinar cells to be capable of highly localized Ca2+ signals. Furthermore, we show how the impact of an apically restricted Ca2+ signal may extend to the whole cell by means of a transient depolarization of membrane potential mediated by activation of apically located Cl channels. Fluid secretion is clearly supportable under these condition, and therefore a Ca2+ signal that originates from and is restricted to the apical pole of the cell is therefore a useful signature signal in fluid secreting acinar cells.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Shintani, C. Hirono, M. Sugita, Y. Iwasa, and Y. Shiba Suppression of carbachol-induced oscillatory Cl- secretion by forskolin in rat parotid and submandibular acinar cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): G738 - G747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakamoto, V. G. Romanenko, A. Takahashi, T. Begenisich, and J. E. Melvin Apical maxi-K (KCa1.1) channels mediate K+ secretion by the mouse submandibular exocrine gland Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): C810 - C819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Won, W. J. Cottrell, T. H. Foster, and D. I. Yule Ca2+ release dynamics in parotid and pancreatic exocrine acinar cells evoked by spatially limited flash photolysis Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): G1166 - G1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. Romanenko, T. Nakamoto, A. Srivastava, T. Begenisich, and J. E. Melvin Regulation of membrane potential and fluid secretion by Ca2+-activated K+ channels in mouse submandibular glands J. Physiol., June 1, 2007; 581(2): 801 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Dawson, P. C. Fox, and P. M. Smith Sjogrens syndrome--the non-apoptotic model of glandular hypofunction Rheumatology, July 1, 2006; 45(7): 792 - 798. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yamamoto, J. R. Reeve Jr., D. A. Keire, and G. M. Green Water and enzyme secretion are tightly coupled in pancreatic secretion stimulated by food or CCK-58 but not by CCK-8 Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): G866 - G879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |