|
|
||||||||
LIVER AND BILIARY TRACT
Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Therapeutics, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202
Submitted 16 March 2004 ; accepted in final form 22 October 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
myosin regulatory light chain; vascular smooth muscle; protein kinase A; Rp-cAMPS
Subsequent studies from our laboratory established a link between glucagon and the loss of vasoconstrictor effectiveness in portal hypertension and further demonstrated that the altered vascular responses in portal hypertension were primarily attributable to cAMP- but not cGMP-dependent events (37). Although the relaxation of vascular smooth muscle by cAMP is known to involve reduced Ca2+ influx via L-type calcium channels and increased uptake of Ca2+ by the sarcoplasmic reticulum (13, 23), little is known about the consequences of chronic vasodilator stimuli on phosphorylation of myosin, which is arguably the single most important biochemical event leading to smooth muscle contraction.
Recent studies by Taylor et al. (34) have provided evidence that cyclic nucleotide-mediated attenuation of agonist-induced arterial constriction results not only from the regulation of pathways of Ca2+ mobilization but also from a reduction in Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile apparatus. Studies by Adelstein et al. (1) provided evidence that acute elevations in cAMP promote the PKA-catalyzed phosphorylation of inactive myosin light-chain kinase (MLCK) and prevent the Ca2+/calmodulin-mediated conversion of inactive MLCK to active MLCK. Recent reports (12) suggest that phosphorylation of myosin light-chain phosphatase (MLCP) by Rho-kinase leads to the inhibition of MLCP. This event required activation of Rho-kinase by the small GTPase RhoA. In an effort to more precisely define the signaling events leading to vasoconstrictor impairment in portal hypertension, the present study examines possible relationships among the 20-kDa myosin regulatory light-chain (RLC20) phosphorylation, cAMP-dependent events, and RhoA expression in resistance arteries and portal veins (PV).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PV stenosis.
Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and a midline abdominal incision was made. The PV was surgically isolated and stenosed by tying a 3-0 silk suture around the vein and a 20-gauge needle that had been placed next to the vein. The needle was then removed, and the vein was allowed to reexpand to yield a calibrated constriction of the PV. The ligature was located between the porta hepatis and the coronary vein and constricted PV to
30% of its original diameter. The abdomen was closed in layers with suture and metal wound clips. To minimize postoperative discomfort, buprenorphine (0.25 mg/kg body wt) was intramuscularly injected. Animals were returned to the vivarium and allowed to recover for 10 days. Sham-operated rats, in which the PV was surgically isolated but not stenosed, served as controls.
Measurement of RLC20 phosphorylation. Ten days after the initial surgery, rats were anesthetized and euthanized and segments of the superior mesenteric artery, first-order mesenteric artery, and PV were removed for study. Vessel segments were divided into two groups, incubated with physiological salt solution (PSS; in mM: 119 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgSO4, 25 NaHCO3, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 0.027 EDTA, and 5.5 glucose) with or without 50 µM Rp-cAMPS for 30 min at 37°C. The vessel segments were then stimulated with 104 M phenylephrine for 1 min and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Frozen tissues were thawed in a 10% TCA/10 mM DTT/acetone slurry. Each sample was transferred to a homogenizing tube (Kontes Duall Ground Glass Tissue Grinders, Fisher) and 0.5 ml of 10% TCA/10 mM DTT/water were added. Samples were homogenized for 20 s at 70 rpm. After centrifugation (3,000 g for 2 min), sample pellets were washed three times with 500 µl ethyl ether for 5 min each and air-dried in a fume hood. Sample pellets were resuspended in 50 µl urea sample buffer (in mM: 18.5 Tris, 20.4 glycine, 9.2 DTT, and 0.18 EDTA) containing 8 M urea, 4.6% saturated sucrose, and 0.004% bromophenol blue. Urea pellets were added directly to each sample to saturation. Samples were shaken for complete protein solubilization and stored at 70°C until use.
After preelectrophoresis at 400 V for 60 min, 20 µl of each sample were loaded to the glycerol polyacrylamide gel using a minigel system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Electrophoresis was performed at 400 V for 100 min. Gels were gently rinsed in the transfer buffer (192 mM glycine, 25 mM Tris, 0.05% SDS, and 20% methanol). After activation of the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF; Immobilon-P, Millipore, Bedford, MA) membrane in methanol, proteins were transferred to membrane at 25 V for 1 h in ice-cold transfer buffer. Membranes were fixed in 0.4% glutaraldehyde (8% stock grade I, Sigma) for 30 min at room temperature and washed in PBS. Membranes were blocked in 5% liquid block (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ)/PBS for 60 min. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with 1:15,000 dilution of smRLC monoclonal antibody (a generous gift of Dr. Kristine Kamm, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) in 5% block/PBS. After incubation with primary antibody, membranes were washed in PBS and then incubated with 1:10,000 anti-mouse IgG(H+L)-alkaline phosphatase (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL) for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated in assay buffer (50 mM Tris and 1 mM MgCl2) and subsequently in reaction buffer {disodium 3-(4-methoxyspiro-{1,2-dioxetane-3,2'-(5'-chloro)tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan}-4-yl)phenyl phosphate (CSPD), enhancer, and assay buffer} for 5 min. CSPD substrate and sapphire enhancer were purchased from Tropix (Bedford, MA). The ratio of phosphorylated RLC20 bands (both mono- and diphosphorylation) to total RLC20 bands was determined by densitometry (Fluor-S, Bio-Rad) using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
RhoA mRNA expression. Total RNA was isolated from vessels using TRIzol reagent purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using Oligo(dT)1218 primer, Rnase H. Maloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and the total RNA of both first-order mesenteric arteries and PVs as the template according to the instruction of SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR from Invitrogen. The following primers were used in PCR as previously reported (6, 21) (GenBank accession nos. AY026068, AY026069, and D84477 for RhoA): RhoA forward primer, 5'-ACCAGTTCCCAGAGGTTTATGT-3'; RhoA reverse primer, 5'-TTTGGTCTTTGCTGAACACT-3'; glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH) forward primer, 5'-TCCCTCAAGATTGTCAGCAA-3'; GAPDH reverse primer, 5'-AGATCCACAACGGATACATT-3'. The expected sizes of the PCR products for RhoA and GAPDH were 410 and 308 bp, respectively. Polymerase chain reactions for RhoA and GAPDH were performed from the same first-strand cDNA. Twenty-eight cycles, 92°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 30 s, were performed in PCR. PCR products were separated with electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel and then confirmed by sequencing. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide and photographed under ultraviolet light. Data are expressed as RhoA/GAPDH ratio changes to control using UN-SCAN-IT gel quantification software (Silk Scientific, Orem, UT).
Western blot analysis of RhoA. Fractionation was done according to the previous report (32). In brief, vessels were homogenized with a glass homogenizing tube in ice-cold buffer (in mM: 250 sucrose, 10 Tris, pH 7.5). Homogenates were centrifuged at 700 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was centrifuged at 17,000 g for 45 min at 4°C. The resulting pellet was enriched in plasma membrane, and the supernatant was enriched in cytosolic proteins. The pellet was recovered in PBS with protease inhibitor cocktail. Forty micrograms of proteins of each sample were loaded in each lane of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes and then blocked with 5% liquid block (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at room temperature for 1 h. The membranes were treated with 1:100 anti-RhoA monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) overnight at 4°C. After the membranes were washed with PBS, we incubated them with 1:10,000 goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at room temperature for 1 h. Immunoreactivity was assessed with an enhanced chemiluminescent Western blot detection system. The bands were scanned and quantified by UN-SCAN-IT gel software. Results are expressed as the ratios to control values.
Statistics. Differences in phosphorylated RLC20 ratios and RhoA protein levels among four subgroups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Newman-Keuls multiple comparison post hoc test was used to identify statistical differences between subgroups. Differences in RhoA mRNA expression between two groups were analyzed by Student's t-test. Data are shown as means ± SE, and P < 0.05 is considered a significant level of difference.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
40%, RLC20 can be diphosphorylated. This is consistent with our rat smooth muscle cell (A7r5 cell line) data (not shown in the present study). Figure 2 shows a representative gel separating RhoA and GAPDH bands in control and portal hypertensive first-order mesenteric arteries (A1) and PVs and a representative gel illustrating the differences in RhoA mRNA expression of first-order mesenteric arteries between control and portal hypertension groups after Rp-cAMPS treatment. Portal hypertension significantly reduced the RhoA mRNA expression in first-order mesenteric arteries (0.54 ± 0.14 vs. 1.00 ± 0.13, P < 0.05, n = 5), but not in PVs (1.14 ± 0.15 vs. 1.00 ± 0.12, P > 0.05, n = 8). Acute inhibition of PKA (50 µM Rp-cAMPS in vitro treatment for 30 min) did not change the RhoA mRNA expression in portal hypertensive first-order mesenteric arteries (0.44 ± 0.05 vs. 1.00 ± 0.14, P < 0.01, n = 5).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-agonists, and nitric oxide can cause active vasorelaxation, through cyclic nucleotide-dependent pathways (19). Whereas the short-term actions of these agents have been widely studied, the long-term consequences of chronically vasodilated conditions on vascular smooth muscle signaling remain largely unstudied. Chronic portal hypertension represents a condition whereby the vascular smooth muscle is exposed to vasodilators for extended periods of time. One of the vascular sine qua non of portal hypertension is the hyperdynamic circulation that is characterized by reduced vascular resistance and increased cardiac output. The reduced peripheral vascular resistance has been linked to the increased circulating vasodilators and a reduced arterial vasoconstrictor effectiveness. Studies from our laboratory have provided evidence that the reduced vasoconstrictor effectiveness is a consequence of the portosystemic shunting of vasodilator substances rather than a consequence of elevated portal venous pressure (10, 11, 35). Furthermore, we have provided direct evidence that cAMP- but not cGMP-dependent events underlie the impaired responsiveness to norepinephrine (37). Despite considerable functional data supporting our contention, there is little evidence regarding the biochemical events that govern vascular smooth muscle activation in the portal hypertensive mesenteric vasculature. In the present study, we report a decreased ability of portal hypertensive resistance arteries to phosphorylate 20-kDa RLC20 during agonist-induced constrictor stimuli. Impairment of this key regulatory event is consistent with previously published functional data demonstrating an impaired vasoconstrictor responsiveness in this condition. In addition to this observation, we provide the first direct evidence linking cAMP to reductions in agonist-induced myosin phosphorylation observed in portal hypertension. These observations provide direct support of our earlier functional work in which norepinephrine-induced vasoconstrictor effectiveness was restored to normal in portal hypertensive animals treated with Rp-cAMPS, an inhibitor of PKA (37). Rp-cAMPS is a competitive inhibitor of PKA I and II (2, 26). It discriminates between PKA and other cAMP receptors, e.g., catabolite gene activator protein (cAMP receptor protein) or cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (16, 27). Therefore, it is generally accepted that Rp-cAMPS is a specific inhibitor of PKA. Previous studies by independent research teams have demonstrated that treatment of smooth muscle with forskolin, the adenylate cyclase activator, decreased myosin light-chain phosphorylation (30, 31, 33). The fact that RLC20 phosphorylation in control arteries was not altered by Rp-cAMPS leads us to conclude that inhibition of cAMP-dependent events does not further increase RLC20 phosphorylation in normal conditions. To this end, the activation of cAMP-dependent events, such as in portal hypertensive condition (9), accounts for the decreased myosin light-chain phosphorylation in smooth muscle. It is not surprising that our results did not show a reduced RLC20 phosphorylation in portal hypertensive superior mesenteric artery. Previous studies by Joh et al. (10, 11) showed that the reduced vasoconstrictor function in portal hypertension was more pronounced in the smaller resistance vessels. To this end, our present findings corroborate an earlier functional observation.
For the myosin phosphorylation in PV, we had similar findings. The behaviors of the PV in portal hypertension are more complicated. An earlier study showed an increased vascular responsiveness of PV to 5-HT in portal hypertensive conditions (4). Thus mechanisms other than cAMP-dependent myosin phosphorylation, such as myosin light-chain phosphatase regulatory subunit (MYPT1) isoform switching (24), caldesmon phosphorylation (7), actin polymerization, and small heat-shock protein phosphorylation (3), may account for the vascular behavior changes in the superior mesenteric artery and PV in portal hypertension.
There are several possible mechanisms whereby elevations in cAMP could lead to reductions in vascular smooth muscle responsiveness to vasoconstrictor stimuli. Previous studies by Adelstein et al. (1) have suggested that PKA-mediated phosphorylation of MLCK can prevent smooth muscle activation. A subsequent study by Stull et al. (29) failed to support the hypothesis of Adelstein and showed that PKA does not affect smooth muscle contractility by phosphorylating site A in MLCK in vivo. In view of these findings, one must consider alternative pathways when examining a mechanism of cAMP-dependent modulation of vascular smooth muscle contraction in portal hypertension. In the present study, we report a restoration of RLC20 phosphorylation following short-term inhibition of PKA. Because RLC20 phosphorylation is determined by the balance of MLCK/MLCP activity, one possible explanation for our findings is that MLCP is activated in portal hypertension, thereby favoring RLC20 dephosphorylation. We suggest that changes in RhoA, a monomeric GTPase, may explain cAMP-dependent changes in vascular smooth muscle myosin phosphorylation in portal hypertensive conditions. It is well established that RhoA binding with GTP can activate Rho-kinase (a serine/threonine kinase), which phosphorylates the regulatory subunit of MLCP (MYPT1) and inhibits MLCP activity (12). Gq and other trimeric G proteins can activate RhoA (8). In the present study, RhoA mRNA expression in portal hypertensive first-order mesenteric arteries was significantly lower when compared with controls. These findings are consistent with the idea that MLCP activity may also be altered in portal hypertension. The inability of PKA inhibition to return RhoA mRNA levels to normal is most likely due to the short period of Rp-cAMPS treatment, which did not allow for RhoA transcriptional events to be realized. Inasmuch as membrane-associated RhoA·GTP is the active RhoA (28) and the fact that RhoA activity is consistent with membrane-associated RhoA protein level (32), we further measured RhoA protein expression levels in both membrane and cytosolic fractions. Acute inhibition of PKA had no effect on cytosolic RhoA levels of portal hypertensive resistance arteries. However, PKA inhibition restored membrane-associated RhoA protein levels to normal. We interpret these findings to indicate that RhoA translocation, but not the transcriptional expression level, is responsible for the restoration of myosin phosphorylation following short-term inhibition of PKA.
Evidence from studies by other laboratories supports our findings. PKA phosphorylates RhoA on Ser188 in natural killer cells, and RhoA translocates toward the cytosol (17). Ht31/Rt31, the first PKA-anchoring protein (AKAP) that has the potential to integrate Rho and PKA signaling pathways, has been identified (15). Moreover, studies in lymphoid and endothelial cells have shown that PKA inhibits RhoA activation (18, 25). Furthermore, cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor rolipram, which blocks cAMP degradation, led to activation of PKA, reduction of active RhoA, as well as decreased RLC20 phosphorylation at Ser19 (5). In view of these facts, we suggest a possible link among RhoA, AKAPs, and elevations in cAMP-dependent vasodilators.
We propose that reduced RhoA expression in portal hypertensive resistance vasculature is regulated by cAMP- dependent events and contributes to the reduced myosin phosphorylation by altering MLCP activity. Future studies examining the effects of portal hypertension on the MLCK/MLCP axis are warranted.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Present address of Hong Yu: Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Hennenberg, J Trebicka, T Sauerbruch, and J Heller Mechanisms of extrahepatic vasodilation in portal hypertension Gut, September 1, 2008; 57(9): 1300 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |