AJP - GI Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290: G871-G875, 2006. First published December 8, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00383.2005
0193-1857/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/5/G871    most recent
00383.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feagins, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Souza, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feagins, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Souza, R. F.

TRANSLATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY

Gain of allelic gene expression for IGF-II occurs frequently in Barrett's esophagus

Linda A. Feagins,1 Nathan Susnow,1 Hui Ying Zhang,1 Stephanie Pearson,1 Charles Owen,1 William F. Schmalstieg,1 Lance S. Terada,1 Stuart J. Spechler,1 Ruben D. Ramirez,1,3 and Rhonda F. Souza1,2

1Department of Medicine, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas; 2Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas; and 3Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas

Submitted 18 August 2005 ; accepted in final form 6 December 2005

ABSTRACT

The IGF-II gene normally exhibits genomic imprinting, a DNA modification that allows the expression of only one of the two inherited alleles. With loss of imprinting, there is a gain of allelic gene expression (GOAGE) due to IGF-II being expressed by both alleles. GOAGE for IGF-II has been demonstrated in a number of malignancies and in normal epithelia surrounding malignancies, but not in epithelia without associated neoplasia. We hypothesized that nonneoplastic Barrett's epithelium might have GOAGE for IGF-II that could facilitate its progression to neoplasia. Endoscopic biopsies were obtained from metaplastic esophageal, normal gastric, and normal duodenal epithelia from 43 patients with Barrett's esophagus. Genomic DNA were analyzed using PCR followed by ApaI restriction enzyme digestion or allele-specific PCR to identify an ApaI polymorphism of IGF-II. cDNA from patients with the ApaI polymorphism were analyzed for IGF-II GOAGE using exon connection PCR, followed by a secondary nested PCR and ApaI restriction enzyme digestion. We found that 13 (30%) of 43 samples of Barrett's metaplasia contained the ApaI polymorphism and were thus informative for IGF-II, and sufficient material was available for GOAGE analysis in 9 of those 13 cases. GOAGE for IGF-II was demonstrated in five (56%) of those nine cases. All patients with GOAGE in Barrett's metaplasia also demonstrated GOAGE in the gastric and duodenal epithelia. In contrast, patients without GOAGE in Barrett's metaplasia also had no GOAGE in their gastric and duodenal epithelia. We conclude that in patients with Barrett's esophagus, GOAGE for IGF-II is found frequently in the metaplastic esophageal epithelium as well as in normal gastric and duodenal epithelia.

gastroesophageal reflux disease; polymerase chain reaction; metaplasia


GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GERD) causes Barrett's esophagus, the condition wherein the normal squamous epithelium lining the distal esophagus is replaced with a metaplastic, intestinal type epithelium that is predisposed to malignancy. Adenocarcinomas develop in Barrett's esophagus at the rate of ~0.5%/yr (24). At the molecular level, carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus involves the accumulation of genetic alterations that endow the cells with certain growth advantages (22). In metaplastic Barrett's cells, such advantages could result from alterations in the expression of growth factors and their receptors. The binding of growth factors to receptors that are members of the protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) family [e.g., EGF receptor (EGFR)] can promote cellular proliferation by activating mitogenic signal transduction cascades. In Barrett's esophagus, cellular levels of EGFR (also called ErbB1) and its ligands, EGF and TGF-{alpha}, have been found to be increased both in the metaplastic epithelium and in adenocarcinomas. This suggests that growth factors and their receptors play a role in the neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus (2, 11).

The IGF-I receptor (IGF-I-R), a tetrameric glycoprotein with intrinsic PTK activity, was recently implicated in the neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus (10). IGF-I-R is located on the surface of almost every cell (1). Ligand binding stimulates receptor autophosphorylation, effecting intrinsic PTK activity that activates signaling cascades regulating the expression of genes involved in cellular proliferation, differentiation, or apoptosis (17, 19). In a recent study, IGF-I-R expression was found in nondysplastic Barrett's epithelium, and the level of expression was found to increase as dysplasia progressed in severity (10). Accordingly, the highest IGF-I-R levels were found in esophageal adenocarcinomas and in their associated lymph node metastases. Those data suggest that alterations in the IGF pathway may be early events in the neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus. However, that study did not investigate the role of IGF-II, an IGF-I-R ligand that has potent proproliferative and antiapoptotic effects that appear to contribute to the development of a number of human tumors (25).

The IGF-II gene normally exhibits genomic imprinting, a reversible modification of DNA that allows gene expression from only one of the two inherited alleles (8). Loss of imprinting (LOI) of the IGF-II gene results in a gain of allelic gene expression (GOAGE) by permitting IGF-II expression from both alleles, thereby increasing IGF-II production to levels that might contribute to carcinogenesis. Indeed, GOAGE for IGF-II has been shown to stimulate cell growth and prevent apoptosis through signaling via IGF-I-R (15). GOAGE for IGF-II was first reported in childhood tumors such as Wilms' tumors but has since been found in adult tumors, including hepatocellular, gastric, colonic, and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (3, 5, 13, 14, 28). GOAGE of IGF-II has also been found in adenomatous polyps in the colon, an observation suggesting a role for the growth factor early in the process of neoplastic progression (5, 27). We have studied GOAGE for IGF-II in the specialized intestinal metaplasia of patients with Barrett's esophagus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and tissue samples. Patients with biopsy-verified Barrett's esophagus who were scheduled for endoscopic surveillance at the Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center were invited to participate in the study. A total of 43 patients with Barrett's esophagus were enrolled, including 31 patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus (≥3 cm of esophageal specialized intestinal metaplasia), 11 patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus (<3 cm of esophageal specialized intestinal metaplasia), and one patient whose length of Barrett's esophagus was not determined. Surveillance biopsy specimens from 39 patients exhibited no histological evidence of dysplasia or cancer, 2 patients had low-grade dysplasia, and 2 patients had high-grade dysplasia or cancer. Written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all patients. Biopsies of Barrett's esophagus, gastric body, and duodenal epithelia were obtained using a jumbo biopsy forceps (Olympus FB-50K-1), immediately snap-frozen, and subsequently stored at –80°C. For RNA extraction, samples were placed in RNA later solution (Ambion, Austin, TX) and stored at 4°C. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Canter.

DNA and RNA isolation. In biopsy samples from the first 25 patients, DNA were extracted using phenol chloroform and RNA were extracted using TRIzol reagent as previously described (21, 23). Technically simpler extraction procedures were used for the biopsy samples from the remaining 18 patients [DNA were extracted using the DNeasy mini kit protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and RNA were obtained using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions]. The DNA and RNA were quantitated using spectrophotometry. Total RNA were treated with RNase-free DNase (Ambion) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions to remove any contaminating genomic DNA (gDNA). cDNA were synthesized using equal amounts of DNA-free total RNA and 100 ng of random primer using SuperScript II RT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. As a control, the reaction was performed on DNA-free total RNA in the absence of RT.

Identification of IGF-II genomic polymorphism. Allelic heterozygosity in IGF-II was determined by performing PCR amplification followed by restriction enzyme digestion or by performing allele-specific PCR amplification using the ApaI restriction enzyme site in exon 9 of the IGF-II gene on gDNA. For biopsy samples from 22 patients, PCR was performed in 50 µl of reaction mixture containing 10 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM 2-deoxynucleotide 5'-triphosphate (dNTP), and 500 nM primers (sense primer, 5'-GGACTTTGAGTCAAATTGGC-3'; antisense primer, 5'-GGGTTGTTGCTATTTTGCCA-3') (20). These primers were designed to amplify a segment of IGF-II containing an ApaI polymorphism. Aliquots (1 µl) of DNA were added to the reaction mixture. Initial denaturation was performed at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 37 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 62°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. AmpliTaq Gold (1.25 U; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used in the "hot start" PCR. Amplified DNA were electrophoresed on agarose gels. IGF-II DNA PCR products were digested overnight using ApaI restriction enzyme (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). After digestion, PCR products were again electrophoresed on 6% polyacrylamide gels and visualized using ethidium bromide staining. Informative samples were identified by the presence of three distinct bands after gel electrophoresis (20).

For the remaining DNA from 12 patients, the technique of allele-specific PCR was performed as previously described (26). Briefly, we used allele-specific 20-mer sense primers designed to anneal with the 3'-end either to the intact ApaI site at nt 820 (HSIGF-II7; GenBank accession no. X07868) primer Y4 (5'-CAGCAAAGAGAAAAGAAGAG-3') or to the corresponding ApaI polymorphism primer N2 (5'-CAGCAAAGAGAAAAGAAGTA-3') (26). Primer specificity for either allele was determined on the basis of the last nucleotide at the 3' position of the primers, which corresponds to the polymorphism (bold), and allele specificity was improved by the introduction of a nt mismatch at position 1 at the 3'-end of the primer (underlined) (26). Both alleles were amplified using the same antisense primer B (5'-GGGTCGTGCCAATTACATTTC-3'). PCR was performed in a total volume of 50 µl for 37 cycles consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 53°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. Each reaction contained 10 ng of genomic DNA, 2.5 µM primer (12.5 pmol total), 1.7 U of AmpliTaq Gold (Roche Applied Biosystems, Indianapolis, IN), and standard amounts of MgCl2, PCR buffer, and dNTP. PCR products were then electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels and stained using ethidium bromide. Samples informative for ApaI polymorphism were identified using a PCR product resulting from primers Y4 and B (allele containing the polymorphism designated allele A) and primers N2 and B (allele not containing the polymorphism designated allele B) corresponding to each of the two IGF-II alleles (26). In a subset of patients, we performed the ApaI PCR followed by the ApaI digestion method in addition to using allele-specific PCR and found that these techniques yielded identical results. The remainder of the study was therefore performed using the far more efficient method of allele-specific PCR.

Allele-specific gene expression using exon connection PCR. After identifying the informative samples as described above, corresponding cDNA were then amplified to assess for monoallelic or biallelic mRNA expression of IGF-II using a nested exon connection RT-PCR as described previously (26). The nested exon connection strategy was used to minimize the interference of small amounts of remaining gDNA in the cDNA preparation in the PCR.

In the first PCR, a cDNA-specific primer pair that spanned the boundaries between exons 8 and 9 of IGF-II was used as described previously (26). The sense primer Z (5'-CCTCCGACCGTGCTTCCGGAC-3'), corresponding to a sequence in exon 8 of IGF-II, was used along with an exon 9-specific antisense primer E (5'-GGATGGGAATTGAGATGTAAG-3') to amplify a 1,101-bp cDNA fragment of the IGF-II gene (26). Each 50 µl of PCR product contained 1 or 5 µl of cDNA (corresponding to 25 or 125 ng of total RNA), 2.5 µM concentrations of each primer (12.5 pmol total), 1.7 U of AmpliTaq Gold (Roche Applied Biosystems), and standard amounts of MgCl2, PCR buffer, and dNTP. PCR was begun with 5-min predenaturation at 95°C, followed by 37 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min.

In the nested secondary PCR, a sense primer A (5'-CTTGGACTTTGAGTCAAATTGG-3') and the antisense primer B described above were used to amplify a 293-bp fragment of exon 9 of the IGF-II gene, which included the ApaI site (26). The 50-µl reaction mixture contained 1 µl of the PCR exon connection PCR product, 2.5 µM concentrations of each primer (12.5 pmol total), 1.7 U of AmpliTaq Gold (Roche Applied Biosystems), and standard amounts of MgCl2, PCR buffer, and dNTP. PCR was begun with a 5-min predenaturation cycle at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 30 s. After being amplified, PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.

RT-PCR products (30 µl) resulting from the nested primers were then digested with 20 U of ApaI restriction enzyme (Roche Applied Biosystems) in 1x ApaI buffer (Roche Applied Biosystems) with a total reaction mixture of 40 µl. After overnight digestion at 30°C, the resulting products were then electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. ApaI digestion of the amplification product from the allele containing an intact ApaI site results in two products: a small 63-bp product (not observed on the gel) and a 230-bp product that can be observed after gel electrophoresis (26). Because the allele without the ApaI site is not digested by the ApaI restriction enzyme, only a single 293-bp product is observed after gel electrophoresis (26). Normally, IGF-II is expressed from only one of the two alleles (8). The finding of both 293- and 230-bp products after ApaI digestion indicates IGF-II gene expression from both alleles.

Statistical analysis. Statistical comparison of patients identified as informative for IGF-II with conventional ApaI digestion and allele-specific PCR was performed using an unpaired Student's t-test with Instat for Windows statistical software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

RESULTS

Identification of the IGF-II genomic polymorphism in Barrett's esophagus. Genomic DNA from 43 Barrett's esophagus biopsy samples were analyzed for the ApaI polymorphism in the IGF-II gene, which allows the detection of two IGF-II alleles. Two PCR-based methods were used to identify the IGF-II alleles. In one method, PCR amplification was performed using primers that flanked the ApaI site, followed by ApaI digestion, and identified 8 (32%) of 25 samples as informative for IGF-II (Fig. 1). In the other method, we used the technically easier approach of allele-specific PCR and identified 5 (28%) of 18 samples as informative for IGF-II (Fig. 2). We found no significant difference in the percentage of patients informative for IGF-II determined on the basis of these two methods (P < 0.05). We then compared the results of PCR and ApaI restriction enzyme digestion with those of allele-specific PCR in a subset of samples and found that both methods produced identical results (Fig. 3). Overall, 13 (30%) of 43 Barrett's esophagus samples were heterozygous and thus informative for IGF-II. Of the 31 patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus, 11 (35%) were informative for IGF-II, whereas in the 11 patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus, only 2 (18%) were informative.


Figure 1
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Identification of the ApaI polymorphism of IGF-II by the conventional ApaI restriction enzyme digestion method in genomic DNA (gDNA) from metaplastic Barrett's esophagus. Informative samples were those containing the ApaI polymorphism in either of the two IGF-II alleles. The polymorphism was identified by detecting three distinct bands on the gel after overnight digestion with ApaI. Representative samples 6B, 26B, 29B, 40B, 45B, and 46B demonstrate the 3 distinct bands detected in patients with the polymorphism and thus were informative for the IGF-II alleles. In samples 32B, 33B, and 39B, both IGF-II alleles contained the ApaI restriction enzyme site.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Identification of the ApaI polymorphism in IGF-II using allele-specific PCR in gDNA from metaplastic Barrett's esophagus. Representative samples 51B, 53B, and 54B demonstrate both allele A (allele with the polymorphism) and allele B (allele without the polymorphism) and thus are informative for IGF-II. Samples 52B, 55B, 57B, 58B, 59B, 60B, 61B, and 62B contain only one of the two alleles for IGF-II.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Identification of the ApaI polymorphism in IGF-II using allele-specific PCR in gDNA from metaplastic Barrett's esophagus previously analyzed using the ApaI restriction enzyme digestion method. Representative samples 29B and 45B demonstrate both allele A and allele B, indicating the presence of the ApaI polymorphism and thus are informative for IGF-II. The same results were found on the basis of analysis using the ApaI restriction enzyme digestion method shown in Fig. 1.

 
Gain of allelic gene expression of IGF-II in Barrett's esophagus. Monoallelic or biallelic expression of IGF-II was determined in cDNA from nine informative patients with Barrett's esophagus using exon connection PCR designed to avoid amplification of contaminating gDNA. (Analysis could not be performed on four patients with Barrett's esophagus because the amount of remaining sample was insufficient.) Of the nine Barrett's esophagus samples, five (56%) demonstrated GOAGE of IGF-II as determined by the finding of biallelic gene expression (Fig. 4). Of those five samples, four were from patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus and one sample exhibited low-grade dysplasia.


Figure 4
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Identification of gain of allelic gene expression (GOAGE) of IGF-II using exon connection PCR in cDNA from informative samples of metaplastic Barrett's esophagus and normal gastric and duodenal samples. Representative Barrett's samples 45B, 46B, 53B, and 54B demonstrate bialleleic expression of IGF-II. Samples 29B and 51B retain monoalleleic expression of IGF-II. Like the corresponding Barrett's tissues, the normal gastric (G) and duodenal (D) samples from patient 51 demonstrated monoalleleic IGF-II expression, whereas biallelelic expression of IGF-II is detected in the duodenal and gastric samples from patients 53 and 54, respectively.

 
Gain of allelic gene expression in matched normal mucosal samples. cDNA from matching normal duodenal and gastric biopsies from six of the nine patients with Barrett's esophagus demonstrating GOAGE of IGF-II were analyzed to determine whether GOAGE of IGF-II was present in normal tissues. (Analysis could not be performed on 3 informative patients with Barrett's esophagus because of insufficient tissue samples.) In all four patients containing GOAGE in the Barrett's esophagus tissues, GOAGE for IGF-II was also found in the matched normal duodenal and gastric tissue that was available for analysis (Fig. 4). In Barrett's tissues that did not demonstrate GOAGE, no GOAGE was found in the matched normal duodenal and gastric tissues.

DISCUSSION

We found a gain in allelic gene expression for IGF-II in five (56%) of nine informative samples of Barrett's specialized intestinal metaplasia. Genomic imprinting is a reversible epigenetic process involving differential DNA methylation between parental alleles (i.e., one allele is methylated and thereby silenced, whereas the other is not). This leads to differential expression of the maternal and paternal genes in somatic cells during development and in adult life. It has been established that the IGF-II gene is normally imprinted so that only the paternal allele is expressed (7). However, when this differential methylation is lost (i.e., when there is LOI), there is a gain in gene expression as a result of IGF-II being expressed by both alleles. GOAGE for the IGF-II gene has been documented in a number of human tumors, including squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (3, 14). Expression of IGF-I-R, the receptor through which IGF-II exerts its mitogenic effects, has been detected in metaplastic Barrett's esophagus. IGF-I-R expression has been shown to increase as the degree of dysplasia in Barrett's epithelium increases, a phenomenon suggesting a role for the IGF pathway in the neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus (10). To our knowledge, our present report is the first to demonstrate GOAGE of IGF-II in metaplastic Barrett's esophagus.

In most other studies of IGF-II GOAGE, genomic polymorphism identification and IGF-II allelic expression have been assessed on the basis of PCR or RT-PCR in combination with ApaI restriction enzyme digestion. However, these methods can be flawed for various reasons, including partial digestion of the PCR products, the presence of digestion-resistant heteroduplexes in the PCR products, and contamination by gDNA (16, 18). These flaws might be responsible for the wide variations in the incidence of IGF-II GOAGE reported in human tumors (29). To overcome the problems introduced by ApaI digestion, the technique of allele-specific PCR was developed in which the sequences of the 3'-oligonucleotide ends are absolutely complementary to the DNA template: one primer to the intact ApaI restriction enzyme site and the other to the ApaI site containing the polymorphism (29). This technique has been shown to be superior to conventional ApaI digestion for investigating IGF-II imprinting (29). In our study, we used both the conventional ApaI restriction enzyme digestion method and the allegedly superior allele-specific PCR method to identify the ApaI genomic polymorphism in DNA from our patients with Barrett's esophagus. We found no significant difference in the percentage of patients informative for IGF-II determined using these two methods, and in a subset of patients, we found that both methods produced identical results. Overall, we found a frequency of informative cases of 30% among our patients with Barrett's esophagus, which is slightly less than the previously reported frequency range of 34–57% in other tissues (26).

Allele-specific PCR does not entirely eliminate the potential error of amplifying gDNA that are contaminating the cDNA preparations. To minimize this error, we treated our total RNA with DNase and followed this with reverse transcription to generate cDNA that were then amplified using exon connection RT-PCR. In this method, cDNA were first PCR amplified using primers that span exons 8 and 9 (the exon connection) of the IGF-II gene, followed by PCR using primers within exon 9 alone (26). By using primers that span exon 8 and 9 in the first of these two PCRs, the amplification of gDNA, which retains intervening intronic sequences, is markedly reduced. Using this technique, we assessed biallelic gene expression of IGF-II in cDNA from metaplastic Barrett's, normal gastric, and normal duodenal epithelia from nine informative patients with Barrett's esophagus. We found GOAGE of IGF-II in five (56%) of nine samples of Barrett's specialized intestinal metaplasia. To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate IGF-II GOAGE in a metaplastic epithelium. The frequency of GOAGE of IGF-II has been reported to range from 25 to 100% in a variety of human tumors (9, 27). In the past few years, however, it has become clear that GOAGE is not limited solely to neoplastic tissue. Indeed, biallelic gene expression of IGF-II has been found in 12–17% of samples of colonic tissue from individuals without colonic neoplasia (6, 27). Furthermore, GOAGE of IGF-II has been found in peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with a personal or familial history of colorectal neoplasia (4). This finding of biallellic IGF-II expression in apparently normal blood lymphocytes suggests that IGF-II GOAGE may be part of a systemic genetic process. The fact that GOAGE in lymphocytes did not correlate with environmental factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, or nutrient ingestion suggests that IGF-II GOAGE may not be acquired in adulthood, but rather can occur early in life (4).

We found GOAGE for IGF-II in five (56%) of nine informative cases of Barrett's specialized intestinal metaplasia. Our study is the first to demonstrate GOAGE for IGF-II in metaplastic Barrett's epithelium. Although the nonneoplastic colonic epithelium surrounding colonic neoplasm has been shown to exhibit GOAGE for IGF-II, the investigators did not search for GOAGE in extracolonic tissues (6, 27). In our patients who had GOAGE for IGF-II in Barrett's epithelium, we also found IGF-II GOAGE in biopsy specimens from the stomach and the duodenum. In contrast, the normal tissues from patients whose metaplastic epithelium retained monoallelic expression of IGF-II did not demonstrate GOAGE. These findings further support the hypothesis that GOAGE is a systemic genetic feature but do not provide insight into whether this feature is an inherited characteristic or an epigenetic alteration that occurs during early development (12).

In conclusion, we have shown that GOAGE for IGF-II occurs frequently in the metaplastic mucosa of patients with long- and short-segment Barrett's esophagus. We have also shown that GOAGE for IGF-II occurs in normal gastric and duodenal epithelia from Barrett's patients in whom the metaplastic epithelium demonstrates GOAGE, but not in those without GOAGE in Barrett's esophagus. To our knowledge, this report is the first to describe GOAGE of IGF-II occurring in the metaplastic epithelium of patients with Barrett's esophagus.

GRANTS

This work was supported by the American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Research Award (to L. A. Feagins); the Office of Medical Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Dallas, TX (to R. F. Souza, R. D. Ramirez, and L. S. Terada); the Harris Methodist Health Foundation, Dr. Clark R. Gregg Fund (to R. F. Souza and R. D. Ramirez); Janssen Pharmaceutical Extramural Research Program (to R. F. Souza); Investigator-Sponsored Study Program of AstraZeneca (to S. J. Spechler); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants DK-63621 (to R. F. Souza) and 5T32 DK-07745 (to L. A. Feagins); and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-61897 and HL-67256 (to L. S. Terada).

FOOTNOTES


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. F. Souza, Dept. of Gastrointestinology, MC 111B1, Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4500 S. Lancaster Rd., Dallas, TX 75216 (e-mail: rhonda.souza{at}utsouthwestern.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

REFERENCES

  1. Baserga R. The IGF-I receptor in cancer research. Exp Cell Res 253: 1–6, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Brito MJ, Filipe MI, Linehan J, and Jankowski J. Association of transforming growth factor {alpha} (TGF{alpha}) and its precursors with malignant change in Barrett's epithelium: biological and clinical variables. Int J Cancer 60: 27–32, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Cai YC, Yang GY, Nie Y, Wang LD, Zhao X, Song YL, Seril DN, Liao J, Xing EP, and Yang CS. Molecular alterations of p73 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas: loss of heterozygosity occurs frequently; loss of imprinting and elevation of p73 expression may be related to defective p53. Carcinogenesis 21: 683–689, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cruz-Correa M, Cui H, Giardiello FM, Powe NR, Hylind L, Robinson A, Hutcheon DF, Kafonek DR, Brandenburg S, Wu Y, He X, and Feinberg AP. Loss of imprinting of insulin growth factor II gene: a potential heritable biomarker for colon neoplasia predisposition. Gastroenterology 126: 964–970, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Cui H, Cruz-Correa M, Giardiello FM, Hutcheon DF, Kafonek DR, Brandenburg S, Wu Y, He X, Powe NR, and Feinberg AP. Loss of IGF-II imprinting: a potential marker of colorectal cancer risk. Science 299: 1753–1755, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cui H, Horon IL, Ohlsson R, Hamilton SR, and Feinberg AP. Loss of imprinting in normal tissue of colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability. Nat Med 4: 1276–1280, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. DeChiara TM, Robertson EJ, and Efstratiadis A. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene. Cell 64: 849–859, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Feinberg AP. The epigenetics of cancer etiology. Semin Cancer Biol 14: 427–432, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Hofmann WK, Takeuchi S, Frantzen MA, Hoelzer D, and Koeffler HP. Loss of genomic imprinting of insulin-like growth factor 2 is strongly associated with cellular proliferation in normal hematopoietic cells. Exp Hematol 30: 318–323, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Iravani S, Zhang HQ, Yuan ZQ, Cheng JQ, Karl RC, Jove R, and Coppola D. Modification of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, c-Src, and Bcl-XL protein expression during the progression of Barrett's neoplasia. Hum Pathol 34: 975–982, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Jankowski J, Hopwood D, and Wormsley KG. Flow-cytometric analysis of growth-regulatory peptides and their receptors in Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 27: 147–154, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Jirtle RL. IGF-II loss of imprinting: a potential heritable risk factor for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 126: 1190–1193, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Kim KS and Lee YI. Biallelic expression of the H19 and IGF-II genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett 119: 143–148, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Mori M, Inoue H, Shiraishi T, Mimori K, Shibuta K, Nakashima H, Mafune K, Tanaka Y, Ueo H, Barnard GF, Sugimachi K, and Akiyoshi T. Relaxation of insulin-like growth factor 2 gene imprinting in esophageal cancer. Int J Cancer 68: 441–446, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Moschos SJ and Mantzoros CS. The role of the IGF system in cancer: from basic to clinical studies and clinical applications. Oncology 63: 317–332, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Ogawa O, Eccles MR, Szeto J, McNoe LA, Yun K, Maw MA, Smith PJ, and Reeve AE. Relaxation of insulin-like growth factor II gene imprinting implicated in Wilms' tumour. Nature 362: 749–751, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Petley T, Graff K, Jiang W, Yang H, and Florini J. Variation among cell types in the signaling pathways by which IGF-I stimulates specific cellular responses. Horm Metab Res 31: 70–76, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Rainier S, Johnson LA, Dobry CJ, Ping AJ, Grundy PE, and Feinberg AP. Relaxation of imprinted genes in human cancer. Nature 362: 747–749, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Seely BL, Reichart DR, Staubs PA, Jhun BH, Hsu D, Maegawa H, Milarski KL, Saltiel AR, and Olefsky JM. Localization of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor binding sites for the SH2 domain proteins p85, Syp, and GTPase activating protein. J Biol Chem 270: 19151–19157, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Soejima H and Yun K. Allele-specific-polymerase chain reaction: a novel method for investigation of the imprinted insulin-like growth factor II gene. Lab Invest 78: 641–642, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Souza RF, Lei J, Yin J, Appel R, Zou TT, Zhou X, Wang S, Rhyu MG, Cymes K, Chan O, Park WS, Krasna MJ, Greenwald BD, Cottrell J, Abraham JM, Simms L, Leggett B, Young J, Harpaz N, and Meltzer SJ. A transforming growth factor beta1 receptor type II mutation in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms. Gastroenterology 112: 40–45, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Souza RF, Morales CP, and Spechler SJ. A conceptual approach to understanding the molecular mechanisms of cancer development in Barrett's oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15: 1087–1100, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Souza RF, Shewmake K, Pearson S, Sarosi GA Jr, Feagins LA, Ramirez RD, Terada LS and Spechler SJ. Acid increases proliferation via ERK and p38 MAPK-mediated increases in cyclooxygenase-2 in Barrett's adenocarcinoma cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 287: G743–G748, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Spechler SJ. Clinical practice: Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med 346: 836–842, 2002.[Free Full Text]
  25. Toretsky JA and Helman LJ. Involvement of IGF-II in human cancer. J Endocrinol 149: 367–372, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Vorwerk P, Wex H, Bessert C, Hohmann B, Schmidt U, and Mittler U. Loss of imprinting of IGF-II gene in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res 27: 807–812, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Woodson K, Flood A, Green L, Tangrea JA, Hanson J, Cash B, Schatzkin A, and Schoenfeld P. Loss of insulin-like growth factor-II imprinting and the presence of screen-detected colorectal adenomas in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 407–410, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Wu MS, Wang HP, Lin CC, Sheu JC, Shun CT, Lee WJ, and Lin JT. Loss of imprinting and overexpression of IGF-II gene in gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Lett 120: 9–14, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Yun K, Soejima H, Merrie AE, McCall JL, and Reeve AE. Analysis of IGF-II gene imprinting in breast and colorectal cancer by allele specific-PCR. J Pathol 187: 518–522, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/5/G871    most recent
00383.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feagins, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Souza, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feagins, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Souza, R. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.