AJP - GI Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292: G231-G241, 2007. First published January 19, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00276.2005
0193-1857/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/G231    most recent
00276.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neunlist, M.
Right arrow Articles by Galmiche, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neunlist, M.
Right arrow Articles by Galmiche, J. P.

INFLAMMATION/IMMUNITY/MEDIATORS

Enteric glia inhibit intestinal epithelial cell proliferation partly through a TGF-beta1-dependent pathway

M. Neunlist,1,* P. Aubert,1,* S. Bonnaud,2 L. Van Landeghem,1 E. Coron,1 T. Wedel,3 P. Naveilhan,4 A. Ruhl,5 B. Lardeux,1 T. Savidge,6 F. Paris,2 and J. P. Galmiche1

1INSERM U539, IMAD, University of Nantes, 44035 Nantes, France; 2INSERM U601, 44093 Nantes, France; 3Department of Anatomy, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany; 4INSERM U643, 44093 Nantes, France; 5Technical University Munich, Department of Human Biology, Freising, Germany; 6Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas

Submitted 16 June 2005 ; accepted in final form 14 January 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Although recent studies have shown that enteric neurons control intestinal barrier function, the role of enteric glial cells (EGCs) in this control remains unknown. Therefore, our goal was to characterize the role of EGCs in the control of intestinal epithelial cell proliferation using an in vivo transgenic and an in vitro coculture model. Assessment of intestinal epithelial cell proliferation after ablation of EGCs in transgenic mice demonstrated a significant increase in crypt cell hyperplasia. Furthermore, mucosal glial network (assessed by immunohistochemical detection of S-100beta) is altered in colon adenocarcinoma compared with control tissue. In an in vitro coculture model of subconfluent Caco-2 cells seeded onto Transwell filters with EGCs, Caco-2 cell density and [3H]thymidine incorporation were significantly lower than in control (Caco-2 cultured alone). Flow cytometry analysis showed that EGCs had no effect on Caco-2 cell viability. EGCs induced a significant increase in Caco-2 cell surface area without any sign of cellular hypertrophy. These effects by EGCs were also seen in various transformed or nontransformed intestinal epithelial cell lines. Furthermore, TGF-beta1 mRNA was expressed, and TGF-beta1 was secreted by EGCs. Exogenously added TGF-beta1 reproduced partly the EGC-mediated effects on cell density and surface area. In addition, EGC effects on Caco-2 cell density were significantly reduced by a neutralizing TGF-beta antibody. In conclusion, EGCs have profound antiproliferative effects on intestinal epithelial cells. Functional alterations in EGCs may therefore modify intestinal barrier functions and be involved in pathologies such as cancer or inflammatory bowel diseases.

colon cancer; enteric nervous system


ENTERIC GLIAL CELLS (EGCs) are the most abundant cell type in the enteric nervous system (ENS). EGCs outnumber enteric neurons by a factor of four and share common markers and properties with astrocytes of the central nervous system (CNS) (7, 22). The majority of studies have mainly characterized EGC morphological and electrophysiological properties (7, 13, 22). In particular, EGCs express proteins such as glial fibrillary acidic protein, the calcium-binding protein S-100beta, and vimentin. EGCs ensheathe enteric ganglia and are considered supportive and nutritive components of enteric neurons. EGCs respond by changes in intracellular calcium levels or expression of activation markers such as c-Fos to various mediators released by enteric neurons or by immune cells (22). However, the direct role of EGCs in the control of gastrointestinal function is presently largely unknown.

A major function of the gastrointestinal tract is to control the passage of nutrients and fluids while preventing passage of microorganisms and toxic or noxious agents. This function is regulated by the intestinal epithelial barrier, which is located at the interface of the body and the luminal environment. This barrier is formed by an epithelial cell monolayer that lines the lumen. The epithelium undergoes rapid and constant turnover. Interactions between intestinal epithelial cells and the subepithelial cellular components of the mucosa play a key role in the control of intestinal barrier function under physiological and pathological conditions. It is well known that pericryptal myofibroblasts, which form a sheet underlying the intestinal epithelium, can modulate intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation, increase barrier resistance, and modulate secretory responses of the epithelium to various agonists such as acetylcholine or prostaglandins (4, 12).

Recent studies have shown that the ENS, a major constituent of the mucosa, can also modulate intestinal barrier functions. The ENS is an integrative neuronal network localized along the gut. It is composed of two major ganglionated plexuses: the submucosal plexus and the myenteric plexus located within the intermuscular space. The mucosal layer also contains delicate nerve networks known as the mucosal plexus, which extends within the lamina muscularis mucosae and lamina propria mucosae beneath the epithelial lining.

Studies have shown that enteric neurons can regulate intestinal barrier functions. In particular, activation of human submucosal neurons decrease paracellular permeability (20) and intestinal epithelial cell proliferation (27). However, the role of EGCs in the control of intestinal barrier function is presently unknown.

Recent in vivo studies have also suggested that EGCs could indeed be involved in the maintenance of the intestinal barrier. Indeed, ablation of EGCs in mice using chemical or immune-mediated methods leads to intestinal inflammation, associated with an initial alteration of mucosal (6) and vascular integrity (8). However, whether the alterations of the intestinal barrier was a consequence of intestinal inflammation, an effect of EGC ablation on enteric neurons, or a direct consequence of EGC ablation on intestinal barrier integrity is presently unknown.

Therefore, we used a noncontact coculture system to explore the role of EGCs in the control of a major function of intestinal barrier, i.e., intestinal epithelial cell proliferation. We show that EGCs inhibit intestinal cell proliferation and concomitantly increase the cell surface of intestinal epithelial cell. Furthermore, we identified TGF-beta1 as a mediator secreted by EGC to be involved in the inhibition of cell proliferation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Immunohistochemical and Electron Microscopic Detection of Enteric Glia in Human Mucosa

Fragments of human adenocarcinoma and "healthy" control tissue taken at 10 cm from the tumor were obtained from patients undergoing surgery for colon carcinoma (n = 5 patients). According to the guidelines of the French Ethics Committee for Research on Human Tissues, these were considered as "residual tissues" and were not relevant to pathological diagnosis.

The tunica muscularis with adhering serosal fat was removed, with the submucosal and mucosal layers remaining in place. After fixation in PBS-buffered 4% paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) at 4°C overnight and dehydration in graded alcohols, paraffin-embedded specimens were cut (4 µm) perpendicular to the gut axis. Sections were preincubated with 10% normal goat serum (Dakopatts, X-970) diluted in PBS-0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 30 min followed by incubation with polyclonal rabbit anti-S-100beta (1:400, Dako) diluted in PBS-10% goat serum-0.5% Triton X-100 for 24 h at room temperature. After sections were rinsed in PBS, sections were incubated for 2 h in a buffer solution containing an anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (1:200, Jackson ImmunoResearch). The slides were rinsed in PBS, mounted, and viewed with an Axiophot (Zeiss) equipped with an adequate filter system.

For whole-mount immunohistochemistry, specimens were stretched and pinned flat on wax-based Petri dishes before fixation to achieve optimal spacing of the remaining intestinal layers. After treatment with PBS-0.05% thimerosal (Sigma) overnight and 0.1% NaCNBH3 for 30 min, whole mounts of both the mucosal and submucosal layers were prepared by use of watchmaker's forceps under stereomicroscopic control. Whole mounts were treated with 10% normal goat serum diluted in PBS-0.5% Triton X-100 for 1 h followed by incubation with polyclonal rabbit anti-S-100beta (1:400) diluted in PBS-10% goat serum-0.5% Triton X-100 for 48 h at room temperature. After extensive rinsings in PBS, whole mounts were incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 2 h, rinsed in PBS, and incubated with the avidin-biotin complex (Vectastain ABC Elite kit; Vector, Burlingame, CA) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase according to the instructions of the supplier. Peroxidase activity was detected with the chromogen 4-chloro-1-naphtol, resulting in a dark-blue reaction product. Whole mounts were rinsed in PBS, placed on slides, covered with Aquatex (Merck), and examined with an Axiophot microscope.

For transmission electron microscopy, small samples (~5 mm border length) of the mucosal-submucosal tissue layer were immediately fixed by immersion in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde at pH 7.4 for 24 h. The specimens were postfixed in 1% OsO4 and stained en bloc with 2% uranylacetate. After dehydration in graded alcohols, the specimens were embedded in Araldite. Semi-thin sections were stained with methylene blue and azure II to visualize the regions of interest, in particular the enterocyte lining and the lamina propria mucosae. Ultrathin sections were cut and stained with lead citrate and examined with a transmission electron microscope (Phillips, EM 109). The findings were recorded both by conventional films (Agfa) and a digital image system (analySIS; Soft Imaging System, Münster, Germany).

Enteric Glial Cells

Nontransformed or transformed EGCs were generated as previously described (23). EGC cultures were isolated and purified from enzymatically dissociated preparations of rat longitudinal muscle-myenteric plexus. EGCs were cultured in DMEM (4.5 g/l glucose; GIBCO, Cergy-Pontoise, France) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (GIBCO), 50 IU/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin (GIBCO). EGCs were seeded at a concentration of 50,000 cells/cm2 in 12-wells plates (Corning, Avon, France). Cells were grown to confluence (3 days).

To assess the paracrine effect of EGCs on proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells, EGCs were cultured for 48 h after they reached confluence. Cell culture supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min to remove accidentally transferred cells and stored at –20°C until use as a conditioned medium.

Intestinal Epithelial and Fibroblast Cell Lines

Experiments were performed with four different human intestinal epithelial cell lines with distinct phenotypes. Cells were seeded onto porous filters (12-well Transwell Clear, 0.40-µm porosity; Corning). The Caco-2 cell line (EATCC, Port Down, UK) was cultured in DMEM (4.5 g/l glucose) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM glutamine (GIBCO), 50 IU/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin. The T84 cell line (EATCC) was cultured in DMEM-F12 (1:1; GIBCO) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 50 IU/ml penicillin and 50 µg/ml streptomycin. The HT-29 and the mucus-secreting HT-29-Cl.16E cell lines were cultured in DMEM (4.5 g/l glucose) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 50 IU/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin. The nontransformed rat small intestinal epithelial cell line IEC-6 (EATCC) was maintained in DMEM (4.5 g/l glucose) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin. CCD 18Co cells (normal human colon fibroblasts; ATCC) were cultured in MEM (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acid (GIBCO), 50 IU/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin and seeded at a density of 50,000 cells/cm2. All epithelial cell lines were seeded at a density of 65,000 cells/cm2, except T84 cells, which were seeded at a density of 180,000 cells/cm2.

Coculture Model

One day after epithelial cells were seeded onto Transwell filters, filters were cultured in the presence of EGCs seeded in the bottom of the 12-well plates. Components of the coculture model were cultured with the culture medium for epithelial cells. Half of the culture medium was changed daily.

The resistance of the epithelial monolayer was measured with an EVOM resistance meter (World Precision Instruments) and calculated by subtracting the electrical resistance of a blank insert from the measured value.

Animal Model

Transgenic mice expressing the thymidine kinase gene of the herpes simplex virus (HSV-TK) from the mouse glial fibrillary acidic protein promoter were used in this study (6). The in vivo ganciclovir (GCV) procedure was approved by an independent IACUC committee. Subcutaneous injection of GCV was performed for 7 days in transgenic and nontransgenic mice as previously described (6). Exposure to GCV in transgenic but not in nontransgenic mice caused a significant disruption of the enteric glial network (6). After 14 days of initiating GCV treatment, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 37 kBq of [methyl-3H]thymidine (Amersham) per gram body weight 90 min before the ileum was collected (at ~11:00 AM so as to avoid circadian variation). Tissues were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formal saline (pH 7.2) for 24 h and embedded in paraffin using conventional methods. Paraffin sections (5 µm thick) were rehydrated through graded levels of alcohol and were processed for autoradiography by Ilford K2 photographic emulsion (Amersham). Slides were developed after a 3 wk-exposure in the dark at 4°C. Finally, all slides were counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma) and mounted in Ralmount (Merck). Scoring of intestinal proliferation (>3 silver grains recorded over a blue nucleus) was performed with CRYPTS software as described previously (25) on a minimum of 20 crypt columns per sample using a Nikon x100 oil-immersion objective.

Cell Growth Studies

Cell counting. Epithelial cells were cocultured for various periods of time, harvested with 1% trypsin-EDTA (GIBCO), and homogenized in their respective epithelial cell culture medium. The resulting cell suspensions were counted in a blind fashion with the use of Malassez slides (VWR International, Strasbourg, France).

[3H]thymidine incorporation. After various times in coculture in the presence or absence of EGC, Caco-2 monolayers were incubated alone with DMEM containing [3H]thymidine (0.5 µCi/well) for 12 h. Cells were then removed from the filter with trypsin and harvested by a Titertek cell harvester (Flow Laboratories, Rickmansworth, UK) on a glass fiber filter (Wallac-Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France). The resulting filters were dried and incubated with Betaplate scintillation liquid (Wallac-Perkin Elmer), and beta radioactivity was counted by use of a scintillation spectrometer (Wallac-Perkin Elmer). [3H]thymidine incorporation for each culture duration in the presence or absence of EGC was analyzed with the Microbeta Windows Workstation software (Wallac-Perkin Elmer) and was normalized to the level of [3H]thymidine incorporation measured in Caco-2 cultured alone during the first day.

Protein, DNA, and RNA quantitation. Cell protein and nucleic acids were precipitated in 10% cold TCA for 1 h. DNA and RNA concentrations were determined after hydrolysis with 5% TCA (90°C for 20 min) using the orcinol colorimetric assay for RNA (16) and the diphenylamine reaction for DNA determination (5). Protein content in the insoluble fraction was quantified after acid hydrolysis. Proteins were dissolved in 1 M NaOH and quantified with the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, Marnes La Coquette, France) and BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) as standard. Protein, DNA, and RNA concentrations were expressed as micrograms per well, and protein-to-DNA and RNA-to-DNA ratios were calculated for each coculture condition.

Two-Color Flow Cytometry Analysis of Cell Viability Using Annexin V and Propidium Iodide Staining

After 2–3 days in culture in the presence or absence of EGCs, Caco-2 Transwell filters were washed with 0.1 M PBS before harvesting of Caco-2 cells with trypsin. Cell suspension was then pooled with the supernatant and centrifuged for 10 min at 1,000 g. After centrifugation, the pellet was washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 100 µl of the staining solution of the annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) staining kit (BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France). After a 30-min incubation at room temperature, the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis was determined by two-color flow cytometry using a FACScalibur (BD Biosciences). Results (annexin V- or PI-positive or -negative cells) were expressed as percent of total cells.

Morphological and Immunohistochemical Analysis

After coculture, filter-grown cells were fixed for 1 h in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature. ZO-1, a tight-junction-associated protein, was used to determine the apical cell surface area and detected by immunofluorescence. Filters were preincubated for 30 min in PBS-4% horse serum (Sigma)-0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma). Monolayers were then exposed to a monoclonal mouse anti-ZO-1 antibody, diluted in PBS-horse serum-Triton X-100 (1:500; Zymed, San Francisco, CA), for 1 h at room temperature and washed with PBS. Monolayers were then incubated for 30 min in a buffer solution containing an anti-mouse antibody conjugated to carboxymethylindocyanine (1:500; Beckman Coulter, Roissy, France). Monolayers were mounted and viewed with an Olympus IX 50 (Olympus, Rungis, France) connected to a black and white video camera (model 4910, Cohu). Apical cell surface area was measured with DP-Soft software (Olympus). An average of 456 ± 13 epithelial cells were analyzed for each experimental condition.

RT-PCR Analysis of TGF-beta1 mRNA Levels in EGC

Extraction of total RNA from EGC cells was performed with TriReagent (Euromedex, Mundolsheim, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For reverse transcription, RNA (1 µg) was mixed with 0.5 µg of random hexamer primers (Amersham, Orsay, France), transcription buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT; GIBCO), dNTPs (10 mM each, GIBCO), and RNasin (50 units; Promega, Charbonnieres, France) to synthesize single-stranded cDNA using the Superscript II reverse transcriptase kit (GIBCO) according to manufacturer's instructions in a total volume of 20 µl. Incubation was performed at 42°C for 60 min. PCR amplifications were performed with Goldstar red Taq DNA polymerase (Eurogentec, Angers, France). The cycling conditions were as follows: denaturation for 5 min at 95°C, amplification for 30 cycles, with denaturation for 5 s at 95°C, annealing for 30 s at 55°C, and extension for 45 s at 72°C. The following primers were used as previously described (15): TGF-beta all isoforms (forward: 5'-TACATTGACTTTAGGAAGGA-3'; reverse: 5'-ATCATGTTGGACAACTGCTCC-3'), PCR product size of 252 bp; TGF-beta1 (forward: 5'-CAAAGACATCACACACAGTA-3'; reverse: 5'-GGTGTTGAGCCCTTTCCAGG-3'), PCR product size of 448 bp; beta-actin (forward: 5'-CCTTCCTGGGCATGGAGTCCTG-3'; reverse: 5'-GGAGCAATGATCTTGATCTTC-3'), PCR product size of 201 bp.

After addition of 5 µl of loading buffer (6x; Sigma) and 1 µl of Syber green (1:1,000; Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France), PCR products were loaded onto a 1.5% agarose gel (Eurobio, Ulis, France) and separated by electrophoresis. DNA size markers were run in parallel to validate the predicted sizes of the amplified bands (100-bp DNA ladder; GIBCO). PCR products were visualized with use of the Gel Doc 2000 system (Bio-Rad, Paris, France) and analyzed with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).

Pharmacological Tools

Rat TGF-beta1 levels were determined by ELISA kit (Diaclone, Besançon, France). Immunoneutralization of TGF-beta1 was achieved with a pan-specific TGF-beta antibody (R&D Systems, Lille, France).

Statistics

Data are expressed as means ± SE when normally distributed or as the median (25–75%) when nonnormally distributed. A paired or unpaired t-test, a Mann-Whitney test, and one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni t-test or two-way ANOVA on repeated measures were performed to compare different populations. Differences were considered as significant for P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Mucosal Expression of S-100beta in Healthy Areas and in Human Colonic Adenocarcinoma

Immunohistochemical analysis of human colonic mucosa revealed a prominent honeycomb-like latticework of S-100beta-immunoreactive EGCs surrounding the colonic epithelial crypts (Fig. 1A) and present all along the crypt axis (Fig. 1C). These glial cell networks extended throughout the lamina propria mucosae, forming part of the subglandular and periglandular portions of the mucosal plexus directly located beneath the epithelial lining. In addition, strong S-100beta immunoreactivity was observed in elongated cells accompanying mucosal blood vessels (Fig. 1B), indicating the presence of glial cells ensheathing nerve fibers of the perivascular nerve network. Transmission electron microscopy studies revealed a close topographic proximity between EGC associated with mucosal nerve fibers and the basal lamina of intestinal epithelial cells (Fig. 1D). Distance between EGC and enterocytes ranged between 0.5 and 2 µm.


Figure 1
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Enteric glial cells (EGCs) are closely related to enterocytes. S-100beta-immunoreactive EGCs form dense networks around epithelial crypts (asterisk) (A; x100 magnification) and along the crypt axis (C; x200 magnification), resembling the periglandular (PG) and subglandular (SG) portions of the mucosal nerve plexus. The electron micrograph (D; x20.000 magnification) confirms the close proximity of EGCs (arrow) ensheathing mucosal nerve fibers to enterocytes (EC). Note the short distance (~1.2 µm) between the epithelial basal lamina (arrowheads) and EGCs. Glial cells also form part of the perivascular nerve plexus (arrowheads) adjacent to mucosal blood vessels ramifying within the lamina propria mucosae (B; x100 magnification).

 
Immunohistochemical studies were performed in colonic adenocarcinoma and revealed severe alterations in the mucosal glial network compared with control (taken at distance from the tumor), ranging from altered to complete loss of the glial network (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. EGC network is altered in human colonic adenocarcinoma. S-100beta-immunoreactive EGCs form dense networks around epithelial crypts in tissue distant from the tumor (A and B). In contrast, in colonic adenocarcinoma, alterations of the EGC network range from altered cell morphology (D) to total loss of S-100beta immunoreactivity (C). A and C were taken from one patient and B and D were taken from another. Magnification = x200.

 
In Vivo Ablation of EGCs Increases Intestinal Cell Proliferation and Induces Crypt Hypertrophy

To characterize the role of glial cells on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation, glial cells were specifically ablated in a transgenic mice model previously developed by Bush et al. (6). After glial cell ablation by GCV in transgenic mice, the mean [3H]thymidine labeling index in the intestinal crypts was significantly increased by 51% (n = 4) compared with control mice (Fig. 3). In addition, analysis of the distribution of [3H]thymidine-labeled cells along the crypt-axis revealed 1) that at a given crypt cell position the proliferation index was increased and 2) that labeled cells were distributed further up in the crypt in transgenic animals compared with controls.


Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. In vivo ablation of EGCs increases intestinal epithelial cell proliferation. A: EGC ablation in transgenic mice induced a significant increase in the number of [3H]thymidine-labeled epithelial cells compared with control nontransgenic littermates (n = 4; P ≤ 0.05). B: in transgenic mice ({circ}), the proportion of [3H]thymidine-labeled cells was increased along the crypt axis compared with control (bullet). In addition, besides increased thymidine incorporation, crypt cell hyperplasia was also observed (n = 4 mice).

 
EGCs Increase the "Sealing" of the Filters With Caco-2 Cells

To study the direct effects of EGCs on intestinal epithelial cells, a coculture model was used. After seeding procedures, subconfluent Caco-2 cells cultured alone (control) initially formed clusters of cells. For several days, we observed spaced islands of growing cells (Fig. 4, A and C). In contrast, rapid and drastic changes were observed when Caco-2 cells were cocultured with EGC. Indeed, in the presence of EGC, filter-grown Caco-2 cells did not form large multicellular clusters as observed when cultured alone; instead, the entire filter covered rapidly and uniformly within 2–3 days after seeding (Fig. 4, B and D). After 6 days in culture, the filter was uniformly covered under both experimental conditions (Fig. 4, E and F). These observations were correlated with changes in filter resistance. In the presence of EGCs, a significant and time-dependent increase in the resistance of Caco-2 monolayer was measured compared with that observed in control samples (Fig. 4G). Furthermore, incubation of Caco-2 cells with the conditioned medium from EGC cultures reproduced the effect of coculture with EGCs (Fig. 4G).


Figure 4
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. EGCs increase the "sealing" of filter with Caco-2 cells. In the presence of EGCs, the filter was sealed with Caco-2 cells more rapidly (B: day 1; D: day 2; F: day 6) than under control conditions (A: day 1; C: day 2; E: day 6). This effect was correlated with a greater time-dependent increase in Caco-2 filter resistance (G) in the presence of EGC ({triangleup}) than under control conditions ({lozenge}). The effect of the EGC on filter resistance was also observed with EGC-conditioned medium ({circ}). Values are means ± SE; n = 4 independent experiments. *P < 0.05 compared with control values (one-way repeated-measures ANOVA).

 
Effect of EGCs on Caco-2 Cell Proliferation

We aimed to characterize whether EGCs altered Caco-2 cell density. Under control conditions, Caco-2 cell density increased significantly over time and reached (1.21 ± 0.29) x 106 cells/filter after 6 days in culture. In contrast, in the presence of EGCs, after an initial increase in Caco-2 cell density during the first 48 h, cell density remained constant for up to 6 days in coculture (Fig. 5A). Under control conditions, Caco-2 cell density was significantly higher after 3 days compared with Caco-2 cells cultured in the presence of EGC [(3.8 ± 0.5) x 105 vs. (2.2 ± 0.3) x 105 cells/filter; P < 0.05; n = 4]. In addition, incubation of Caco-2 cells with EGC-conditioned medium significantly decreased the Caco-2 cell density compared with control and with a similar time course as with EGCs (data not shown). After 6 days of culture in the presence of EGC-conditioned medium, Caco-2 cell density was significantly decreased compared with that in control condition [(7.2 ± 1.6) x 105 vs. (12.1 ± 3.0) x 105 cells/filter; P < 0.05; n = 4].


Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. EGCs decrease cell density and [3H]thymidine incorporation in Caco-2 cells. A: in the absence of EGCs (open bars), Caco-2 cell density increased over time. In contrast, after an initial increase, Caco-2 cell density remained constant after 2 days in the presence of EGCs (filled bars). Caco-2 cell density was significantly lower in coculture with EGC after 3 and 6 days of culture. Values are means ± SE; n = 4. *P < 0.02 compared with control values (2-way ANOVA on repeated measures followed by Bonferroni t-test). B: in the absence of EGC (open bars), [3H]thymidine incorporation in Caco-2 cells increased in a time-dependent manner. In contrast, after an initial increase, [3H]thymidine incorporation in Caco-2 remained constant after 2 days in the presence of EGC (filled bars). Furthermore, on days 2 and 3, [3H]thymidine incorporation was significantly lower in Caco-2 cells cultured with EGC than in control Caco-2 cells. Values are means ± SE; n = 4. *P < 0.05 (2-way ANOVA on repeated measures followed by Bonferroni t-test compared with control values).

 
These results were confirmed by assessing [3H]thymidine incorporation. As shown in Fig. 5B, [3H]thymidine incorporation in Caco-2 cells increased significantly over time under control conditions. In contrast, no significant change in [3H]thymidine incorporation was observed in Caco-2 cells when cultured in the presence of EGCs. Furthermore, after 48 and 72 h in culture, [3H]thymidine incorporation was significantly lower when Caco-2 cells were cultured with EGCs than when they were cultured alone (Fig. 5B).

To determine whether changes in cell density were associated with intestinal epithelial cell death, we assessed the effect of EGCs on the viability of Caco-2 cells by two-color flow cytometry analysis after annexin V and PI staining. The vast majority of Caco-2 cells (>90%) cultured or not with EGCs were PI and annexin V negative (Fig. 6), suggesting that Caco-2 cell viability was not affected by EGC. In addition, there was no difference in the percentage of dead cells observed under the different experimental conditions (Fig. 6).


Figure 6
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Effects of EGC on Caco-2 cell survival. Two-color flow cytometry analysis revealed that EGCs did not modify annexin V-propidium iodide (PI) uptake by Caco-2 cells (1 representative experiment is shown). A total of 104 cells were analyzed per experiment. Percentages (3 independent experiments) appear in each quadrant. EGCs (B) did not modify viability of Caco-2 cells compared with control (A), as the majority of Caco-2 cells were not labeled with annexin V or PI. Values are means ± SE.

 
Effects of EGCs on the Surface Area of Caco-2 Cells

To explain the simultaneous increase in the sealing of the monolayer and decrease in density of Caco-2 cells in coculture with EGCs, the effect of EGCs on the surface area of Caco-2 cells was investigated. The apical surface area of individual epithelial cells was assessed by measuring the area of cells labeled with an antibody directed against ZO-1 (Fig. 7, A and B). The surface area of Caco-2 cells was 2.2 times greater when Caco-2 cells were cocultured with EGC than under control conditions (Fig. 7, AC).


Figure 7
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. EGCs increase cell surface area but do not induce Caco-2 cell hypertrophy. Caco-2 cell surface area (measured with ZO-1 as a marker of the apical cell perimeter) was smaller when these cells were cultured alone (A) than when they were cocultured with EGCs (B). Magnification = x200. C: quantitative analysis of 4 independent experiments (means ± SE). *P < 0.001 (paired t-test). D: Caco-2 cells cultured in the presence (filled bars) or absence (open bars) of EGCs had similar RNA-to-DNA and protein-to-DNA ratios (means ± SE; n = 3 independent experiments).

 
These morphological changes may be associated with cellular hypertrophy, where the total amounts of protein and RNA are increased. To verify this hypothesis, we measured the total protein, RNA, and DNA contents of Caco-2 cells grown in control conditions or in the presence of EGC. As illustrated in Fig. 7D, RNA/DNA and protein/DNA were not modified in Caco-2 cells after coculture with EGCs compared with control, showing an absence of cellular hypertrophy.

Effect of EGCs on Cell Density in Other Intestinal Epithelial Cell Lines

To determine whether EGCs are able to decrease cell density in other types of intestinal epithelial cells, we characterized their effect in other transformed and nontransformed intestinal epithelial cell lines. After 6 days in coculture, a significant decrease in cell density (ranging between 72 and 66%) was observed in all transformed cell lines tested (T84, HT-29, and HT-29-Cl.16E) when cultured with EGCs compared with control cultures without EGCs (Fig. 8, AC). Similarly, coculture with EGCs decreased cell density in cultures of nontransformed rat epithelium-derived IEC-6 cells by 76% compared with control (Fig. 8D).


Figure 8
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. EGCs decrease cell density in various intestinal epithelial cell lines. EGCs induced a significant decrease in the cell density with various human transformed intestinal epithelial cell lines HT-29 (A), HT-29-Cl.16E (B), and T84 (C). EGCs induced similar effects in the rat nontransformed intestinal epithelial cell line IEC-6 (D). Values are mean ± SE; n = 4–6 independent experiments. *P < 0.005 (paired t-test).

 
Specificity of the Effects of EGCs on Caco-2 Cells: Effects of Intestinal Fibroblasts

To test whether the anti-proliferative effect of EGCs was specific for EGCs, we investigated the effects of intestinal pericryptal myofibroblasts, another major constituent of the intestinal mucosa. In contrast to the effects observed with EGCs, after 6 days in culture, Caco-2 cell density slightly increased, although not significantly, when cultured in the presence of human intestinal fibroblasts (CCD 18Co) as in control conditions (Fig. 9A). In addition, after coculture with intestinal fibroblasts, [3H]thymidine incorporation in Caco-2 cells was increased compared with control values after 3 days in culture (Fig. 9B).


Figure 9
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Human intestinal fibroblasts increase Caco-2 cell proliferation. A: human intestinal fibroblasts (CCD 18Co) induced a slight increase in the cell density of Caco-2 cells after 6 days in coculture compared with control (mean ± SE; n = 4); P = 0.08 (paired t-test). B: in the absence (open bars) or presence of fibroblasts (filled bars), [3H]thymidine incorporation in Caco-2 cells increased over time. After 3 days in culture, [3H]thymidine incorporation in Caco-2 cells was greater in the presence of human fibroblasts than in control (mean ± SE; n = 4); *P < 0.05 compared with control value (2-way ANOVA on repeated measures followed by Bonferroni t-test).

 
Involvement of TGF-beta on EGC-Mediated Effects

TGF-beta is known to significantly inhibit intestinal cell proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest. We wanted to verify whether EGCs were a source of TGF-beta, which may partly account for the effect of EGC on cell proliferation.

TGF-beta1 mRNA was found to be expressed in EGCs cultured alone or in the presence of Caco-2 cells (Fig. 10A). Furthermore, as assessed by ELISA, TGF-beta1 was secreted by EGCs in the culture medium of EGCs when cultured alone or cocultured with Caco-2 cells (6.7 ± 3.2 and 8.8 ± 1.3 ng/ml, respectively; P = 0.2; n = 4) (Fig. 10B). TGF-beta1 levels in Caco-2 cell culture were below the detection limit of the kit.


Figure 10
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. Expression of TGF-beta1 in EGCs and its role in the control of Caco-2 cell proliferation in coculture. A: semi-quantitative RT-PCR was used to detect TGF-beta1 in EGCs using a primer against all TGF-beta isoforms (lane b) and against the TGF-beta1 isoform (lane c) in EGCs cultured alone or cultured in the presence of Caco-2; beta-actin (lane d) and size markers (lane a) were also detected. B: TGF-beta1 was detected in the supernatant of EGC cultured alone (open bar) or in the presence of Caco-2 (filled bar). Values are means ± SE; n = 4. C: addition of TGF-beta1 to Caco-2 cells cultured alone decreased the cell density after 6 days in culture in a dose-dependent manner. Values are means ± SE; n = 6 independent experiments. *P < 0.05 compared with control values (repeated-measures 1-way ANOVA). D: addition of the neutralizing anti-TGF-beta1 antibody to EGC cocultured with Caco-2 cells (filled bar) significantly increased Caco-2 cell density compared with that observed in control Caco-2 cells cocultured with EGC (open bar). Values are means ± SE; n = 4. *P = 0.003 (paired t-test).

 
TGF-beta1 was also shown to induce a dose-dependent decrease in Caco-2 cell density, leading to a maximum 20% decrease in cell density (Fig. 10C). When Caco-2 cells and EGCs were cocultured, incubation of the basolateral medium with an anti-TGF-beta-neutralizing antibody (10 µg/ml) significantly increased the number of Caco-2 cells. Cell density increased by 38 ± 15% (n = 4; P < 0.05) compared with that in the absence of blocking antibody (Fig. 10D). Addition of the neutralizing antibody to control cultures did not affect the total cell density [(7.5 ± 0.4) x 105 to 106 vs. (7.6.105 ± 0.4) x 105 cells/filter; P = 0,89; n = 5]. Finally, TGF-beta (10 ng/ml) significantly increased the surface area of Caco-2 cells compared with that of Caco-2 cells cultured alone (177 ± 2 vs. 119 ± 1 µm2; n = 4; P < 0.001), reproducing in part the effect of EGC.

Additional experiments also revealed that TGF-beta1 significantly reduced cell proliferation in other intestinal epithelial cell lines tested. Indeed, incubation of IEC-6 and T84 with 10 ng/ml of TGF-beta1 significantly reduced cell number by 14% (n = 9; P < 0.05) and 11% (n = 5; P < 0.05), respectively compared with control.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study combining both in vivo and in vitro models demonstrates that EGCs have strong antiproliferative effects on intestinal epithelial cells. In addition, in vitro studies showed that EGCs increase the apical surface area of intestinal epithelial cell in the absence of cellular hypertrophy. Furthermore, TGF-beta1 was identified as a factor synthesized by EGCs and shown to mediate at least partly the effects of EGCs. Finally, the decreased EGC network observed in colorectal tumors could favor cell proliferation or invasion.

Previous studies have reported in various species (guinea pigs, mice, rats, or humans) that EGCs are abundantly distributed within enteric ganglia and also form dense networks within the intestinal mucosa (7, 11, 14, 18). Our study is in agreement with these previous observations and reveals that, in human healthy colonic mucosa, a dense network of S-100beta-positive EGCs is present along the crypt axis (Fig. 1). The close contact revealed by the electron microscopic study between EGCs (which ensheathe enteric nerves) and epithelial cells strongly suggests that these cell types could interact through a diffusible factor.

A major finding of this study is that EGCs significantly inhibit intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, ablation of glial cells leads to an increase in thymidine incorporation in epithelial cells, indicating an increase in epithelial cell proliferation. However, one cannot exclude that this increase in cell proliferation was associated in response to the intestinal inflammation that occurs in this model (6). Direct evidence of EGC control of cell proliferation is further provided by the in vitro study. Indeed, to characterize direct interactions between EGCs and intestinal epithelial cells, we used a coculture model. Rat EGCs were used because no methods for the isolation and long-term culture of human EGCs are currently available. Although our results need further confirmation in humans, interspecies differences are unlikely to be involved because rats EGC had similar effects on human and rat intestinal epithelial cell lines. We also showed that EGCs exert their action probably through a paracrine mechanism. Indeed, no cell-to-cell contact exists in our model, and the effects of EGCs were reproduced with conditioned EGC culture medium. Furthermore, coculture of EGCs with transformed (HT-29, Caco-2, T84) or nontransformed (IEC-6) intestinal epithelial cell lines suggests that EGCs play a role in the inhibition of primary intestinal epithelial cell proliferation. The profound inhibitory role of EGCs on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation is to oppose the role of another major constituent of intestinal mucosa, i.e., intestinal fibroblasts. Indeed, intestinal fibroblasts have been shown to promote intestinal cell proliferation predominantly through the release hepatocyte growth factor (12).

An important finding of our study is that we identified TGF-beta1 as being synthesized and released by EGCs and mediating in part the effects of EGCs on epithelial cell proliferation and cell surface. The phenotypical characteristics of EGCs have been poorly studied, although it is presently admitted that they synthesize factors similar to those produced by astrocytes of the CNS such as glial-derived neurotrophic factors (2), L-arginine (19), and IL-6 (21). Our study shows that, similarly to CNS astrocytes, EGCs can also synthesize TGF-beta1. In the CNS, TGF-beta1 secreted by astrocytes plays a key role in neuronal homeostasis and, in particular, has a neuroprotective role (9, 26). However, the role of TGF-beta1 in the control of the homeostasis of the ENS remains unknown, although it is tempting to speculate that TGF-beta1 released by EGC acts as a regulator of enteric neuronal survival, as ablation of EGCs leads to enteric neuronal degeneration (6).

The anti-proliferative effect of TGF-beta1 released by EGCs is consistent with the key role played by TGF-beta1 in the control of intestinal epithelial cell proliferation. It has been widely demonstrated that TGF-beta1 inhibits epithelial cell proliferation (3, 16) while stimulating epithelial cell migration (10). In accordance with these findings, our data show that TGF-beta1 inhibits proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, TGF-beta1 levels present in EGC-conditioned medium induces a decrease in the Caco-2 cell density equivalent to the increase in Caco-2 cell density induced by EGCs in the presence of the neutralizing TGF-beta1 antibody. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the inhibition of epithelial cell proliferation were not investigated. However, it is well known that TGF-beta1 induces a significant inhibition of intestinal cell proliferation by promoting cell cycle arrest (24). This effect is either due to a downregulation of the levels and/or activities of G1/S cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases or to an upregulation of the level and/or activities of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (24). Various intracellular pathways, such as MAPK pathways, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase cascade, or small G proteins such as RhoA or Rac, can be directly activated by TGF-beta. Activation of the latter pathways, which have been shown to be involved in the control of cytoskeletal filament assembly, may be partly involved in the increase in cell surface induced by TGF-beta1.

Because TGF-beta1 accounts for ~12–30% of the effects of EGC on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation (depending on the cell line studied) and cell surface, other major factors secreted by EGCs that may mediate these effects remain to be identified. In particular, factors secreted by EGCs that act on the intestinal epithelial cytoskeleton may contribute to increased cell surface area of epithelial cells. This increase in cell surface may be sufficient to induce cell contact-mediated cell cycle arrest. Such a mechanism may be compatible with our model because, before changes in cell number, i.e., during the first 48 h of culture, changes in the cell surface already occurred (unpublished data).

Our study supports the role of EGCs as a major cellular component of the gut involved in the control of the intestinal barrier homeostasis. Our results support in vivo findings that showed that controlled immune-mediated glial cell alteration increases intestinal paracellular permeability (1) and that full ablation of EGCs leads to the disruption of the intestinal barrier (5).

Another potentially important finding of this study is the alterations in the enteric glial network (identified with S-100beta) observed in colon carcinoma. Indeed, although one cannot presently determine whether altered glial cells are involved in tumorigenesis, the absence of enteric glia in tumors could favor cellular proliferation and/or invasion. The cellular nature of the tumor microenvironment has been shown to have a profound impact on tumor development. Therefore, besides fibroblasts or endothelial or immune cells, EGCs could be regarded in the future as an important component regulating the tumoral environment.

In conclusion, our results reinforce the emerging concept that the ENS and, in particular, EGCs are major regulators of intestinal barrier functions and homeostasis. In particular, neuronal and glial components of the ENS could be seen as acting in concert with other components of the mucosa, such as fibroblasts, to finely tune intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and to contribute to the maintenance of the intestinal barrier integrity. In addition, functional alterations in EGCs could be involved in various intestinal pathologies affecting intestinal barrier functions such as cancer or intestinal inflammatory bowel diseases. Identification of other glial cell factors involved in the control of intestinal cell proliferation could therefore be of future great therapeutic interest.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Part of this work was supported by a grant from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (T. Savidge).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors are grateful to the surgery and pathology teams of the University Hospital of Nantes for valuable contributions to this work.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Neunlist, INSERM U 539, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, 1, place Alexis Ricordeau, 44035 Nantes, France (e-mail: michel.neunlist{at}univ-nantes.fr)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

* M. Neunlist and P. Aubert contributed equally to this study. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Aube AC, Cabarrocas J, Bauer J, Philippe D, Aubert P, Doulay F, Liblau R, Galmiche JP, Neunlist M. Changes in enteric neurone phenotype and intestinal functions in a transgenic mice model of enteric glia disruption. Gut 55: 630–637, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bar KJ, Facer P, Williams NS, Tam PK, Anand P. Glial-derived neurotrophic factor in human adult and fetal intestine and in Hirschsprung's disease. Gastroenterology 112: 1381–1385, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Barnard JA, Beauchamp RD, Coffey RJ, Moses HL. Regulation of intestinal epithelial cell growth by transforming growth factor type beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 1578–1582, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Beltinger J, McKaig BC, Makh S, Stack WA, Hawkey CJ, Mahida YR. Human colonic subepithelial myofibroblasts modulate transepithelial resistance and secretory response. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 277: C271–C279, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Burton K. A study of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem J 62: 315–323, 1956.[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Bush TG, Savidge TC, Freeman TC, Cox HJ, Campbell EA, Mucke L, Johnson MH, Sofroniew MV. Fulminant jejuno-ileitis following ablation of enteric glia in adult transgenic mice. Cell 93: 189–201, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Cabarrocas J, Savidge TC, Liblau RS. Role of enteric glial cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Glia 41: 81–93, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Cornet A, Savidge TC, Cabarrocas J, Deng WL, Colombel JF, Lassmann H, Desreumaux P, Liblau RS. Enterocolitis induced by autoimmune targeting of enteric glial cells: a possible mechanism in Crohn's disease? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 13306–13311, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dhandapani KM, Hadman M, De Sevilla L, Wade MF, Mahesh VB, Brann DW. Astrocyte protection of neurons: role of transforming growth factor-beta signaling via a c-Jun-AP-1 protective pathway. J Biol Chem 278: 43329–43339, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dignass AU, Podolsky DK. Cytokine modulation of intestinal epithelial cell restitution: central role of transforming growth factor beta. Gastroenterology 105: 1323–1332, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Ferri GL, Sabani A, Abelli L, Polak JM, Dahl D, Portier MM. Neuronal intermediate filaments in rat dorsal root ganglia: differential distribution of peripherin and neurofilament protein immunoreactivity and effect of capsaicin. Brain Res 515: 331–335, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Goke M, Kanai M, Podolsky DK. Intestinal fibroblasts regulate intestinal epithelial cell proliferation via hepatocyte growth factor. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 274: G809–G818, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hanani M, Francke M, Hartig W, Grosche J, Reichenbach A, Pannicke T. Patch-clamp study of neurons and glial cells in isolated myenteric ganglia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 278: G644–G651, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kobayashi S, Suzuki M, Endo T, Tsuji S, Daniel EE. Framework of the enteric nerve plexuses: an immunocytochemical study in the guinea pig jejunum using an antiserum to S-100 protein. Arch Histol Jpn 49: 159–188, 1986.[Medline]
  15. Koh SW. Ciliary neurotrophic factor released by corneal endothelium surviving oxidative stress ex vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 2887–2896, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Koyama SY, Podolsky DK. Differential expression of transforming growth factors {alpha} and beta in rat intestinal epithelial cells. J Clin Invest 83: 1768–1773, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Lin RI, Schjeide OA. Micro estimation of RNA by the cupric ion catalyzed orcinol reaction. Anal Biochem 27: 473–483, 1969.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Mestres P, Diener M, Rummel W. Histo- and immunocytochemical characterization of the neurons of the mucosal plexus in the rat colon. Acta Anat (Basel) 143: 268–274, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Nagahama M, Semba R, Tsuzuki M, Aoki E. L-Arginine immunoreactive enteric glial cells in the enteric nervous system of rat ileum. Biol Signals Recept 10: 336–340, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Neunlist M, Toumi F, Oreschkova T, Denis M, Leborgne J, Laboisse CL, Galmiche JP, Jarry A. Human ENS regulates the intestinal epithelial barrier permeability and a tight junction-associated protein ZO-1 via VIPergic pathways. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 285: G1028–G1036, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ruhl A, Franzke S, Collins SM, Stremmel W. Interleukin-6 expression and regulation in rat enteric glial cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 280: G1163–G1171, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ruhl A, Nasser Y, Sharkey KA. Enteric glia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 16, Suppl 1: 44–49, 2004.
  23. Ruhl A, Trotter J, Stremmel W. Isolation of enteric glia and establishment of transformed enteroglial cell lines from the myenteric plexus of adult rat. Neurogastroenterol Motil 13: 95–106, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Schiller M, Javelaud D, Mauviel A. TGF-beta-induced SMAD signaling and gene regulation: consequences for extracellular matrix remodeling and wound healing. J Dermatol Sci 35: 83–92, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Shmakov AN, Morey AL, Ferguson DJ, Fleming KA, O’Brien JA, Savidge TC. Conventional patterns of human intestinal proliferation in a severe-combined immunodeficient xenograft model. Differentiation 59: 321–330, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Sortino MA, Chisari M, Merlo S, Vancheri C, Caruso M, Nicoletti F, Canonico PL, Copani A. Glia mediates the neuroprotective action of estradiol on beta-amyloid-induced neuronal death. Endocrinology 145: 5080–5086, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Toumi F, Neunlist M, Cassagnau E, Parois S, Laboisse CL, Galmiche JP, Jarry A. Human submucosal neurones regulate intestinal epithelial cell proliferation: evidence from a novel co-culture model. Neurogastroenterol Motil 15: 239–242, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/G231    most recent
00276.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neunlist, M.
Right arrow Articles by Galmiche, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neunlist, M.
Right arrow Articles by Galmiche, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.