|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INFLAMMATION/IMMUNITY/MEDIATORS
Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Submitted 27 September 2006 ; accepted in final form 26 November 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
stimulation of the same pathways. Flagellin tolerance is a rapid process that does not require protein synthesis, and that occurs within 1 to 2 h of flagellin exposure. Prolonged flagellin exposure blocks activation of the NF-
B, MAPK, and phosphoinositol 3-kinase signaling pathways and results in the internalization of a fraction of the basolateral TLR5 without affecting the polarity or total expression of TLR5. After removal of flagellin, cells require more than 24 h to fully recover their ability to mount a normal proinflammatory response. We have found that activation of phosphoinositol 3-kinase and Akt by flagellin has a small damping effect in the early stages of flagellin signaling but is not responsible for tolerance. Our study indicates that inhibition of TLR5-associated IL-1 receptor-associated kinase-4 activity occurs during the development of flagellin tolerance and is likely to be the cause of tolerance.
inflammation
B), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, and proinflammatory cytokine gene expression. One enteric pathogen that initiates this innate immune response in the intestinal epithelium is the gram-negative pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. typhimurium). S. typhimurium is the leading cause of gastroenteritis in humans, and, in vivo, likely breaches the epithelial barrier by first invading enterocytes and M cells of the ileum and colon (22). Flagellin from S. typhimurium is known to be a ligand for the Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5), whose ligation induces proinflammatory gene expression in epithelial cells (11, 14, 42, 49). In polarized epithelial cells, TLR5 is localized to the basolateral membrane and thus is segregated from the luminal contents that contain flagellin (14, 15, 42). Under normal circumstances, this allows a rapid proinflammatory response to occur only when flagellin from an enteric pathogen like S. typhimurium has breached the epithelial barrier. The secreted flagellin can activate proinflammatory signaling through the basolateral TLR5, and type III effectors may provide the stimulus by which flagellin is transcytosed across the epithelium (42). However, in Crohn's disease, flagellin from commensal gut flora is believed to be the instigator of an aberrant mucosal immune response and chronic inflammation (29). This is likely to be a result of these genetically susceptible individuals having a leaky bowel mucosa (40, 45, 46), allowing flagellin from commensal gut bacteria to initiate an inappropriate immune response.
It is clear that the host innate immune response to bacterial components must be regulated to prevent an unrestrained or prolonged inflammatory immune response. Systemic LPS is known to be the principal initiator of septic shock; however, mechanisms seem to be in place that can limit the pathological effects of LPS and induce a state of hyporesponsiveness or tolerance (51). Recent in vitro studies have demonstrated that prior exposure to LPS can induce a state of tolerance in neutrophils and macrophages (31, 35). Other studies using cultured monocytes and T cells have demonstrated that prior exposure to flagellin also induces a state of tolerance to subsequent stimulation by flagellin (36). Both LPS- and flagellin-induced tolerance occurs within hours after the initial exposure (31, 35, 36); however, the precise mechanisms that regulate these induced states of tolerance have not been fully defined. Recently, the mechanisms that negatively regulate the innate immune response have begun to be investigated, and many seem to be both cell type and TLR specific. Possible mechanisms that have been identified thus far include a reduction in the surface expression of TLR2, TLR4, and the TLR4 coreceptor MD-2 (1, 41), the expression of soluble TLR2, TLR4, and MyD88 (6, 21, 24), and the expression of numerous intracellular inhibitors and regulators like the suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 and Toll-interacting protein (reviewed in Ref. 28).
The importance of flagellin-induced mucosal inflammation in both self-limiting gastroenteritis and chronic inflammation has been clearly demonstrated; however, the mechanisms by which it may be controlled in the polarized epithelium remain unknown. Recently, much attention has been focused on the development of tolerance to TLR ligands in immune cells. The mechanisms adopted by these nonpolarized cells to limit the immune response may, in fact, be quite different from those employed by the highly polarized intestinal epithelium. Indeed, the signaling pathways initiated by transmembrane receptors appear to be dictated by the membrane in which the receptor is localized (3, 23). Segregation of TLR5 receptors at the basolateral surface, and the compartmentalization of various cytoplasmic and membrane-associated signaling molecules, may provide for quite different mechanisms of tolerance in the polarized epithelium (18). In this study, we have used polarized epithelial cell model systems to explore the possibility that prior exposure to flagellin would result in functional downregulation of TLR5 responses and induce a state of hyporesponsiveness or tolerance to subsequent challenges with flagellin in polarized intestinal epithelial cells. We show here for the first time that flagellin-induced self-tolerance appears to be common to polarized epithelial cells and induces the internalization of TLR5 from the basolateral cell surface. We demonstrate that flagellin tolerance is a rapid, dose-dependent, protein synthesis-independent phenomenon that prevents flagellin signaling through the NF-
B, MAPK, and phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways. Activation of PI3K by flagellin seems to damp the proinflammatory response but is not required for flagellin tolerance to develop. Furthermore, recovery from the state of flagellin tolerance requires
24 h of incubation in flagellin-free medium before cells will again respond like nontolerant cells. The inhibition of IRAK-4 activity is associated with the flagellin-induced tolerance. It seems likely that the rapid and prolonged tolerance to flagellin will help to protect the host epithelium from an uncontrolled immune response and may well aid in the healing process after the initial inflammatory insult.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains, growth conditions, and flagellin purification.
Salmonella typhimurium 14028s or
3306 [wild type (WT)] and Escherichia coli F-18 (commensal gut strain) were grown as previously described (32, 34). E. coli F-18 (33) was provided by Beth McCormick (Harvard University Medical School, Boston, MA). Bacterial cultures were prepared for experimental use under nonagitated, microaerophilic conditions by culturing of 0.04 ml of a stationary-phase culture in 40 ml of Luria broth overnight (1518 h) at 37°C as previously described (32). Bacterial overnight cultures were concentrated 33-fold in Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. Flagellin was purified from WT S. typhimurium and E. coli F18 as previously described (14). Briefly, S. typhimurium or E. coli F-18 supernatants were filtered through 0.2-µm filters, concentrated 100-fold with Amicon 30-kDa filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA), and boiled for 20 min. The pH of the flagellin concentrate was adjusted to pH 6.0 and incubated with 0.5 ml High S cation exchange support (pH 6.0) (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and then polymyxin-B agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 1 h at room temperature with mixing. Resins were removed by centrifugation. Flagellin concentrate was diluted fivefold in 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and applied to a 2-ml High Q anion exchange column (Bio-Rad). The column was washed with 10 ml of 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. A 0.01.0 M NaCl linear gradient was applied to the column at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. Fractions (1.5 ml) were collected and analyzed for flagellin by Western blot. Fractions containing flagellin were pooled and assayed for bioactivity and concentration.
Measurement of IL-8 secretion. Confluent monolayers of T84, HT-29, Caco2BBE, and MDCK cells, grown on 6.5-mm-diameter (0.33 cm2) collagen-coated cell culture inserts were washed three times with HBSS, placed into 300 µl of HBSS, and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Monolayers were placed in dry wells, and 25 µl of Salmonella-containing HBSS (1.6 x 1010 bacteria/ml) were placed on the apical surface of each monolayer. This inoculum has been previously shown to correspond to 30 bacteria per cell (32). One hour later, the monolayers were returned to the wells containing 300 µl HBSS. Five hours after the bacteria were added, basolateral cell supernatants were removed and assayed for IL-8. Human IL-8 from T84, HT-29, and Caco2BBE cells was measured by ELISA as previously described (32). Canine IL-8 from MDCK cells was measured by ELISA in 96-well plates (Linbro/Titertek: ICN Biochemicals, Costa Mesa, CA) coated overnight with 1 µg/ml anti-rabbit IL-8 monoclonal antibody and detected with rabbit anti-canine IL-8 polyclonal antibody from Dr. Randal Mrsny (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA).
Antibodies and reagents.
The following reagents were used: recombinant human IL-8 and TNF-
, human IL-8 and phospho-Akt antibodies (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN); human IL-8 antibody (Endogen, Woburn, MA); rabbit IL-8 and canine IL-8 antibodies (Genentech, San Francisco, CA); peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD); peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse and peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights, IL); pan Akt, phospho-p44/42, phospho-p38, phospho-SAPK/JNK, phospho-p65 antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA); I
B
antibody, TLR4 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,); TLR5, IRAK-4 antibodies (Axxora, San Diego, CA), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and HA antibodies (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY); actin antibody, cycloheximide, wortmannin, E. coli LPS, mycrosistin-LR, myelin basic protein (Sigma-Aldrich), LY294002 (Promega, Madison, WI).
FACS assay for TLR-4 and TLR-5 expression. Epithelial cells were trypsinized and incubated with FITC-conjugated TLR-5 or TLR-4 antibodies for 30 min in the dark according to the manufacturer's protocol (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.
Cell surface biotinylation. Cell culture inserts were rinsed twice in ice-cold PBS supplemented with 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 (PBS-CM) and incubated for 30 min on ice with 1 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL) in PBS-CM added to either the apical or basolateral compartments. Biotinylation was quenched by incubating monolayers in 50 mM NH4Cl. Cells were washed three times in PBS and lysed for 10 min on ice in a solution containing 1% (wt/vol) Triton X-100, 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.2% (wt/vol) BSA supplemented with protease inhibitors. Biotinylated proteins were isolated by incubation with streptavidin-agarose beads (Pierce Chemical) for 16 h at 4°C. Proteins bound to agarose beads were solubilized by boiling for 5 min in sample buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2% SDS, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol), separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane for immunoblotting.
Cell extraction and immunoblotting. Cells were rinsed twice in ice- cold HBSS, lysed in protein loading buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2% SDS, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol), and sonicated with a Branson Sonifier 450 (Branson, Danbury, CT). Equal amounts of total cell protein were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose according to standard procedures, and processed for immunoblotting with specific antibodies. Immune complexes were visualized with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated antibodies and developed by use of an ECL kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Chemiluminescent signals were collected and scanned from BioMax film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) with a Scanjet 7400c backlit flatbed scanner (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA). For figures, the contrast of images was adjusted, arranged, and labeled in Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). Bands were quantified using NIH Image software. The digital images are representative of the original data.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Total RNA was extracted from epithelial cell monolayers using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and reverse transcribed using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer's directions. The RT cDNA reaction products were subjected to quantitative real-time PCR using the MyiQ single-color real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) and iQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's directions. IL-8 cDNA was amplified by using primers to the human IL-8 gene that are complementary to regions in exon 1 (5'-TGCATAAAGACATACTCCAAACCT) and overlapping the splice site between exons 3 and 4 (5'-AATTCTCAGCCCTCTTCAAAAA). All expression levels were normalized to the GAPDH levels of the same sample, using forward (5-CTTCACCACCATGGAGAAGGC) and reverse (5'-GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG) primers for GAPDH. Percent expression was calculated as the ratio of the normalized value of each sample to that of the corresponding untreated control cells. All real-time PCR reactions were performed in triplicate. All PCR primers were designed using Lasergene software (DNAStar, Madison, WI).
Coimmunoprecipitation and IRAK kinase assay.
IRAK kinase activity was measured as previously described (27, 36), with the following modifications. Cell culture inserts were incubated with or without flagellin for various times, rinsed twice in ice-cold HBSS, and lysed in ice-cold coimmunoprecipitation buffer [0.4% IGEPAL, 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN)]. Particulate matter was removed by centrifugation, and lysates were incubated with anti-HA antibody and protein A-agarose (Upstate) for 2 h at 4°C with gentle agitation. The immunoprecipitates were washed three times with coimmunoprecipitation buffer and each sample was divided into two parts. One half was solubilized in protein loading buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2% SDS, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol) for Western blot analysis, and the other half was washed three times with IRAK reaction buffer (20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM Mg2Cl, 20 mM
-glycerol phosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 µM microcystin-LR). ATP (5 µM), myelin basic protein (2 µg), and 10 µCi of [32P]-ATP were added to each reaction and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Protein loading buffer 5x was added to stop the reaction and equal volumes of the IRAK kinase reaction products were boiled, separated by SDS-PAGE, and the band was visualized by autoradiography.
Statistics. Results are expressed as means ± SD. Student's t-test was used to compare results, with statistical significance assumed at P < 0.05. Individual experiments were performed independently three or more times.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B
), the translocation of NF-
B to the nucleus, and the expression of a variety of proinflammatory cytokines. We began our study by asking whether prior exposure to purified S. typhimurium flagellin would prevent polarized epithelial cell monolayers from responding to subsequent challenges with WT Salmonella bacteria, purified Salmonella flagellin, or TNF-
. For these studies, we chose to use four different polarized epithelial cell lines to determine whether any observed flagellin effects were restricted to one cell line or could be seen in a variety of epithelial cells. The human intestinal epithelial cell lines T84, Caco2BBE, and HT-29, and the Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line (MDCKII) were grown on permeable membrane supports (cell culture inserts) to produce confluent monolayers of polarized cells. This cell culture method is thought to more closely approximate the epithelial monolayers found in the human intestine. The epithelial monolayers were then incubated with or without purified flagellin (100 ng/ml) added to the basolateral medium for 24 h.
When untreated monolayers were challenged for 5 h with TNF-
(100 ng/ml), WT Salmonella, or purified flagellin (100 ng/ml) they responded by secreting interleukin-8 (IL-8) into the basolateral medium (Fig. 1). Monolayers that had been previously incubated with basolateral flagellin for 24 h did not secrete IL-8 in response to the secondary stimulation with WT Salmonella or flagellin but remained responsive to challenge with TNF-
(Fig. 1). This indicates that flagellin tolerance is specific for flagellin/TLR5-mediated signaling and does not induce cross-tolerance for TNF-
signaling. Prolonged exposure to TNF-
induced self-tolerance but did not affect the proinflammatory response to flagellin or Salmonella (unpublished results).
|
We next sought to determine whether flagellin tolerance was dependent on the dose of flagellin applied. One assay commonly used to demonstrate Salmonella-induced activation of the proinflammatory signaling pathway is the degradation of the NF-
B inhibitory molecule I
B
. Thus we used the degradation of I
B
to determine the concentration of flagellin necessary to induce tolerance in epithelial cells. Epithelial monolayers were incubated for 24 h with various concentrations of basolateral flagellin and then challenged a second time with basolateral flagellin (100 ng/ml). Complete inhibition of I
B
degradation required primary flagellin concentrations of 25 ng/ml or higher (Fig. 2A), whereas concentrations from 5 to 10 ng/ml were only partially inhibitory. In addition to I
B
degradation, the activation of members of the MAPK family of signaling molecules, specifically p38 MAPK (52), are thought to play an important role in the proinflammatory signaling of TLR5. We next examined the activity of p38 using antibodies that recognize phosphorylated (active) p38. As expected the phosphorylation of p38 paralleled I
B
degradation over the range of flagellin concentrations used. Flagellin concentrations of 25 ng/ml and higher completely prevented p38 phosphorylation, and lower concentrations partially inhibited p38 activity (Fig. 2A). This can be clearly seen when the relative I
B
and phospho-p38 band intensities after secondary flagellin treatment were determined and compared with the corresponding untreated controls (Fig. 2B).
|
B and MAPK signaling pathways.
Flagellin tolerance affects the NF-
B and MAPK pathways in a time-dependent manner.
Thus far we had examined flagellin-induced tolerance after 24 h of exposure to flagellin. Our next objective was to determine the length of time cells must be exposed to flagellin before a state of tolerance ensues. We incubated epithelial monolayers with basolateral flagellin (100 ng/ml) for times ranging from 24 h to 5 min before a second 30-min incubation with flagellin (100 ng/ml). After the second flagellin incubation, the TLR5-signaling capacity was assessed by the degradation of I
B
and the phosphorylation (activation) of p38 MAPK, JNK, and p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2). As seen in Fig. 3A, our data show that flagellin tolerance was achieved with as little as 1 to 2 h of prior exposure to flagellin and that there was no significant difference in the amount of inhibition with longer flagellin-exposure periods. Similar results were obtained when the secondary stimulus was WT S. typhimurium instead of purified flagellin (not shown).
|
B
degradation as well as the activation of p38, JNK, and ERK1/2 by both WT Salmonella and purified flagellin (Fig. 3B). As seen before, flagellin tolerance had no effect on TNF-
stimulation of these pathways (Fig. 3B). A separate dose-response analysis of TNF-
stimulation indicated that even at low TNF-
concentrations (110 ng/ml), flagellin-induced tolerance did not alter TNF-
activation of the proinflammatory pathways (unpublished data). Flagellin tolerance reduces the basolateral surface expression of TLR5, but does not alter total TLR5 expression or require protein synthesis. One way in which cells can limit their response to an external stimulus is to remove the receptor from the cell surface. This is a well-understood mechanism of desensitization for the EGFR (50) and has recently been reported as a potential mechanism of tolerance for the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) (39, 41). We next sought to determine whether polarized epithelial cells used a mechanism of TLR5 internalization to limit their response to bacterial flagellin. Using domain-specific cell-surface biotinylation to isolate receptors from the apical or basolateral surfaces of polarized epithelial cell monolayers, we examined the effect of prior exposure to flagellin on the cell-surface expression of TLR5. In untreated epithelial monolayers, TLR5 was localized predominantly to the basolateral membrane in each of the cell lines tested (Fig. 4, A and B). This is consistent with previous observations of TLR5 surface distribution in polarized epithelial monolayers (14, 42). When epithelial monolayers were incubated for 24 h with basolateral flagellin (100 ng/ml), the highly polarized surface distribution of TLR5 was unaffected, and total TLR5 expression levels remained constant (Fig. 4, A and B). Interestingly, the basolateral expression level was reduced by as much as 1050% compared with the corresponding untreated controls (Fig. 4, A and B). Since the total TLR5 levels remain unchanged, it is likely that the internalized receptors are not degraded, but they may be sequestered in internal compartments. A basolateral marker EGFR was used as control for the specific effect that flagellin has on TLR5. Flagellin treatment did not change the distribution of EGFR (Fig. 4A).
|
B
degradation. For each of the flagellin pretreatment time points, 1, 4, and 6 h, cycloheximide did not prevent flagellin tolerance (Fig. 4C). In the cycloheximide-treated cells a noticeable decrease in I
B
expression was seen in both the control and flagellin-treated cells by 6 h (Fig. 4C). Long-term cycloheximide treatment reduced the viability of the monolayers and decreased I
B
expression to undetectable levels, making it difficult to determine whether protein synthesis is necessary at later time points, between 12 and 24 h. Our data demonstrate that inhibition of protein synthesis by cycloheximide treatment before and during incubation with flagellin was not able to block the induction of flagellin tolerance, thus indicating that protein synthesis is not required for the rapid onset or prolongation of flagellin tolerance.
LPS does not cross-regulate flagellin signaling in polarized epithelial cells.
Recent reports indicate that LPS can cross-regulate the response to other TLR ligands in macrophages (10, 26, 36, 43, 44). To determine whether this might also occur in polarized epithelial cells, we asked whether prior exposure to purified LPS would be able to cross-regulate flagellin signaling. The epithelial cell lines, T84, Caco2-BBE, HT-29, and MDCK, showed expression of TLR4 by Western blot (Fig. 5A). Additionally, we also confirmed the expression of the TLR4 by FACS in the human epithelial cells (data not shown). As a representative cell line, T84 monolayers were incubated at 37°C with LPS (2 µg/ml) added to both the apical and basolateral compartments for 0- to 24-h time periods and then assayed for I
B
degradation and phosphorylation of NF-
B (p65). Whereas the response to purified flagellin was rapid, LPS stimulation had very little effect on I
B
degradation and the phosphorylation of p65 was delayed until between 4 and 8 h after the addition of LPS (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, there appeared to be a transient reduction in TLR4 expression, followed by an upregulation between 2 and 8 h, followed by a reduction at 24 h of LPS stimulation.
|
(100 ng/ml) or flagellin (100 ng/ml) and analyzed by immunoblot for I
B
levels. Exposure to LPS for 24 h did not affect the ability of TNF-
or flagellin (Fig. 5C, lanes 5 and 6) to induce I
B
degradation, compared with monolayers that received flagellin pretreatment and obtained the tolerance to flagellin stimulation (Fig. 5C, lane 3). Interestingly, the epithelial monolayers were only mildly responsive to LPS treatment.
Recovery from flagellin-induced tolerance.
We have shown that flagellin tolerance is very rapid. Our next objective was to determine how long the state of tolerance would persist after removal of flagellin. As before, monolayers were incubated with basolateral flagellin for 24 h and then washed extensively to remove any residual flagellin. The washed monolayers were then incubated in fresh medium for times ranging from 30 min to 24 h followed by a second 30-min challenge with flagellin. Total protein and RNA were extracted from duplicate monolayers and used to determine TLR5 signaling activity by I
B
immunoblot and IL-8 message levels using quantitative real-time PCR. Immunoblot of total cell protein for I
B
degradation showed that monolayers gradually recovered their ability to respond to flagellin, beginning 1 h after flagellin washout and proceeding through 24 h of recovery (Fig. 6A). Quantification of the relative I
B
band intensities revealed that flagellin-tolerant monolayers are likely to require more than 24 h to recover before being able to mount a full response to flagellin compared with untreated controls (Fig. 6B). However, monolayers showed a normal phospho-p38 response by 12 h (Fig. 6B), indicating that the I
B
and MAPK pathways may have differing sensitivities to TLR5 activation upon recovery. Additionally, we used quantitative real-time PCR to determine when monolayers regained their ability to synthesize IL-8 in response to flagellin. As seen in Fig. 6C, cells required between 16 and 24 h of recovery after flagellin washout before being able to produce IL-8 message levels that were comparable to those of control nontolerant cells incubated with flagellin. Taken together, these data indicate that flagellin-induced tolerance has a long-lasting effect on the ability of cells to respond to subsequent challenges with flagellin.
|
60 min, and was declining by 2 h (Fig. 7A). This activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway is much more rapid than the 2-h incubation necessary to elicit a response in epithelial cells exposed to WT Salmonella (20). This is probably due to the fact that Salmonella must translocate flagellin across the monolayer to activate basolateral TLR5 before Akt phosphorylation can occur.
|
B and MAPK signaling pathways as evidenced by the presence of I
B
and phospho-p38 after a second 30-min dose of flagellin. The addition of the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 or wortmannin before and during the primary incubation with flagellin prevented Akt phosphorylation but was unable to inhibit flagellin tolerance (Fig. 7B). Interestingly, we also observed that flagellin tolerance prevented the flagellin stimulation of Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 7, B and C), demonstrating that flagellin tolerance can also impede signaling through the PI3K/Akt pathway. We next asked whether the inhibition of PI3K signaling by flagellin was restricted to TLR5 activation of the pathway or was instead a general block of PI3K stimulation. Monolayers were incubated with flagellin for 4 h, followed by incubation with epidermal growth factor (EGF) for an additional hour. As seen in Fig. 7D, prior incubation with flagellin did not prevent the subsequent EGF activation of PI3K whereas LY294002 treatment completely blocked EGF induced Akt phosphorylation. This indicates that the loss of PI3K signaling after flagellin tolerance seen in Fig. 7, B and C only applies to flagellin signaling through TLR5 and is not a result of a general inhibition of PI3K activity. To further examine the role of PI3K in flagellin tolerance we measured the induction of IL-8 message by real-time PCR. As expected, when monolayers were incubated with flagellin alone, a significant amount of IL-8 mRNA was detected, whereas monolayers pretreated with flagellin for 4 or 6 h had levels that were only slightly above background after secondary flagellin stimulation (Fig. 7E). However, monolayers that had been pretreated with LY294002 had significantly higher IL-8 mRNA levels (P < 0.05) in each of the treatment categories when compared with their vehicle (DMSO)-treated counterparts (Fig. 7E). Thus it appears that the rapid activation of PI3K/Akt signaling by flagellin stimulation may help to modify or damp the acute flagellin-induced proinflammatory signals but does not seem to contribute to the prolonged flagellin tolerance seen in epithelial monolayers.
TLR5 interacts with IRAK-4 during flagellin tolerance. Flagellin has been shown to activate IRAK-1 kinase activity in mouse macrophage-like and human THP-1 cells (36, 37). The phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of some of the downstream signaling molecules like IRAK-1 and IRAK-4 have been implicated in other systems as a means by which to induce tolerance to other TLR ligands (45). However, in our polarized epithelial cell system we observed transient IRAK-1 phosphorylation (Fig. 8A) but were unable to detect any change in the expression of IRAK-1. Recently, others have reported that TLR signaling can be inhibited by a failure to recruit the key mediator, IRAK-4 (6). To establish whether TLR5 associates with IRAK-4 during the development of flagellin tolerance, a series of coimmunoprecipitation experiments were conducted using MDCK cell lines that express HA-tagged TLR5. Monolayers were incubated for various times in the presence of basolateral flagellin. TLR5-HA was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using an anti-HA antibody, and probed by Western blot for IRAK-4. IRAK-4 coimmunoprecipitated with TLR5 at all time points; however, the higher molecular weight phosphorylated form was only seen between 30 min and 3 h (Fig. 8B). It indicated that flagellin treatment changed the phosphorylation of the TLR5-associated IRAK-4. However, we did not see a reduction in the total IRAK-4 after flagellin treatment in cell lysates by Western blot (Fig. 8B).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have shown that the initial exposure of the basolateral membrane to flagellin causes the rapid activation of multiple signaling cascades including the NF-
B, MAPK, and PI3K pathways and that it ultimately results in the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-8. We have demonstrated that prolonged incubation with basolateral flagellin produces a state of tolerance in the epithelial monolayer such that it becomes insensitive to further stimulation by flagellin. However, these same cells remain responsive to TNF-
stimulation, suggesting that flagellin tolerance occurs at an early step in the TLR5 signaling pathway. The ability to become tolerant to flagellin also seems to be common to epithelial cells in general since we were able to induce flagellin tolerance in all of the polarized epithelial cell lines tested. Interestingly, although each epithelial cell line was able to respond to flagellin and developed flagellin tolerance in a similar manner, differences were observed in the magnitude of IL-8 secretion in response to flagellin (Fig. 1). This might be explained in part by differences in TLR5 expression in the cell lines. However, other studies have showed that TLR5 expression levels do not necessarily correlate with the robustness of the flagellin response (49), and we were unable to detect any significant differences in total TLR5 expression among the cell lines tested (unpublished data). This suggests that differences in an as-yet-unidentified TLR5 adaptor molecule or one or more of the downstream signaling components may be responsible for the observed differences in flagellin-induced IL-8 secretion in the epithelial cell lines.
Flagellin-induced tolerance is a rapid process that does not require protein synthesis and is dose dependent. This tells us several things about the development of flagellin tolerance in epithelial cells. The speed at which flagellin tolerance is achieved and the lack of a requirement for protein synthesis suggest that the inhibitory molecule(s) or mechanism(s) are already in place when cells first come into contact with flagellin. The synthesis of an inhibitory molecule does not appear to be necessary, at least in the early stage of flagellin tolerance. We have observed a prolonged upregulation of I
B
expression during flagellin tolerance by Western blot (Fig. 3, A and B) and real-time PCR (unpublished data), but this is unlikely to be the basis of flagellin tolerance since it is unable to inhibit TNF-
-induced IL-8 secretion (Figs. 1 and 3). The phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of some of the downstream signaling molecules such as IRAK-1 and IRAK-4 have been implicated in other systems as a means by which to induce tolerance to other TLR ligands (17). In our polarized epithelial cell system, we observed transient IRAK-4 phosphorylation (Fig. 8A). We did observe a lack of IRAK kinase activity associated with TLR5 after prolonged flagellin stimulation. This leads us to speculate that the lack of IRAK-4 kinase activity is vital to the development of flagellin tolerance. In addition, our finding that recovery from flagellin tolerance is protracted also points toward the synthesis of a cofactor, and preliminary results indicate that protein synthesis is required for recovery. Alternatively, TLR5 itself may be modified by the initial interaction with flagellin, and the receptors may need to be regenerated during the recovery process. Studies are currently under way to explore these possible mechanisms.
Cross-regulation between TLR-signaling pathways has also become an area of great interest. Recent reports have demonstrated cross-regulation between the LPS and a variety of TLR ligands in macrophages/monocytes and T cells (10, 26, 36, 43, 44). Initially, we had sought to determine whether LPS might also cross-regulate flagellin signaling and vice versa; however, in our hands the intestinal epithelial cells were only minimally responsive to LPS treatment. We found that LPS pretreatment of monolayers had no effect on the signaling capacity of flagellin (Fig. 5). This finding is consistent with reports that intestinal epithelial cells downregulate TLR4 and MD-2 expression and are unresponsive to LPS treatment (1, 38). This seems to be a result of differentiation in polarized epithelial cells (25). However, other groups have noted responses to LPS in intestinal epithelial cells (8, 19). These results indicate that the LPS/flagellin cross-regulated tolerance observed in macrophages does not necessarily apply to polarized epithelial cells. At the same time it is in contrast to other observations of the functional expression of TLR4 at the plasma membrane (7, 8), and the intracellular localization of TLR4 in the Golgi apparatus (19) of intestinal epithelial cells. Taken together with the previous observation that LPS is released into intracellular vesicles during S. typhimurium invasion of epithelial cells (13), this may indicate an intracellular signaling role for TLR4. If these two separate findings are correct, one may then be able to speculate that flagellin tolerance does cross-regulate LPS/TLR4 signaling since flagellin pretreatment blocked S. typhimurium proinflammatory signals (Figs. 1 and 3).
We have shown here for the first time that prolonged exposure to flagellin results in TLR5 internalization from the cell surface without reducing total TLR5 expression. After incubation with flagellin for 24 h, polarized epithelial cell monolayers showed a 1050% reduction in the cell surface expression of TLR5 depending on the cell line being tested, yet each cell line was completely tolerant to further flagellin treatment (Fig. 4). This suggests that complete removal of TLR5 from the cell surface is not necessary for flagellin tolerance; however, internalization of receptors may be needed for activation of tolerance-inducing signaling cascades. This is consistent with other reports of reduced TLR4 cell surface expression during the development of LPS tolerance in macrophages (39). However, it is in contrast to other reports using Jurkat T-cells that did not have a reduction in surface TLR5 expression after incubation with flagellin (36). The differences seen in basolateral TLR5 expression hint at the possibility that only a subset of TLR5 receptors can be internalized; however, the precise differences in the putative receptor subsets remain elusive. It seems likely that the internalization of TLR5 after prolonged ligand exposure may be cell type dependent, but it is still unclear whether receptor internalization is necessary for TLR5 activation or required for the development of flagellin tolerance. Taken together with our dose response data this would suggest that a certain threshold of surface receptors is required to activate proinflammatory pathways. Internalization of some, but not all, of the surface receptors may prevent the threshold of activation from being reached, or at least it may damp the proinflammatory response.
The results presented in this report demonstrate that the prolonged exposure of polarized human intestinal epithelial cells to flagellin results in a state of tolerance to subsequent contact with flagellin that is dependent on the interaction of TLR5 with and activity of IRAK-4. The mechanism and biological relevance of flagellin tolerance in intestinal disease is a topic of great interest since flagellin from commensal enteric microflora has been identified as the predominant antigen in Crohn's disease (47). Recent evidence from the Dextran sulfate sodium-colitis mouse model indicates that the lack of MyD88-dependent TLR signaling results in the development of more severe colitis, suggesting that TLR signaling may have a protective role against the development of colitis (4). The precise role of flagellin tolerance during chronic inflammation and self-limiting enteritis should be explored.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kato, W. Lu, H. Kai, and K. C. Kim Phosphoinositide 3-kinase is activated by MUC1 but not responsible for MUC1-induced suppression of Toll-like receptor 5 signaling Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): L686 - L692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Shibolet and D. K. Podolsky TLRs in the Gut.IV. Negative regulation of Toll-like receptors and intestinal homeostasis: addition by subtraction Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): G1469 - G1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |