AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (July 14, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00070.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/5/G898    most recent
00070.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lammers, W. J.E.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lammers, W. J.E.P.
Submitted on February 16, 2005
Accepted on July 11, 2005

Spatial and temporal coupling between slow waves and pendular contractions

Wim J.E.P. Lammers1*

1 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University,, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wlammers{at}smoothmap.org.

Background & Aims: In contrast to the mechanisms of segmental and peristaltic contractions in the small intestine, not much is known about the mechanism of pendular contractions. Methods: High-resolution electrical and mechanical recordings were performed from isolated segments of rabbit ileum during pendular contractions. The electrical activities were recorded with a 32 extracellular electrodes while motility was assessed simultaneously by video tracking the displacements of 20-40 serosal markers. Results: The electrical activities consisted of slow waves, followed by spikes, that propagated in either the aboral or the oral direction. The mechanical activity always followed the initial electrical activity describing a contraction phase in one direction followed by a relaxation phase in the opposite direction. Pendular displacements were always in rhythm with the slow wave while the direction of the displacements was dictated by the origin of the slow wave. If the slow wave propagated aborally then the pendular displacement occurred in the oral direction while if the slow wave propagated in the oral direction then the displacement occurred in the aboral direction. In the case of more complex propagation patterns, such as in the area of pacemaking or collision, direction of displacements remained always opposite to the direction of the slow wave. Conclusion: In summary, the direction and pattern of propagation of the slow wave determines the rhythm and the direction of the pendular motility. The well-known variability in pendular movements is caused by the variability in propagation of the underlying slow wave.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.