AJP - GI Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (August 31, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00176.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/G282    most recent
00176.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zinsmeister, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zinsmeister, A. R.
Submitted on April 27, 2006
Accepted on August 24, 2006

RECTAL SENSORIMOTOR DYSFUNCTION IN WOMEN WITH FECAL INCONTINENCE

Christopher Andrews1, Adil E. Bharucha1*, Barbara M. Seide1, and Alan R. Zinsmeister2

1 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2 Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, ROCHESTER, Minnesota, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bharucha.adil{at}mayo.edu.

The rate and pattern of rectal distension affect rectal distensibility, perception, and anal relaxation in health. Because rectal urgency is a prominent symptom in fecal incontinence (FI), we assessed rectal distensibility, contractions, perception, and anal pressures during barostatic distention of a highly compliant polyethylene rectal balloon in 21 healthy, asymptomatic women (age 61 ± 2 years, Mean ± SEM) and 51 women with FI (60 ± 2 years). The rectum was inflated and then deflated between 0 and 200 ml at 25, 50, and 100mL/min; a phase of sustained distention (SD), lasting 1 minute, separated inflation and deflation. The rectum was stiffer during rapid compared to slow rectal distention. This effect was more prominent at a lower volume (50 ml) and was also more pronounced in older subjects and in fecal incontinence. A rectal contractile response was observed not only during inflation, but also during SD and during deflation. During inflation, this contractile response was rate dependent in controls but not in FI. During rectal distention, the duration of perception, but not sensory thresholds was significantly longer in FI. However, the rate of distention did not affect rectal perception (i.e., sensory thresholds or duration of perception) during ramp distentions. Baseline anal pressures and the magnitude of anal relaxation during rectal distention were also reduced in FI. In addition to reduced rectal capacity and compliance, women with FI had an exaggerated rate-dependent reduction in rectal distensibility, lower sensory thresholds, and more prolonged perception, indicative of recto-anal dysfunctions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.