AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (October 16, 2002). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00179.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
284/2/G213    most recent
00179.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Percy, W. H
Right arrow Articles by Wangsness, C. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Percy, W. H
Right arrow Articles by Wangsness, C. E

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print October 16, 2002
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 10.1152/ajpgi.00179.2002
Submitted on May 14, 2002
Accepted on October 15, 2002

Muscularis Mucosae Contraction Evokes Colonic Secretion Via Prostaglandin Synthesis and Nerve Stimulation

William H Percy1*, Theodore H Fromm1, and Christopher E Wangsness1

1 Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, The University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, South Dakota, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wpercy{at}usc.edu.

This in vitro study tested the hypothesis that muscularis mucosae contractile activity contributes to rabbit colonic mucosal function by mechanisms other than simple mechanical deformation of the epithelium. Experiments were performed using a technique that allows simultaneous recording of muscle activity and transmucosal potential difference, a measure of epithelial ion transport. ATP, bradykinin, histamine, PGs E2, F1{alpha} and F2{alpha} elicited muscularis mucosae contractions that were atropine-and TTX-resistant. Only ATP-induced contractions were indomethacin-sensitive and only those to DMPP were reduced by atropine. All agonist-evoked increases in transmucosal potential difference were atropine-resistant and, with the exception of those to PGE2, PGF2{alpha} and VIP, they were also TTX-sensitive. Mucosal responses to ATP, bradykinin and histamine were indomethacin-sensitive while those to DMPP, the prostaglandins and VIP were not. When cyclooxygenase activity or the mucosal innervation was compromised even maximal muscularis mucosae contractions did not produce large secretory responses. It is concluded that contraction-related prostaglandin synthesis and non-cholinergic secretomotor neuron stimulation represent the physiological transduction mechanism through which muscularis mucosae motor activity is translated into mucosal secretion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. Burnstock
Physiology and Pathophysiology of Purinergic Neurotransmission
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 659 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1979 by the American Physiological Society.