AJP - GI Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (January 10, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00179.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables and Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/3/G819    most recent
00179.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mortensen, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Revhaug, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mortensen, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Revhaug, A.
Submitted on April 23, 2007
Accepted on December 26, 2007

The regenerative response in the pig liver remnant varies with the degree of resection and rise in portal pressure

Kim Erlend Mortensen1*, Lene Nagstrup Conley2, Jakob Hedegaard2, Trine Kalstad3, Peter Sorensen2, Christian Bendixen2, and Arthur Revhaug4

1 Dept. of digestive surgery, University Hospital of Northern-Norway, Tromso, Norway
2 Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Research Centre Foulum, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
3 Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromso, Laboratory of Surgical Research, Norway
4 Laboratory of Surgical Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromso, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kimem{at}fagmed.uit.no.

Following parenchymal loss, the liver regenerates restoring normal mass and metabolic function. Prevailing theories on triggering events leading to regeneration include humoral, metabolic and flow-mediated mechanisms, the latter emphasizing the importance of shear stress mediated nitric oxide (NO) regulation. We aimed to investigate whether the grade of resection and hence the portal venous pressure and sinusoidal shear stress increase, would be reflected in the gene expression profiles in the liver remnant by employing a global porcine cDNA microarray chip with approximately 23 000 genes represented. Six pig livers were resected with 62% (Low Portal Pressure Resection, LPPR) and 75% (High Portal Pressure Resection) resulting in a portal venous pressure increase from a baseline of 6.1 mmHg to 8.2 and 12 mmHg respectively. By sampling consecutive biopsies from the liver remnants we found differentially expressed genes in the HPPR group to have functions related primarily to apoptosis, nitric oxide metabolism and oxidative stress, whereas differentially expressed genes in the LPPR group potentially regulate the cell cycle. Common to both groups was the upregulation of genes regulating inflammation, transport, cell proliferation and development and protein metabolism. Also common to both groups was both up- and downregulation of genes regulating cell-cell signaling, signal transduction, cell adhesion and translation. Genes regulating the metabolism of lipids, hormones, amines, and alcohol were downregulated in both groups. Conclusions: The genetic regenerative response in the liver remnant to varies according to the level of resection.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
B. Vollmar and M. D. Menger
The Hepatic Microcirculation: Mechanistic Contributions and Therapeutic Targets in Liver Injury and Repair
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2009; 89(4): 1269 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.