AJP - GI AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (December 16, 2004). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00388.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
288/4/G671    most recent
00388.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandolfino, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kahrilas, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandolfino, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kahrilas, P. J.
Submitted on August 27, 2004
Accepted on November 1, 2004

Absence of a Deglutitive Inhibition Equivalent with Secondary Peristalsis

John E. Pandolfino1*, Guoxiang Shi1, Qing Zhang1, and Peter J. Kahrilas1

1 Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medical, Chicago, Illinois, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j-pandolfino{at}northwestern.edu.

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the interactions between closely paired swallow induced primary peristalsis and air injection induced secondary peristalsis. Methods: Ten subjects (7M, 18-42yrs) were studied using a catheter including 2 sleeves (UES and LES), a mid esophageal infusion port, 7 esophageal, and 2 pharyngeal recording sites. Ten iterations of primary peristalsis (PP) and secondary peristalsis (SP) were induced by 5 ml water swallows and 20 ml intraesophageal air injections respectively. Thereafter, the interactions between PP and SP separated by 1- 12s intervals were studied in all four possible sequences: paired swallows, swallow preceded by air injection, air injection preceded by swallow and paired air injections. Tracings were analyzed for LES relaxation, presence and integrity of peristalsis, and event interaction. Results: Eight subjects with both success rates of ≥ 90% PP and ≥ 80% SP were analyzed (primary peristalsis 97±2%, secondary peristalsis 90±3%). During paired PP interactions and SP followed by PP, the first sequence was inhibited by the 2nd with intervals < 4-6s. However, no inhibition of the first peristaltic sequence was found in either PP followed by SP trials or SP followed by air injection. Conclusion: In contrast to swallowing or proximal esophageal distention, air injection into the lumen of the mid esophagus does not inhibit an ongoing peristaltic event. Being that the elicitation of SP in the smooth muscle esophagus is intramurally mediated, this suggests that deglutitive inhibition is a centrally mediated phenomenon rather than an intrinsic property of peristalsis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
S. K. Ghosh, J. E. Pandolfino, Q. Zhang, A. Jarosz, N. Shah, and P. J. Kahrilas
Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): G988 - G997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.