AJP - GI Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (January 13, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00478.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
288/6/G1190    most recent
00478.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bredenoord, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smout, A. J.P.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bredenoord, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smout, A. J.P.M.
Submitted on October 28, 2004
Accepted on January 11, 2005

Sleeve sensor versus high-resolution manometry for the detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations

A. J. Bredenoord1*, B. L.A.M. Weusten1, R. Timmer1, and A. J.P.M. Smout2

1 Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
2 Gastrointestinal Research Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.bredenoord{at}antonius.net.

Background and aim: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the most important mechanism by which gastroesophageal reflux occurs and sleeve sensor manometry is the gold standard for detection of TLESRs. The aim of this study was to evaluate manometry with closely spaced sideholes (high-resolution manometry) for the detection of TLESRs as an alternative. Methods: In twelve patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease a 90-min postprandial manometry was performed using a catheter incorporating both a sleeve sensor and closely spaced sideholes in the esophagogastric junction. TLESRs recorded with both techniques were scored. Reflux during TLESRs was detected using manometry (common cavity), intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring. Results: A total of 145 TLESRs were detected using both techniques, 117 with high-resolution manometry and 108 with sleeve sensor manometry (NS). Manometric signs of reflux during TLESRs detected with high-resolution and sleeve sensor manometry were found in 62.4 and 56.5 % (NS) respectively, while 38.5 and 35.2 % (NS) on pH-metry and 70.1 and 60.2 % (NS) on impedance monitoring. TLESRs recognized only with high-resolution manometry were more often accompanied by reflux, as detected with manometry (59.5 %) and impedance monitoring (67.6 %), than TLESRs recognized only with sleeve sensor manometry (32.1 and 28.6 %). Conclusion: High-resolution manometry is at least as accurate as sleeve sensor manometry for the detection of TLESRs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
M R Fox and A J Bredenoord
Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice
Gut, March 1, 2008; 57(3): 405 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
A J Bredenoord, W A Draaisma, B L A M Weusten, H G Gooszen, and A J P M Smout
Mechanisms of acid, weakly acidic and gas reflux after anti-reflux surgery
Gut, February 1, 2008; 57(2): 161 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.