AJP - GI AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (February 2, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00487.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/6/G1164    most recent
00487.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bharucha, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by An, K.-N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bharucha, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by An, K.-N.
Submitted on October 12, 2005
Accepted on January 23, 2006

Comparison of Rectoanal Axial Forces in Health and Functional Defecatory Disorders

Adil E. Bharucha1*, Andrew J. Croak2, John B. Gebhart2, Lawrence J. Berglund3, Barbara M. Seide1, Alan R. Zinsmeister4, and Kai-Nan An3

1 Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research Program (C.E.N.T.E.R.), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
2 Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
3 Orthopedics Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
4 Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bharucha.adil{at}mayo.edu.

Anal manometry measures circumferential pressures, but not axial forces, which are responsible for defecation and contribute to fecal continence. Our aims were to investigate these mechanisms by measuring axial rectoanal forces with an intra-rectal sphere or a latex balloon, fixed at 8, 6, or 4 cm from the anal verge, and connected to axial force and displacement transducers. Rectoanal forces and rectal pressures within a latex balloon were measured at baseline (i.e., at rest) and during maneuvers (i.e., squeeze, simulated evacuation, and a Valsalva maneuver) in 12 asymptomatic women and 12 women with symptoms of difficult defecation. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were also assessed by manometry and were similar in controls and patients. At rest, axial rectoanal forces were directed inward and increased as the device approached the anal verge. Controls augmented this inward force when they squeezed and exerted an outward force during simulated expulsion and a Valsalva maneuver. The force change during maneuvers was also affected by device location and was highest at 4 cm from the verge. In patients, the force at rest and the change in force during all maneuvers was lower than in controls. The rectal pressure during a Valsalva maneuver was also lower in patients than in controls, suggestive of impaired propulsion. In conclusion, a subset of women with defecatory symptoms had weaker axial forces not only during expulsion but also during a Valsalva maneuver and when they squeezed (i.e., contracted) their pelvic floor muscles, suggestive of generalized pelvic floor weakness.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.