AJP - GI AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (May 10, 2002). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00499.2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/3/G681    most recent
00499.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mundt, M. W
Right arrow Articles by Samsom, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mundt, M. W
Right arrow Articles by Samsom, M.

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print May 10, 2002
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 10.1152/ajpgi.00499.2001
Submitted on November 21, 2001
Accepted on May 3, 2002

Effect of the intragastric barostat bag on proximal and distal gastric accommodation in response to a liquid meal

Marco W Mundt1*, Trygve Hausken2, and Melvin Samsom1

1 Gastrointestinal Research Unit, Dept of Gastroenterology and Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 Medical Department, Division of Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.w.mundt{at}digd.azu.nl.

Objectives: The barostat is the gold standard for measurement of proximal gastric accommodation. Ultrasonography can be used to measure gastric volume. Aim was to investigate effects of the barostat bag on gastric accommodation and transpyloric flow. Methods: Accommodation after a liquid meal (300 ml, 450 kcal) was measured twice at random in 8 healthy volunteers. Proximal accommodation was measured once using barostat (BS) and once using ultrasound (US). Antrum accommodation was measured using US. Bag volume (BV), antral area (AA), proximal gastric area (PGA) and proximal gastric diameter (PGD) data were assessed before and 1, 5, 15, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min postprandially. Transpyloric flow was measured using Doppler 1-5 minutes postprandially. Results: Fasted, AA size was not affected by the barostat bag (1mmHg>MDP) (2.7(0.5) vs. 2.6(0.3) cm2). Postprandially AA's were larger with the bag present (ANOVA, p<0.04). Maximum AA was reached with the bag 5 min, without 1 min postprandially (15.1±2.3 vs. 9.4±1.5 cm2, p<0.03). Furthermore AA's were related to BV's (r=0.57, p<0.01). After bag deflation, AA decreased (11.9±1.8 to 7.0±0.9 cm2, p=0.02) and was comparable to the 60 min AA size without the bag (7.1±1.2 cm2, p=0.76) present. Proximal gastric radius calculated from the BV's and PGD's was larger with the bag present (ANOVA, p<0.001). No effect on early gastric emptying was observed. Conclusions: Postprandial the barostat bag causes dilatation of the antrum, due to meal displacement without influencing early gastric emptying. This antral dilatation is likely to induce exaggerated proximal gastric relaxation observed in studies using the barostat to evaluate fundic accommodation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1979 by the American Physiological Society.