AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (December 14, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00527.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/4/G1002    most recent
00527.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Travagli, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Travagli, R. A.
Submitted on November 10, 2006
Accepted on December 11, 2006

Dopamine effects on identified rat vagal motoneurons

Zhongling Zheng1 and R. Alberto Travagli1*

1 Neuroscience, Pennington Biomedical Research Center-LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: alberto.travagli{at}pbrc.edu.

Catecholaminergic neurons of the A2 area play a prominent role in brainstem vagal circuits. It is not clear, however, if these neurons are noradrenergic/adrenergic (i.e. display tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopamine-{beta}-hydroxylase (D{beta}H) immunoreactivity (-IR) or dopaminergic (i.e TH- but not D{beta}H-IR). Our aims were to investigate whether a subpopulation of neurons in the A2 area was dopaminergic and, if so, to investigate the effects of dopamine (DA) on the membrane of gastric-projecting vagal motoneurons. We observed that while the majority of A2 neurons were both TH- and D{beta}H-IR, a small percentage of NTS neurons were TH-IR only, suggesting that DA itself may play role in these circuits. Whole cell recordings from thin brainstem slices, showed that 71% of identified gastric-projecting motoneurons responded to DA (1-300µM) with either an excitation (28%) or an inhibition (43%) of the membrane; the remaining 29% of the neurons were unresponsive. The DA-induced depolarization was mimicked by SK38393 and prevented by pretreatment with SCH23390. Conversely, the DA-induced inhibition was mimicked by bromoergocryptine and prevented by pretreatment with L741626. When tested on the same neuron, the effects of DA and NE were not always similar. In fact, in neurons in which DA induced a membrane depolarization, 77% were inhibited by NE, while 75% of neurons unresponsive to DA were inhibited by NE. Our data suggest that DA modulates the membrane properties of gastric-projecting motoneurons via D1- and D2-like receptors, and DA may play different roles than NE in brainstem vagal circuits.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.