AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 284: G956-G962, 2003. First published February 12, 2003; doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00477.2002
0193-1857/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
284/6/G956    most recent
00477.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xing, J.
Right arrow Articles by Soffer, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xing, J.
Right arrow Articles by Soffer, E.
Vol. 284, Issue 6, G956-G962, June 2003

The effect of gastric electrical stimulation on canine gastric slow waves

Jinhong Xing1, Frederick Brody2, Michael Rosen2, J. D. Z. Chen3, and Edy Soffer1

1 Gastroenterology, 2 General Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195; and 3 The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0764

This study determined the most efficient parameters of low-frequency/long-pulse gastric electrical stimulation (GES) required to entrain gastric slow waves and also evaluated the effect of entrainment and high-frequency, short-pulse GES on gastric electrical activity (GEA). Nine dogs were fitted with stimulation wires along the greater curvature. Entrainment was observed in six or seven animals, with long-pulse GES at six cycles per minute (cpm), at various combinations of current and pulse width and was directly related to the energy delivered. Entrainment was observed in four to seven animals, with GES at 12 cpm, and the maximal driven frequency was 6 cpm. Entrainment did not significantly increase the dominant power of GEA. High-frequency, short-pulse GES, using pulse trains of 14 Hz, 5 mA, and 330 µs, with 0.1 s on and 5 s off, and pulse trains of 40 Hz, 10 mA, and 330 µs, with 2 s on 3 s off, did not affect variables of GEA. We conclude that acute low-frequency GES but not high-frequency, short-pulse GES can entrain slow waves; the power of slow waves is not affected by either type of stimulation.

low-frequency, long-pulse gastric electrical stimulation; high-frequency, short-pulse gastric electrical stimulation


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. J. Mason, J. Lipham, G. Eckerling, A. Schwartz, and T. R. DeMeester
Gastric Electrical Stimulation: An Alternative Surgical Therapy for Patients With Gastroparesis
Arch Surg, September 1, 2005; 140(9): 841 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.