HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 296/1/G1    most recent 90380.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huizinga, J. D. Articles by Lammers, W. J. E. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huizinga, J. D. Articles by Lammers, W. J. E. P.

REVIEW

Gut peristalsis is governed by a multitude of cooperating mechanisms

McMaster University, Intestinal Disease Research Programme, Department of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates

Submitted 17 June 2008 ; accepted in final form 3 November 2008

ABSTRACT

Peristaltic motor activity of the gut is an essential activity to sustain life. In each gut organ, a multitude of overlapping mechanisms has developed to acquire the ability of coordinated contractile activity under a variety of circumstances and in response to a variety of stimuli. The presence of several simultaneously operating control systems is a challenge for investigators who focus on the role of one particular control activity since it is often not possible to decipher which control systems are operating or dominant in a particular situation. A crucial advantage of multiple control systems is that gut motility control can withstand injury to one or more of its components. Our efforts to increase understanding of control mechanism are not helped by recent attempts to eliminate proven control systems such as interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) as pacemaker cells, or intrinsic sensory neurons, nor does it help to view peristalsis as a simple reflex. This review focuses on the role of ICC as slow-wave pacemaker cells and places ICC into the context of other control mechanisms, including control systems intrinsic to smooth muscle cells. It also addresses some areas of controversy related to the origin and propagation of pacemaker activity. The urge to simplify may have its roots in the wish to see the gut as a consequence of a single perfect design experiment whereas in reality the control mechanisms of the gut are the messy result of adaptive changes over millions of years that have created complementary and overlapping control systems. All these systems together reliably perform the task of moving and mixing gut content to provide us with essential nutrients.

interstitial cells of Cajal; motility; pacemaker; transit; slow waves

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Du, S. Li, G. O'Grady, L. K. Cheng, A. J. Pullan, and J. D. Z. Chen Effects of electrical stimulation on isolated rodent gastric smooth muscle cells evaluated via a joint computational simulation and experimental approach Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2009; 297(4): G672 - G680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. E. P. Lammers, L. Ver Donck, B. Stephen, D. Smets, and J. A. J. Schuurkes Origin and propagation of the slow wave in the canine stomach: the outlines of a gastric conduction system Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): G1200 - G1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]