AJP - GI ADInstruments data acquisition for life science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (April 9, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.90408.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/6/G1344    most recent
90408.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suttor, V. P
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suttor, V. P
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, A.
Submitted on July 2, 2008
Revised on March 30, 2009
Accepted on April 1, 2009

Colorectal Responses to Distension and Feeding in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Vid P Suttor1, Clinton Ng1, Susan Rutkowski1, Ross D Hansen1, John E Kellow, and Allison Malcolm1*

1 Royal North Shore Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: amalcolm{at}med.usyd.edu.au.

Objective: The role of the central nervous system in entero-enteric motor reflexes remains controversial. Our aims were: (1) to evaluate colorectal, rectocolic, gastrocolonic and gastrorectal reflex responses in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI); and (2) to compare with healthy subjects. Setting: Tertiary Referral Centre. Patients: Six patients with SCI (5 M, 42±4 years), and 6 healthy control subjects (5 M, 36±5 years). Design: Two-minute phasic distensions performed randomly via dual barostat balloons in the colon and rectum. Continuous colonic and rectal balloon volumes recorded during distensions and after a 1000 kcal liquid meal. Main Outcome Measures: Mean balloon volumes before, during and after phasic distensions; and over 60 minutes postprandially. Results: The colorectal response was present in all subjects, similarly in health and SCI (rectal volume reduction 28±11% SCI vs 15±5% health); the rectocolic response was variable. The gastrocolonic response was present in all subjects (colonic volume reduction 49±4% SCI vs 44±3% health), with a time effect in the first 30 minutes (p<0.0001), and a group effect in the second 30 minutes (p<0.004). The gastrorectal response was present in 4 SCI and 5 health (rectal volume reduction 38±4% SCI vs 41±3% health), with a time effect in the first 30 minutes (p<0.0001), but no group effect in the second 30 minutes. Conclusion: Intact neural transmission between the spinal cord and higher centres is not essential for normal colorectal motor responses to feeding and to distension; however a degree of CNS and neurohormonal modulation of these responses is likely.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.