AJP - GI AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (December 4, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.90506.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/2/G168    most recent
90506.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kindel, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tso, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kindel, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tso, P.
Submitted on August 19, 2008
Revised on November 17, 2008
Accepted on December 2, 2008

Nutrient-driven incretin secretion into intestinal lymph is different between diabetic, Goto-Kakizaki rats and Wistar rats

Tammy Lyn Kindel1*, Qing Yang1, Stephanie M. Yoder1, and Patrick Tso2

1 University of Cincinnati
2 University of Cincinnati Medical Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: venematl{at}email.uc.edu.

Objective. The incretin hormones, GIP and GLP-1, augment post-prandial glucose-mediated insulin release from pancreatic {beta}-cells. The Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rat is a widely-used, lean rodent model of type 2 diabetes; however, little is known regarding the incretin secretion profile to different nutrients in these rats. We have recently shown that lymph is a sensitive medium to measure incretin secretion in rodents and probably the preferred compartment for GLP-1 monitoring. To characterize the meal-induced incretin profile, we compared lymphatic incretin concentrations in the GK and Wistar rat after enteral macronutrient administration. Methodology. After cannulation of the major mesenteric lymphatic duct and duodenum, each animal received an intra-duodenal bolus of either a fat emulsion, dextrin, a mixed meal, or saline. Lymph was collected for 3 hours and analyzed for triglyceride, glucose, GLP-1 and GIP content. Results. There was no statistical difference in GIP or GLP-1 secretion after a lipid bolus between GK and Wistar rats. Dextrin and a mixed meal both increased incretin concentration AUC, however significantly less in GK rats compared to Wistar rats (dextrin GIP: 707 (pg/ml)hr ± 106 versus 1373 (pg/ml)hr ± 114 respectively, p<0.001; dextrin GLP-1: 82.7 (pM)hr ± 24.3 versus 208.3 (pM)hr ± 26.3 respectively, p=0.001). Conclusions. After administration of a carbohydrate-containing meal, GK rats were unable to mount as robust a response of both GIP and GLP-1 compared to Wistar rats, a phenomenon not seen after a lipid meal. We propose a similar, glucose-mediated incretin secretion pathway defect of both K and L cells in GK rats.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.