AJP - GI AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (November 20, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpgi.90525.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/2/G310    most recent
90525.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. D.Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. D.Z.
Submitted on September 4, 2008
Revised on November 18, 2008
Accepted on November 19, 2008

Synchronized Gastric Electrical Stimulation Improves Vagotomy-induced Impairment in Gastric Accommodation via the Nitrergic Pathway in Dogs

Jie Chen1, Thillai Koothan, and Jiande D.Z. Chen2*

1 Union hospital of Tongji Medical University
2 University of Texas Medical Branch

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jianchen{at}utmb.edu.

Background and aims: Impaired gastric accommodation and gastric dysrhythmia are common in gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia. Recent studies have shown that synchronized gastric electrical stimulation (SGES) accelerates gastric empty and enhances antral contractions in dogs. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects and mechanism of SGES on gastric accommodation and slow waves impaired by vagotomy in dogs. Methods: Gastric tone, compliance and accommodation as well as slow waves with and without SGES were assessed in seven female regular dogs and seven dogs with bilateral truncal vagotomy, chronically implanted with gastric serosal electrodes and a gastric cannula. Results: 1) Vagotomy impaired gastric accommodation that was normalized by SGES. The postprandial increase in gastric volume was 283.5±50.6mL in the controlled dogs, 155.2±49.2mL in the vagotomized dogs and 304.0± 57.8 mL in the vagotomized dogs with SGES. The ameliorating effect of SGES was no longer observed after application of N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA). 2) Vagotomy did not alter gastric compliance whereas SGES improved gastric compliance in the vagotomized dogs and the improvement was also blocked by L-NNA. 3) Vagotomy impaired antral slow wave rhythmicity in both fasting and fed states. SGES at the proximal stomach enhanced the postprandial rhythmicity and amplitude (dominant power) of the gastric slow waves in the antrum. Conclusions: SGES with appropriate parameters restores gastric accommodation and improves gastric slow waves impaired by vagotomy. The improvement in gastric accommodation with SGES is mediated via the nitrergic pathway. Combined with previously reported findings (enhanced antral contractions and accelerated gastric emptying) and findings in this study (improved gastric accommodation and slow waves), SGES may be a viable therapy for gastroparesis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.